European Elections in Croatia
Abstract
This text discusses the results of European elections in Croatia. It reaches the conclusion that voters, unhappy with the economic situation, punished the ruling social democratic coalition which suffered a heavy defeat. On the other hand, election results prove the recovery of HDZ, the opposition, centre-right party. It is also obvious that most Croatian citizens do not believe that European elections are important enough to warrant voting. Euroscepticism in Croatia is on the rise because citizens see no obvious benefits from joining the European Union. On the contrary, it is becoming increasingly clear that, in its first year as a member, Croatia will pay more funds into EU budget than it will receive from it. It is evident that direct elections of European Parliament members did not succeed in strengthening EU's legitimacy in the eyes of Croatian voters, and that European elections are actually of secondary importance.
Key words:
European elections, Croatia, European Union, Euroscepticism
References
Blühdorn I. (2011), Das postdemokratische Doppeldilemma. Politische Repräsentation in der simulativen Demokratie, [in:] Linden M., Thaa W. (eds.): Krise und Reform politischer Repräsentation, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Bofinger P., Habermas J., Nida-Rümelin J. (2012), Einspruch gegen die Fassadendemokratie, FAZ vom 4. August 2012.
Cipek T. (2007), Institucionalni dizajn i demokratski deficit Europske unije, „Društvena istraživanja”, vol. 16 (4-5): 851-865.
Čular G. (2014), Političko predstavništvo u Hrvatskoj: predstoji li korjenita promjena stranačkog sustava?, „Političke analize”, IV, no. 13: 3-11.
Dahrendorf R. (2002), Die Krisen der Demokratie. Ein Gespräch mit Antonio Polito, München: C. H. Beck.
Hirsch M., Voigt R. (2009), Der Staat in der Postdemokratie. Staat, Politik, Demokratie und Recht im neueren französischen Denken, Stuttgart: Steiner.
Hix S., Hagemann S. (2009), Could changing the electoral rules fix European parliament elections?, „Politique européene”, vol. 2 (28): 37-52.
Höpner M., Schäfer A. (2010), Grenzen der Integration – wie die Intensivierung der Wirtschaftsintegration zur Gefahr für die politische Integration wird, „Integration”, 1.
Jörke D. (2010), Buergerbetailigung in der Postdemokratie, „Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte”, vol.1-2, http://www.bpb.de/apuz/33569/buergerbeteiligung-in-der-postdemokratie?p=all, (19.04.2013).
Jurčić L. (2012), Europska unija: Hrvatska ante portas, „Ekonomski pregled”, 63 (12): 763-790.
Katz R., Mair P. (2009), The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement, „Perspectives on Politics”, vol. 4(7): 753-766.
Knaus G. (2012), Croatian EU Accession and the Fate of its Neighbors. [in:] V. Džihić, D. Hamilton (ed.) Unifinished Bussnies: The Western Balkans and the International Comunity. Washington: Center for Transantlantic Relations, John Hopkins University.
Krastev I. (2013), Europe’s Democracy Paradox, „Transit”, no. 44. http://www.iwm.at/readlisten-watch/transit-online/europes-democracy-paradox/ (28.04.2014).
Krastev I. (2013), In Mistrust we Trust. Can Democracy Survive When We Don’t Trust Our Leaders, New York: TED Conferences.
Krippner G. R. (2011), Capitalizing on Crisis. The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance, Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Möllers Ch. (2008): Demokratie – Zumutungen und Versprechen, Berlin: Klaus Wagenbach.
Mudde C. (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde C. (2014), Electoral Winners and Political Losers in the Right-Wing Eurosceptic Camp, „Open Democracy”, www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/cas-mudde/electoralwinners-and-political-losers-in-rightwing-eurosceptic-camp (22.06.2014).
Münkler H. (2010), Regierungsversagen, Staatsversagen und die Krise der Demokratie, „Berliner Republik”, http://www.b-republik.de/aktuelle-ausgabe/regierungsversagenstaatsversagen-und-die-krise-der-demokratie. (10.06.2014).
Nullmeier F. (2010), Kritik neoliberaler Menschen- und Gesellschaftbilder und Konsequenzen für ein neues Verständnis von „sozialer Gerechtigkeit“, WISO Diskurs, Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Sack D. (2011), Postdemokratie, Ironie und Gerechtigkeit – zum Umgang mit dem Enttäuschungspotenzia demokratischer Herrschaft, „Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft”, vol. 40 (1): 49-65.
Schäfer A. (2009), Krisentheorien der Demokratie: Unregierbarkeit, Spätkapitalismus, Postdemokratie, „Der moderne Staat”, no. 1: 159-183.
Schäfer A. (2010), Die Folgen sozialer Ungleichheit für die Demokratie in Westeuropa, „Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft”, no. 4: 131–156.
Streek W. (2011), The Crisis in Context. Democratic Capitalism and Its Contradictions, MPFIfG Discussion Paper, 11/15, Köln: MPFIfG.
Vogt P. (2011), Kontingenz und Zufall. Eine Ideen- und Begriffsgeschichte, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Weidenfeld W., Wessels W. (2006), Europa von A bis Z. Taschenbuch der europäischen Integration, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Zürn M. (2011), Die Rückkehr der Demokratiefrage. Perspektiven demokratischen Regierens und die Rolle der Politikwissenschaft, „Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik”, no. 6: 63-74.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
