Abraham, R.J. (2010). Saving Buckley. Creating a Stable Campaign Finance Framework. Columbia Law Review, 110(4): 1078–122.
Google Scholar
Adamany, D.W., & Agree, G.E. (1975). Political Money. A Strategy for Campaign Financing in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Alexander, H.E., & Haggerty, B.A. (1981). The Federal Election Campaign Act. After a Decade of Political Reform. Los Angeles, CA: Citizens’ Research Foundation.
Google Scholar
Amendments to Federal Election Campaign Act 88 Stat. 1263, 1974.
Google Scholar
Amendments to Federal Election Campaign Act 90 Stat. 475, 1976.
Google Scholar
Amendments to Federal Election Campaign Act 93 Stat. 1339, 1980.
Google Scholar
Bailey, T.A. (1981). Presidential Saints and Sinners, New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Bell, C.W. (2015). A Constitutional Amendment Allowing Broader Campaign – Finance Reform Would Not Criminize Political Satire. St. Mary’s Law Journal, 47(1): 187–217.
Google Scholar
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (An Act to Amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to Provide Bipartisan Campaign Reform) 116 Stat. 81, 2002.
Google Scholar
Black, S.N. (2015). Money Motives. Finding the Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Campaign Finance Regulation. Oklahoma City University Law Review, 40(2): 481–501.
Google Scholar
Blumenthal, S. (1982). The Permanent Campaign. New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Boatright R.G. (2014). Interest Groups and Campaign Finance Reform in the United States and Canada. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo 424 U.S. 1, 1976.
Google Scholar
CFI, President Trump, with RNC Help, Raised More Small Donor Money than President Obama; As Much as Clinton and Sanders Combined. http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/17-02-21/President_Trump_with_RNC_Help_Raised_More_Small_Donor_Money_than_President_Obama_As_Much_As_Clinton_and_Sanders_Combined.aspx (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Citizens United v. F.E.C.558 U.S. 310.
Google Scholar
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. F.E.C. 518 U.S. 604, 1996.
Google Scholar
Corrado, A. (2010). Fund-raising Strategies in the 2008 Presidential Campaign. In: J.A. Thurber, & C.J. Nelson (eds.), Campaigns and Elections American Style. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 105–35.
Google Scholar
Corrado, A. (2005). Money and Politics. A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law. In: A. Corrado, et. al. (eds.), The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 7-47.
Google Scholar
CRP, 2012 Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php?cycle=2012&disp=D&type=V&superonly=N (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, 2014 Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php?cycle=2014&disp=D&type=V (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, 2016 Outside Spending, by Candidate. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php?disp=C (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, 2016 Presidential Race. https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16 (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, 527s: Advocacy Group Spending, https://www.opensecrets.org/527s/ (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, Cost of Election. https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/cost.php (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, Donor Demographics. https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/donordemographics.php (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, Outside Spending. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/ (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, SuperPACs. https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/superpacs.php (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
CRP, Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions. https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Davis v. F.E.C. 554 U.S. 724, 2008.
Google Scholar
Drutman, L. (2016). The Rise of Dark Money. In: A.J. Cigler, B.A. Loomis, & A.J. Nownes (eds.), Interest Group Politics, Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Farrar-Myers, F.A., Dwyre, D. (2007). Limits, and Loopholes: The Quest for Money, Free Speech, and Fair Elections. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Farias, C. (2015). Americans Agree on One Thing: Citizens United Is Terrible. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/citizens-united-john-roberts_us_560acd0ce4b0af3706de129d (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
F.E.C. v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee 533 U.S. 431, 2001.
Google Scholar
F.E.C. v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life 479 U.S. 238, 1986.
Google Scholar
F.E.C. v. National Conservative Political Action Committee 470 U.S. 480, 1985.
Google Scholar
F.E.C. v. Wisconsin Right to Life 551 U.S. 449, 2007.
Google Scholar
Federal Election Campaign Act (An Act to Promote Fair Practices in the Conduct of Election Campaigns for Federal Political Offices, and for Other Purposes) 86 Stat. 3, 1971.
Google Scholar
Federal Corrupt Practices Act, 43 Stat. 1070, 1925.
Google Scholar
FEC, Coordinated Communications and Independent Expenditures. https://transition.fec.gov/pages/brochures/indexp.shtml#IE (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
FEC, National Political Party Committee Summary. http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Foerstel, H. N. (1997). Free Expression and Censorship in America. An Encyclopedia, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar
Garrett, S. R., & Whitaker, P. L. (2016). Coordinated Party Expenditures in Federal Elections. An Overview. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22644.pdf (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Gerken, H. K. (2014). The Real Problem with Citizens United. Campaign Finance, Dark Money, and Shadow Parties. Marquette Law Review, 97(4): 903–23.
Google Scholar
Gold, M. (2016). Nearly $100 Million in SuperPAC Money Couldn’t Save Jeb Bush. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/20/nearly-100-million-in-super-pac-money-couldnt-save-jeb-bush/?utm_term=.b422ba014fab (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D.A. (2016). Asymmetric Politics. Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Handlesman J.B., How Much Justice Can You Afford?The New Yorker Collection, http://www.art.com/products/p15063434817-sa-i6847842/j-b-handelsman-you-have-a-pretty-good-case-mr-pitkin-how-much-justice-can-you-afford-new-yorker-cartoon.htm (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Hohenstein, K. (2007). Coining Corruption. The Making of the American Campaign Finance System. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar
Janda, K., Berry, J.M., & Goldman, J. (1995). The Challenge of Democracy. Government in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Jones, N. L. (2016). Citizens United Round II. Campaign Finance, Disclosure, the First Amendment, and Expanding Exemptions and Loopholes for Corporate Influence on Elections. Denver Law Review, 93 (3): 749– 96.
