The Social Perception of Political Corruption vs the Evaluation of Honesty of Political Authorities



Abstract

Political corruption is a multidimensional phenomenon, concerning political authorities at all possible levels. It is defined as the abuse of power by political entities in order to obtain personal benefits in the form of greater power or wealth. It shows that the subject of political corruption is not only material benefits but also the mechanisms of increasing the influence or special treatment. The character of political corruption results in the public interest in it, enhanced by the public character of the individuals it refers to. It is also influenced by the processual character of the phenomenon itself, but first of all by the specific attractive nature of corruption in social awareness. The article presents the findings of research concerning opinions on political corruption. Its goal is to study the relationships between the respondents' opinions on political authorities' honesty and the determinants of corrupt phenomena. The main research question is: Is there any relationship between the person's opinion on political authorities' honesty and the person's perception of political corruption? The hypothesis related to the question assumes there is a connection between the perception of political authorities' honesty and the evaluation of components of political corruption. The research is part of a research project carried out by the IPSO ORDO Academic Foundation on the perception of the corruption phenomenon in the public domain.

 

Key words:

corruption, political corruption, political power, honesty


CBOS 63/2017. Opinie na temat korupcji w Polsce. Komunikat z badań nr 63/2017. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Publicznej.

Golding, P., & Elliott, P. (1979). Making the news. London: Longman.

Jakubowski, R. (2016). Cechy charakterystyczne korupcji i sposoby jej zapobiegania w administracji. W: M. Myśliwiec, & A. Turska-Kawa (red.). Korupcja w administracji. Katowice: Fundacja Akademicka IPSO ORDO.

Issacharoff, S. (2010). On political corruption. Harvard Law Review, 124 (1), 118–42.

Jarosz, M. (2004). Władza, przywileje, korupcja. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Philp, M. (2011). Conceptualizing political corruption. W: A. J. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston (red.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (Vol. 1), New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Plecka, D., Turska-Kawa, A., & Wojtasik, W. (2013). Obywatelskie kompetencje polityczne. Kultura i Edukacja, 96 (3), 73–97.

Robak, A., & Czaja, M. (2015). Korupcja-zarys istoty zjawiska. W: A. Turska-Kawa, & M. Czaja (red.). Postawy wobec korupcji w samorządzie terytorialnym. Katowice: Fundacja Akademicka IPSO ORDO.

Schedler, A. (2013). The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sitek, B. (2012). Korupcja wyborcza w świetle ustaw municypalnych antycznego Rzymu na tle rozwiązań normatywnych w polskim systemie prawnym. Journal of Modern Science, 4 (15), 337–59.

Sroka, A. (2014). Rozliczalność w badaniach jakości demokracji (na przykładzie Polski i Hiszpanii). Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.

Szostok, P. (2016). Skuteczna komunikacja samorządowa remedium na kryzys wywołany korupcją. W: M. Myśliwiec, & A. Turska-Kawa (red.). Korupcja w administracji. Katowice: Fundacja Akademicka IPSO ORDO.

Turska-Kawa, A. (2015). Psychologiczne determinanty korupcji politycznej. W: A. Turska-Kawa, & M. Czaja (red.). Postawy wobec korupcji w samorządzie terytorialnym. Katowice: Fundacja Akademicka IPSO ORDO.

Uliasz, J. (2011). Prawne aspekty zwalczania korupcji politycznej. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 5 (1), 143–55.

Wojtasik, W. (2015). Niepewność jako czynnik przeciwdziałania korupcji. W: A. Turska-Kawa, & M. Czaja (red.). Postawy wobec korupcji w samorządzie terytorialnym. Katowice: Fundacja Akademicka IPSO ORDO.

Wojtasik W. (2017). Rola korupcji politycznej w procesie rozliczalności wertykalnej na poziomie lokalnym (maszynopis).


Published : 2017-12-20


WojtasikW. (2017). The Social Perception of Political Corruption vs the Evaluation of Honesty of Political Authorities. Political Preferences, (17). Retrieved from https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PP/article/view/6226

Waldemar Wojtasik  waldemar.wojtasik@us.edu.pl
University of Silesia in Katowice  Poland



The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.