Indywidualne i społeczne konteksty recepcji mediów. Doświadczenie niemieckie
Abstract
Personal and social contexts of media reception. German experiences
The fourth question in Lasswell’s model (to whom?) assumes a study and an analysis of media’s publicity and broader reception of the content. This reception should go personally or socially.
The personal contexts include amongst others lifecycle and physical and mental limitations. The age plays an important role in media reception. The youth watches less television than the older people, who, on the contrary, are less likely to use electronic forms of communication.
Another pattern here is that the older the man is, the longer he reads newspapers and magazines during the day. Important limitations in media reception are due to physical obstacles such as: poor sight and impaired hearing whereas the most significant mental obstacle is depression.
The article presents also the problems of reception in a group, that is, when a person watches television or listens to the radio accompanied by other people. The presence of the others modifies all the process, there is a possibility of conversation and commenting the content. A spectacular example of reception in the group is watching football matches. Media can also be received in public space, open for everyone. Nowadays, public spaces are characterized by - as called by the scientists - a communication tyranny. Phone conversations are omnipresent and disturbs everybody. This is a kind of psychological pathology. Media reception depends on the culture, both personal and in a general sense. In Europe, there are differences between North and South that can be explained, among others, by religious factors (Protestantism vs. Catholicism). In the article- as practice shows – we mentioned main German studies, but also in a lesser extent - American and Polish ones. All of them relate to a more general problem of mediatisation and everyday life.
Key words:
media reception, Personal reception, reception in a group, media vs. culture
References
Beck, K. (2012). Das Mediensystem Deutschlands. Strukturen, Märkte, Regulierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bentele, G., Brosius H.-B., & Jarren, O. (Hrsg.) (2013). Lexikon Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bilandzic, H., Schramm, H., & Matthes, J. (2015). Medienrezeptionsforschung. Konstanz: UVK.
Blum, R, Bonfadelli, H., Imhof K., & Jarren O. (Hrsg.) (2011). Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Dillman Carpentier, F.R., Brown, J.D., Bertocci, M., Silk, J.S., Forbes, E.E., & Dahl, R.E. (2008). Sad kids, sad media. Applying mood management theory to depressed adolescents use of media. Media Psychology, 11 (1): 143–66.
Dosch, E., & Beneche, B. (2004). Wenn aus Bildern Worte werden. München: Bayerischer Rundfunk.
Eimeren, B., & Ridder, C.-M. (2011). Trends in der Nutzung und Bewertung der Medien 1970 bis 2000. Media Perspektiven, 1: 2–15.
Elvest, E., & Blekesavne, A. (2008). Newspaper readers in Europe: A. Multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication, 23 (4): 425–47.
Feierabend, S., & Klinger, W. (2011). Was Kinder sehen? Mediennutzung und soziokulturelle Verortung bei Kinder. Media Perspektiven, 4: 170–81.
Gattringer, K., & Klinger, W. (2011). Radionutzung in Deutschland mit positiven Trend. Media Perspektiven, 10: 442–57.
Geharow, V., Döreling, K., Sommer, K., & Dunlog, S. (2012). Antagonistic and Synergetic Impacts of Conversation on Nonpersuasive Media Effects. Communication Research, 41(4): 578–602.
Goffman, E. (1974). Das Indywiduum im öffentlichen Austausch. Mikrostudien zur öffentlichen Ordnung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Goffman, E. (2009). Interaktion im öffentlichen Raum. Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus.
Hagen, M. (2006). Ganz Ohr Sein-Zuhörförderung als Beitrag zu ästhetischer Bildung. Tutzing: Evangelische Akademie.
Hartmann, M. (2013). Domestizierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Hasebrink, U., & Krotz, F. (1993). Wie Nutzen Zuschauer das Fernsehen? Media Perspektiven, 11/12: 515–27.
Hasebrink, U., & Herzog, A. (2009). Mediennutzung im internationalen Vergleich. W: Hans-Bredow Institut (Hrsg.). Internationales Handbuch Medien.
Hepp, A. (1998). Fernsehaneignung und Alltagsgespräche. Fernsehnutzung aus der Perspektive der Cultural Studies. Wiesbaden.
Höflich, J.R. (2010). Got – es klingelt. Studien zur Mediatisierung des öffentlichen Raums. Das Mobiltelefon. W: M. Hartmann, & A.Hepp (Hrsg.). Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Huber, N. (2004). Ohne Bilder im Bilde. Eine qualitative Studie zur Mediennutzung und Medienbewertung von blinden Menschen in Deutschland. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Kessler, B., & Kupferschmitt, T. (2012). Fernsehen in Gemeinschaft. Analysen zu Konstelation der Fernsehnutzung. Media Perspektiven, 12: 623–34.
Klemm, M. (2001). Schprachandlungsmuster. W: W. Holly, W. Püschel, & J. Bergemann (Hrsg.). Der sprechende Zuschauer. Wie wir uns Fernsehen kommunikativ aneignen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Michalczyk, S. (2015). Jednostka i społeczeństwo w świecie mediów. Klasyczne i współczesne idee w teoriach średniego zasięgu. Katowice: Wyd. Śląsk.
Michalczyk, S. (2008). Stare i nowe idee w teorii Uses and Gratifications. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, 3-4: 29–44.
Mikułowski Pomorski, J. (1999). Komunikacja międzykulturowa. Kraków: Akademia Ekonomiczna.
Mikułowski Pomorski, J. (2006). Jak narody porozumiewają się z sobą w komunikacji międzykulturowej i komunikowaniu medialnym. Kraków: Universitas.
Nathanson, A.I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parential television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45 (2): 201–20.
Neckermann, G. (2001). Das Kinopublikum 1993-2000. Besucherstruktur, Besucherverhalten und Image des Kino. Media Perspektiven, 10: 514–23.
Schefer, R.M. (2010). Die Ordnung der Klänge. Eine kulturgeschichte des Hörens. Mainz: Schott Musik.
Scherer, K.R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, J. (red) (2001). Appraisal processes in emotions: Theory, methods, research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tokarski, J. (red). (1980). Słownik Wyrazów Obcych. Warszawa: PWN.
Sturnquist, D.M. (2006). Mobile phone and driving. New York: Nova Publishers.
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach Poland
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