Google Scholar
Judis, J. B., & Teixeira, R. (2004). The Emerging Democratic Majority. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar
Laidler, P., & Turek, M. (2016). Cena demokracji. Finansowanie federalnych kampanii wyborczych w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar
Laidler, P. (2016). Prawo finansowania federalnych kampanii wyborczych w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki z perspektywy debaty politycznej między republikanami a demokratami. In: R. Kłosowicz, et al. (eds.), Konstytucjonalizm, doktryny, partie polityczne. Księga dedykowana Profesorowi Andrzejowi Ziębie, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 479–506.
Google Scholar
Magleby, D.B., & Squires, N.C.(2004). Party Money in the 2002 Congressional Elections. In: D. B. Magleby, & J. Q. Monson (eds.), The Last Hurrah? Soft Money and Issue Advocacy in the 2002 Congressional Elections, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 36–62.
Google Scholar
Maisel, S.L. (1991). Political Partiesand Elections in the United States. An Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
Google Scholar
Malbin, M.J. (2003). Life After the Reform. When the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Meets Politics. Boston, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Malbin, M.J. (2009). Small Donors, Large Donors and the Internet: The Case for Public Funding After Obama. http://www.cfinst.org/president/pdf/PresidentialWorkingPaper_April09.pdf (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Mann, T.E., & Corrado, A. (2014). Party Polarization and Campaign Finance. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Mann--and-Corrad_Party-Polarization-and-Campaign-Finance.pdf (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Mann, T.E. (2003). The Rise of Soft Money. In: A. Corrado, T. E. Mann, & T. Potter (eds.), Inside the Campaign Finance Battle. Court Testimony on the New Reforms. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 17–39.
Google Scholar
McConnell v. F.E.C. 540 U.S. 93, 2003.
Google Scholar
McCutcheon v. U.S. 572 U.S. 12-536, 2014.
Google Scholar
Mutch, R. (2014). Buying the Vote. A History of Campaign Finance Reform, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Mutch, R. (2016). Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs To Know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Newberry v. U.S. 256 U.S. 232, 1921.
Google Scholar
Ornstein, N. J., Mann, T. E., Malbin, M.J., Rugg, A., & Wakeman, R. (2015). Vital Statistics on Congress, Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Google Scholar
Oświecimski, K. (2012). Grupy interesu i lobbing w amerykańskim systemie politycznym. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
Google Scholar
Oświecimski, K. (2011). Finansowanie kampanii wyborczych w USA – rozwój regulacji, ich konsekwencje i aspekty polityczne. Horyzonty Polityki, 2: 241–95.
Google Scholar
La Raja, R.J, & Schaffner, B.F. (2015). Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
La Raja, R.J. (2008). Small Change: Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Regan, M.D. (2016). What Does Voter Turnout Tells Us about the 2016 Election? http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/voter-turnout-2016-elections/ (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-state-union-address (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Restuccia, A., & Vogel, K.P. (2015). Steyer Starts as Liberal Donors Gather. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/tom-steyer-liberal-donors-democracy-alliance-116935 (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Samples, J.C. (2008). The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Smith, M.M., & Powell, L. (2014). Dark Money, Super PACs and the 2012 Election. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar
SpeechNow.Org v. F.E.C. 559 F.3d 686, 2010.
Google Scholar
Thurber, J.A. (2010). Understanding the Dynamics and the
Google Scholar
Transformation of American Campaigns. In: J.A. Thurber, & C.J. Nelson (eds.), Campaigns and Elections American Style, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Toner, M.E., & Trainer, K.E. (2015). The Money Game. Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and Their Impact on 2014 and Beyond. In: L.J. Sabato (ed.), The Surge. 2014’s Big GOP Win and What It Means For the Next Presidential Election, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 111–28.
Google Scholar
Torres-Spelliscy, C. (2017). Neil Gorsuch Understands Campaign Finance – And That’s the Problem. https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/neil-gorsuch-understands-campaign-finance-–-and-that’s-problem (15.06.2017).
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2013a). Narodowe Konwencje Partyjne w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Czy są dziś potrzebne? In: A. Małek, & P. Napierała (eds.), Stany Zjednoczone wczoraj i dziś. Wybrane zagadnienia społeczno-polityczne. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 111–33.
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2013b). Amerykański system finansowania wyborów i jego konsekwencje. In: A. Małek, & P. Napierała (eds.), Stany Zjednoczone wczoraj i dziś. Wybrane zagadnienia społeczno-polityczne. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 167–95.
Google Scholar
Tyler, D.E. (1999). The Unions and the Democrats. An Enduring Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.L., & Tausanovitch, A.(2013). Reflections on Campaign Finance and the 2012 Election. Willamette Law Review, 49(4): 541–61.
Google Scholar
Weissman, S.R., & Hasan, R. (2006). BCRA and the 527 Groups. In: M.J. Malbin (ed.), The Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 79–110.
Google Scholar
Whitehouse, S. (2017). Captured: The Corporate Inflitration of American Democracy. New York, NY: New Press.
Google Scholar