Media and Information Literacy of Students – Skills and Challenges in the Context of Political Preferences
The example of Poland
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to present the link between the level of media and information literacy (MIL) and political preferences of Polish students based on empirical research. MIL is a key issue for today’s societies as it equips citizens with the skills needed to use various media and information channels and exercise their basic human rights. Phenomena such as post-truth, the way people are more inclined to accept arguments based on emotions and beliefs than facts, disinformation and fake news are an important context and subject of ongoing scientific discussions. Keeping in mind the limitations of self-report methods, the authors combine the elements of students’ self-assessment with the questions that test their theoretical knowledge and competences related to recognizing fake news. The research sample consists of 870 students of social sciences and journalism. The results of the research provide detailed knowledge about the level of MIL as well as political preferences of students. By that, authors hope to contribute to the global scientific discussion, offering their research conducted in the context of the declining quality of democracy in Poland.
Keywords
fake news; democracy; media; Media and Information Literacy; political preferences; survey
References
World Press Freedom Index. (2015). Reporters Without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2015
World Press Freedom Index. (2021). Reporters Without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2021
Annan, K. (2018). The developing world is an easy target for populists. New Perspectives Quarterly, 35(3), 33–35.
Ashley, S., Maksl, A. & Craft, S. (2017). News Media Literacy and Political Engagement: What’s the Connection? Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 79–98.
Carlsson, U. (Ed.). (2019). Understanding media and information literacy (MIL) in the digital age. A question of democracy. Gothenburg: Department of Journalism, Media and Communication (JMG).
CBOS (2021a). Zainteresowanie polityką i poglądy polityczne młodych Polaków na tle ogółu badanych (Komunikat z Badań nr 16/2021). Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
CBOS (2021b). Preferencje partyjne w kwietniu (Komunikat z Badań nr 46/2021). Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
Dizikes, P. (2018, March 8). Study: On Twitter, false news travels faster than true stories. MIT News. http://news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308
European Audiovisual Observatory (2016). Mapping of media literacy practices and actions in EU-28. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0a387a0a-3e5f-11ea-ba6e-01aa75ed71a1
Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political Elites' Use of Fake News Discourse Across Communications Platforms. Journal of International Communication, 13, 4353–4375.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2001). Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych. Zysk i S-ka.
Frau-Meigs, D., Velez, I., & Flores Michel, J. (Eds.) (2017). Public Policies in Media and Information Literacy in Europe. Cross-Country Comparisons. Routledge.
Freedom House (2021). Poland. Freedom in the World 2021. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/poland/freedom-world/2021
Gorwa, R. (2019). Poland: Unpacking the Ecosystem of Social Media Manipulation. In S.C. Woolley, & P.N. Howard (Eds.). Computational Propaganda. Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media (pp. 86–103). Oxford University Press.
Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2019). Media and Communication Research Methods. Red Globe Press.
Iwanicka, A., Walter, N., & Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak. A. (2014). Media and Information Literacy Policies in Poland (2013) ANR TRANSLIT and COST „Transforming Audiences/Transforming Societies”.
Klimkiewicz, B. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country report: Poland. The Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, European University Institute.
Kłosińska K., Zimny R., & Żukiewicz P. (2018). Sprawozdanie ze stanu ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017 – Język informacji politycznej. Rada Języka Polskiego.
Kuś, M., & Barczyszyn-Madziarz, P. (2020). Fact-checking initiatives as promoters of media and information literacy: The case of Poland. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(2), 249–265.
Lessenski, M. (2021, March 14). Media Literacy Index 2021. Open Society Institute Sofia. https://osis.bg/?p=3750〈=en
Lopes, P. C. (2015). Literacia mediática e cidadania : uma relação garantida? Análise social 216, 546–581.
Łódzki, B. (2017). Fake news – Dezinformacja w mediach internetowych i formy jej zwalczania w przestrzeni międzynarodowej. Polityka i Społeczeństwo, 15(4), 19–30.
Meinert, J., Mirbabaie, M., Dungs, S., & Aker, A. (2018). Is it really fake? – Towards an Understanding of Fake News in Social Media Communication. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media: User Experience and Behavior (pp. 484–497). Springer.
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622.
Norris, P. (2019). Do perceptions of electoral malpractice undermine democratic satisfaction? The US in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review 40(1), 5–22.
Ojebuyi, B. R., & Salawu, A. (2015). Media Literacy, Access and Political Participation among South African Black Youth: A Study of North-West University. Journal of Communication 6(1), 207–218.
PAP (2021, April 16). Sondaż wyborczy Kantar: Zjednoczona Prawica zyskała 1 proc. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/kraj/artykuly/8144053,sondaz-wyborczy-kantar-kwiecien-2021-zjednoczona-prawica.html
PKW (2019). Wybory do Sejmu i Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 2019. Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. https://sejmsenat2019.pkw.gov.pl/sejmsenat2019/
Ptaszek, G. (2019). Edukacja medialna 3.0: krytyczne rozumienie mediów cyfrowych w dobie Big Data i algorytmizacji [Media education 3.0: critical understanding of digital media in the age of Big Data and algorithmization]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Repucci, S., & Slipowitz, A. (2021). Freedom in the World 2021. Democracy under Siege. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege
Salik, H., & Płociński, M. (2020, November 6). Protesty po wyroku TK: Przeciwko czemu buntują się młodzi Polacy. Rzeczpospolita. https://www.rp.pl/Plus-Minus/201109588-Protesty-po-wyroku-TK-Przeciwko-czemu-buntuja-sie-mlodzi-Polacy.html
Simpson, M. (1997). Information inequality and democracy in the new world order. In M. Midlarsky (Ed.), Inequality, Democracy, and Economic Development (pp. 156–176). Cambridge University Press,
Tocqueville, A. (1954). Democracy in America. Vol. 1. Village Books.
UNESCO (n.d.). Media and Information Literacy. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/media-development/media-literacy/mil-as-composite-concept/
UNESCO (2011). Media and Information Literacy Curriculum for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO.
Vargo, Ch. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: a big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media and Society 20(5), 2028–2049.
Wallmark, R. (2013). Media Literacy as a Way to Build Democracy. In U. Carlsson & S. H. Culver (Eds.), Media and Information Literacy and Intercultural Dialogue. MILID Yearbook 2013 (pp. 399–403). UNITWIN Cooperation Programme on Media and Information Literacy and Intercultural Dialogue and NORDICOM
Wenzel, M. (2018). News Consumption and Political Party Preferences in Poland. Political Preferences, 18, 57–74.
Yoon, J-H. (2019). Information equality and democracy in the information age: Cross-national time-series analyses. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 4(2), 176–191.
University of Wroclaw Poland
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1958-3683
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
