Obywatelskie kompetencje polityczne a wybrane motywy podejmowania decyzji wyborczych
Abstract
Civil political competency and chosen reasons when taking electoral decisions
Civil political competency, but especially public trust are the basis of development of the civil society. Level of civil political competency also influence the electoral behaviour. In a research made in the end of 2014 we asked about Polish people civil political competency and about chosen reasons when taking electoral decisions. The group who declares an absence in the election or not taking big care about their electoral decisions and also have lack of skills to determine on which place on the left-right line they are, give evidence of a very low level of civil political competencies. Less important for them are programs and future plans presented by the politicians and political parties and also how they realize them (or not). When taking an electoral decision on the local level, this group take a lesser degree of care then other voters about the local elections candidates (for mayors, council member etc.) memberships to the political parties.
Key words:
political competences, electoral behavior, electoral decisions, political parties, parliamentary elections, local elections
References
Adamczyk M. (2013), Wprowadzenie do teorii kapitału społecznego, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Bezanson K. (2006), Gender and the Limits of Social Capital, “Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology”2006, vol. 43(4): 427-443.
Godlewski T. (2008), Obywatelskie kompetencje polityczne, [w:] Danuta Karnowska (red.), Demokracja w Polsce po 2005 roku, Toruń, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Habermas J. (2005), Faktyczność i obowiązywanie. Teoria dyskursu wobec zagadnień prawa i demokratycznego państwa prawnego, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Held D. (2010), Modele demokracji, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Krastew I. (2013), Demokracja nieufnych. Eseje polityczne, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Krastew I. (2014), Więcej tajemnicy. I. Krastew w rozmowie z J. Żakowskim, „Polityka” 5-11 lutego 2014.
Król M. (2014), Byliśmy głupi. M. Król w rozmowie z G. Sroczyńskim, „Gazeta Wyborcza” 8-9 lutego 2014.
Lalman D., Oppenhaimer J., Świstak P. (1994), Formalna teoria wyboru racjonalnego. Kumulatywne nauki polityczne, „Studia Socjologiczne” 1994, nr 3/4.
Lewenstein B. (2006), Społeczeństwo rodzin czy obywateli – kapitał społeczny Polaków okresu transformacji, „Societas/Communitas” 2006, nr 1.
Putnam R.D. (2008), Samotna gra w kręgle. Upadek i odrodzenie wspólnot lokalnych w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Raciborski J. (2011), Obywatelstwo w perspektywie socjologicznej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Rosanvallon P. (2011), Kontrdemokracja. Polityka w dobie nieufności, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
Schumpeter J. (1995), Kapitalizm. Socjalizm. Demokracja, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Szczegóła L. (2013), Bierność obywateli. Apatia polityczna w teorii demokratycznej partycypacji, Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Theiss M. (2007), Krewni-Znajomi-Obywatele. Kapitał społeczny a lokalna polityka społeczna, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
