Preferowane wartości podstawowe a zachowania wyborcze w elekcji parlamentarnej 2015 roku
Abstract
The Preferred Basic Values versus Voting Behaviors in the 2015 Parliamentary ElectionPrzeprowadzone badania mieszczą się w nurcie poszukiwań psychologicznych determinant i czynników różnicujących zachowania wyborcze i preferencje ideologiczne polskich wyborców. Wiele studiów empirycznych dowodzi istotnych związków pomiędzy preferowanymi przez jednostkę wartościami, a jej zachowaniami, co znalazło również swoje stabilne miejsce w przestrzeni badań zachowań wyborczych. Celem przedstawianego artykułu jest analiza systemu wartości wyższego rzędu w ramach koncepcji Shaloma Schwartza elektoratów w wyborach parlamentarnych 2015 roku oraz osób o różnych autoidentyfikacjach ideologicznych. Uzyskane wyniki zwracają uwagę na kilka interesujących kwestii, m.in. pokazują spójną dla wszystkich elektoratów najsłabszą preferencję dla umacniania siebie czy najsilniej kontrastujący z pozostałymi elektorami system wartości wyborców ugrupowania Kukiz`15.
Key words:
basic values, electoral behaviors, 2015 parliamentary election
References
Arian A., Shamir M. (1990). The Elections in Israel: 1988. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220
Beierlein, C., Davidov, E., Cieciuch J., Rammstedt, B., Schwartz S.H. (2014). The Schwartz Values Short Scale. An economic measurement tool for cross-cultural research. Referat na 28th International
Congress of Applied Psychology, Paryż, Francja
Caprara, G.V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C., (2006). Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1-26.
Cieciuch, J. (2013). Pomiar wartości w zmodyfikowanym modelu wartości Shaloma Schwartza. Psychologia Społeczna, 8, 1(24), 22-41.
Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881–896.
Jałowiecki, S. (1979). Struktura systemu wartości. Stadium zróżnicowań międzygenetycznych, Warszawa: PWN
Leimgruber, P. (2011). Values and votes: the indirect effect of personal values on voting behawior. Swiss Political Science Review, 17, 107-127.
Liebman C.S., Don-Yehiya E. (1984). Religion and Politics in Israel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Nenovsky, N. (1987). Law and values. Moscow: Progress.
Ramos, A. (2006). Social values dynamics and socio-economic development Portugese. Journal of Social Science, 3, 35-64.
Rokeach M. (1973), The Nature of Human Values, New York: The Free Press.
Schwartz S.H., Caprara G.V., Vecchione M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421-452.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249–288.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 1—65.
Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Online readings in psychology and culture, http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=orpc (dostęp: 29.04.2016).
Schwartz, S.H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.
Schwartz, S.H., Sagie, G. (2000). Values consensus and importance: a ross-national study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31, 465-497.
Schwartz, Sh.H. (2007A). Basic Personal Values. Report to the National Election Studies Board Based on the 2006 NES Pilot Study. ANES website.
Schwartz, S.H. (2007B). Basic Human Values: theory, methods and applications. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 47(4), 929-968.
Schwartz, S. H., (1996), Value priorities and behawior. Applying a theory of integrated value systems, Revista Psicodebate: Psicología, Cultura y Sociedad, 2, 119-144.
Vecchione, M, Caprara, G, Dentale, F., Schwartz, S. H. (2013). Voting and Values: Reciprocal Effects over Time. Political Psychology, 34(4), 465-485.
Wojtasik, W. (2012). Sukces Ruchu Palikota w świetle czynników możliwego sukcesu politycznego (Political Opportunity Structure). Political Preferences, (3), 159-174.
Zarzycka, B., Dawidowicz, M., Koziatek, E. (2007). Typy samoświadomości a preferencja wartości [w:] P. Francuz, W. Otrębski (red.). Studia z psychologii w KUL, tom 14. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
University of Silesia in Katowice Poland
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
