Niedowierzanie i szok czy zdrowy rozsądek, czyli rekcja światowych mediów na wyniki brytyjskiego Brexitu
Abstract
Disbelief and shock or common sense, the reaction of the world's media on the results of the British BrexitThis article presents a new phenomenon, as yet unknown in the European Union. Namely to leave the country with Community structures. The first has made the United Kingdom, carried out by 23 June 2016. referendum. Slightly more than half the population of the British opted for the order to leave the European Union.
Media the day after the announcement of the results Brexit began to comment on them. Not only in the UK but around the world could read in the newspapers that no one had expected. For many, it was shock and disbelief. I wonder what will be next? As further European Union will function without this power? What consequences await the British starting from the structures of the European Union? Will we see a domino effect in which other countries will leave the Community?
Key words:
Brexit, the European Union, media, referendum
References
"Wszyscy za to zapłacimy". Media o Brexicie. http://www.wsensie.pl/swiat/14870-wszyscy-za-to-zaplacimy-media-o-brexicie (9.11/2016).
Brexit w pigułce. Brytyjczycy decydują, czy pozostać w UE. http://www.tvp.info/25884847/brexit-w-pigulce-brytyjczycy-decyduja-czy-pozostac-w-ue,
(8.11.2016).
Brexit. Co to znaczy i jak do niego doszło?. http://www.newsweek.pl/swiat/brexit-co-to-znaczy-i-jakie-sa-wyniki-referendum,artykuly,387932,1.html (8.11.2016).
Brytyjczycy o Brexit pytali Google po referendum. Pierwszych pięć pytań rozkłada na łopatki. http://tvn24bis.pl/ze-swiata,75/brytyjczycy-nie-wiedzieli-czego-dotyczy-brexit,655697.html (12.11.2016).
Bułgaria: Media o Brexicie: populizm wygrał ze zdrowym rozsądkiem. http://www.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/955017,bulgaria-media-o-brexicie-populizm-wygral-ze-zdrowym-rozsadkiem.html (10.11.2016).
Dz.Urz.UE 2016 C 202, Traktat o Unii Europejskiej.
Gwałtowna reakcja Berlina. Unia to już tylko kraje założycielskie. http://niezalezna.pl/82346-gwaltowna-reakcja-berlina-unia-juz-tylko-kraje-zalozycielskie (11.11.2016).
Jakie życie po Brexicie? Zastanawiają się zwykli Brytyjczycy. http://wgospodarce.pl/informacje/27003-jakie-zycie-po-brexicie-zastanawiaja-sie-zwykli-brytyjczycy (12.11.2016).
Kolejni kandydaci do opuszczenia UE, https://wolnemedia.net/kolejni-kandydaci-do-opuszczenia-ue/ (1.05.2017).
Media o Brexicie: populizm wygrał ze zdrowym rozsądkiem. http://www.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/955017,bulgaria-media-o-brexicie-populizm-wygral-ze-zdrowym-rozsadkiem.html (10. 11. 2016).
Media w Wielkiej Brytanii pytają, co Brexit będzie oznaczał dla zwykłych ludzi. http://www.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/954931,co-brexit-bedzie-oznaczal-dla-zwyklych-ludzi.html (12.11.2016).
Mrozowski, T. (2016). Brexit z perspektywy Niemiec. Poznań: Instytut Zachodni.
Niemiecka prasa o Brexicie: Berlin znów chce przewodzić. http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/niemiecka-prasa-o-brexicie-berlin-znow-chce-przewodzic/ds8001 (10.11.2016).
Niemieckie media: Brexit ma też swoje zalety. http://www.kresy.pl/wydarzenia,europa-zachodnia?zobacz/niemieckie-media-brexit-ma-tez-swoje-zalety (10.11.2016).
Prasa niemiecka: Rasizm po referendum - Polacy celem nr 1. http://www.dw.com/pl/prasa-niemiecka-rasizm-po-referendum-polacy-celem-nr-1/a-19367739 ( 11.11.2016).
Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?. http://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/should-the-united-kingdom-remain-a-member-of-the-eu-or-leave-the-eu/ (8.11.2016).
Sieroń, A. (2016). Brexit – apokalipsa czy zbawienie. Wrocław: Instytut Edukacji Ekonomicznej im. Ludwiga von Misesa. Wrocław.
Światowe media o Brexicie: szok i niedowierzanie. „Die Welt”: Niemcy staną się teraz wiodącą potęgą w Europie. http://wpolityce.pl/swiat/298082-swiatowe-media-o-brexicie-szok-i-niedowierzanie-die-welt-niemcy-stana-sie-teraz-wiodaca-potega-w-europie (9.11.2016).
Walków, M. (2016). „Tragiczny podział”, „Narodziny nowej Brytanii”, „Kto następny?” - Brexit na okładkach dzisiejszych gazet. http://businessinsider.com.pl/media/okladki-gazet-z-25-czerwca-2016-po-brexicie/csmvx5m ( 9.11.2016).
Węgierskie media o Brexicie: to koszmar senny. http://www.rp.pl/Brexit/160629469-Wegierskie-media-o-Brexicie-to-koszmar-senny.html#ap-1 (11.11.2016).
Akademia Sztuki Wojennej Poland
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.