News consumption and political party preferences in Poland
The objective of this paper is to determine the scale of influence of the media (both traditional and social) on party preferences. The complicated contemporary media ecosystem, in which the boundaries between traditional and internet media are blurred (internet versions of newspapers), news coverage is increasingly de-professionalized (emergence of civic journalism), verification of information becomes increasingly problematic (fake news) leads to a number of theoretical and methodological challenges. Theoretically, the paper uses the model in which mass media act as a factor triggering the emergence of latent views. Empirically, the effort is undertaken to cover the whole universe of information sources, including both print and electronic media, both traditional and internet sources. The analysis determines citizens’ sources of information, tracks consistencies in selecting particular categories of sources (thus outlining ‘information bubbles’), correlates sources with party preferences and measures generalized attitudes to media categories. The study is undertaken on a sample representative for adult Polish population, fielded with CAWI methodology.
mass media, political attitudes, news, public opinion
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In: C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: D. Apter (Ed.) Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–61). New York: Free Press.
Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Introduction. In: L. Diamond, & L. Morlino (Eds.), Assessing the quality of democracy (pp. ix–xlii). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dobek-Ostrowska, B, Głowacki, M., Jakubowicz, K., & Sükösd, M. (Eds.) (2010). Comparative Media Systems. European and Global Perspective. Budapest: CEU Press.
Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Fazio, R.H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In: M. P Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 75–109). New York: Academic Press.
Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross- National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42–66.
Habermas, J. (2008). Strukturalne przeobrażenia sfery publicznej. Warszawa: PWN.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The Participation Divide: Content Creation and Sharing in the Digital Age. Information, Communication and Society, 11(2), 239–56.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4).
Hargittai, E. (2008). The Role of Expertise in Navigating Links of Influence. In: J. Turow, & L. Tsui (Eds.), The Hyperlinked Society. (pp. 85–103). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lerner, D. (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: Free Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social prerequisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.
Maier, J., & Rittberger, B. (2008). Shifting Europe’s Boundaries: Mass Media, Public Opinion and the Enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics, 9(2), 243–67.
Matthes, J. & Schemer, C. (2012). Diachronic Framing Effects in Competitive Opinion Environments. Political Communication, 29(3), 319–39.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). Freedom without impartiality. The vicious circle of media capture. In: P. Gross, & K. Jakubowicz (Eds.), Media transformations in the post-communist world: Eastern Europe's Tortured Path to Change (pp. 33–47). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Pye, L. W. (1963). Communications and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Štětka, V. (2013). Media Ownership and Commercial Pressures – Pillar 1 Final report. https://mde.politics.ox.ac.uk/images/Final_reports/stetka_2013_final%20report_posted.pdf (10/01/2018).
Tourengau, R., Rips, L.J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.