Electoral Defeat and Party Change: When do Parties Adapt?
Abstract
Electoral defeat has sometimes been called the mother of party change, but is this reputation warranted? In this paper we investigate whether party characteristics such as government status, party systemic origins, or ideological family affect how parties respond to defeat. Examining 73 parties in 28 countries, considering party efforts to change their leadership, their programs and their organizations, we conclude that only systemic origin (post-communist vs. West European countries) is a relevant factor affecting depth of party change. Parties take some corrective actions after electoral defeat, however, they are not likely to be a wholesale reforms. Thus, it would be more accurate to describe electoral defeat as a midwife of a party change, not as its mother.
Keywords
electoral defeat; political parties; party change; Europe
References
Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2004). Understanding and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results? British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 589–610.
Ágh, A. (2000). Party formation and the 1998 elections in Hungary: defeat as promotor of change for the HSP. East European Politics and Societies, 14(2), 285–315.
Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bendor, J. (2010). Bounded Rationality and Politics. Berkley: University of California Press.
Biezen van, I. C. (2003). Political parties in New Democracies. Party Organisation in Southern and East-Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bobbio, N. (1994). Left and Right. The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bolleyer, N. (2013). New Parties in Old Party Systems. Persistence and Decline in Seventeen Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bosco, A., & Morlino, L. (2006). What Changes in South European parties? A Comparative Introduction. South European Society & Politics, 11(3-4), 331–358.
Budge, I. (1994). A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 443–467.
Cyr, J. (2016). Between Adaptation and Breakdown. Comparative Politics, 49(1), 125–145.
Eley, G. (2002). Forging Democracy. The History of the Left in Europe, 1850-2000. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Fell, D. (2009). Lessons of Defeat: A Comparison of Taiwanese Ruling Parties Responses to Electoral Defeat. Asian Politics and Policy, 1(4), 660–681.
Fraser, D. (2007). Lately, Things Just Don’t Seem the Same’: External Shocks, Party Change and the Adaptation of the Dutch Christian Democrats during ‘Purple Hague. Party Politics, 13(1), 69–87.
Gauja, A. (2017). Party Reform: The Causes, Challenges and Consequences of Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gherghina, S., & Berge von dem, B. (2018). When Europeanisation meets organisation: enhancing the rights of party members in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Integration, 40(2), 209–226.
Gunther, R., & Diamond, L. (2003). Species of Political Parties. A New Typology. Party Politics, 9(2), 167-199.
Harmel, R. (2002). Party Organizational Change. Competing Explanations? In: K.R. Luther & F. Müller-Rommel (eds.), Political Parties in the New Europe. Political and Analytical Challenges (pp. 119–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harmel, R., & Janda, K. (1994). An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), 259–287.
Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. (1993). Party Leadership and Party Institutionalisation: Three Phases of Development. West European Politics, 16(2), 67–88.
Harmel, R., Heo, U., Tan, A., & Janda, K. (1995). Performance, Leadership, Factions and party Change: An Empirical Analysis. West European Politics, 18(1), 1–33.
Janda, K. (1990). Toward a Performance Theory of Change in Political Parties. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress of the International Sociological Association. http://www.janda.org/bio/parties/papers/Janda%20(1990).pdf (26/04/2020).
Kitschelt, H. (1988). Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Competitive Party Systems. World Politics, 40(2), 194–234.
Kitschelt, H. (1993). Social Movements, Political Parties, and Democratic Theory. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 13–29.
Kitschelt, H. (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Kopecký, P. (1995). Developing Party Organizations in East-Central Europe: What Type of Party is Likely to Emerge? Party Politics, 1(4), 515–534.
Langston, J. (2003). Rising from Ashes? Reorganizing and Unifying the PRI’s State Party Organizations after Electoral Defeat. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 293–318.
Lawson, K., & Poguntke, T. (eds). (2004). How Political Parties Respond. Interest Aggregation Revisited. London and New York: Routledge.
Lewis, P.G. (1996). Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lisi, M. (2010). Innovation and Adaptation in Contemporary Left-Wing Parties: Lessons from Southern Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(1), 60–79.
Louault, F., & Pellen, C. (eds.). (2019). La défaite électorale. Productions, appropriations, bifurcations. Presses Universitaires de Rennes. Rennes.
Moshkovich, Y. (2011). Changes in Likud Party organization as an outcome of electoral victory in 1988 and electoral defeat in 1992: an Israeli case Study. Israel Affairs, 17(4), 583–603.
Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (2004). Why Parties Fail to Learn. Electoral Defeat, Selective Perception and British Party Politics. Party Politics, 10(1), 85–104.
Pacześniak, A., and Bachryj-Krzywaźnia, M. (2019). Electoral Defeat As ‘Mother of Party Change’: Towards Objective-Subjective Approach. Czech Journal of Political Science/Politologický časopis, (26)2: 122-134.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties. Organization and Power. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Redding, K., and Viterna, J.S. (1999). Political Demands, Political Opportunities: Explaining the Differential Success of Left-Libertarian Parties. Social Forces, 78(2), 491–510.
Schumacher, G., de Vries, C.E., and Vis, B. (2013). Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives. The Journal of Politics, 75(2): 464–477.
Schumacher, G., Wardt van de, M., Vis, B., and Klitgaard, M. (2015). How aspiration to office conditions the impact of government participation on party platform change. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4): 1040–1054.
Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 238–248.
Van der Velden, M., Schumacher, G., and Vis, B. (2017). Living in the Past or Living in the Future? Analyzing Parties’ Platform Change in Between Elections, The Netherlands 1997-2014. Political Communication, 35(3): 393–412.
University of Wroclaw Poland
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-4432
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
