Satisfaction from the Actions of the Local Governments

Research Report


Abstract

In the article two main issues are depicted: the evaluation of activities of voyts, mayors and also the evaluation of local government activities. In a research conducted from the end of 2018 until the beginning of 2019 we decided to verify 3 hypotheses. First one was: confidence towards the local government results from positive evaluations of voyts and mayors activities. The results were compared with the data from previous research. The second hypothesis assumes, that positive evaluation of local government activities is not connected to the activities of single executive body, but is connected to how the whole system of local government works. Third one, however, assumes that local government on the level of voivodeship is rated lower than city (commune) government. Relatively high level of satisfaction about the activities of voyts and mayors, that were recorded in 2012 research not only remained but even increased. This is the factor that strengthens confidence in local government and favors their positive evaluation. Also voivodeship governments are positively evaluated by the surveyed, however, the level of satisfaction is lower than those of other local authorities.


Keywords

2018 local government election; local government; executive bodies of local government

Alberski, R. (2013). Zadowolenie z działalności wójtów, burmistrzów oraz prezydentów miast oraz ocena poziomu reprezentacji interesów przez władze samorządowe. Political Preferences, 6, 33–46.

Bober, J. et al. (2013). Narastające dysfunkcje, zasadnicze dylematy, konieczne działania. Raport o stanie samorządności terytorialnej w Polsce, Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej, Fundacja Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej.

CBOS (60/2010). Postawy wobec demokracji, jej rozumienie i oceny. Komunikat z badań CBOS nr 60/2010. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.

CBOS (18/2016). Zaufanie społeczne. Komunikat z badań CBOS nr 18/2016. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.

CBOS (107/2017). Zasady demokracji i ich realizacja w Polsce. Komunikat z badań CBOS nr 107/2017. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.

CBOS (121/2018). Oceny działalności instytucji publicznych. Raport z badań CBOS nr 121/2018. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.

Lisiakiewicz, R. (2015). Decentralizacja władzy państwowej i stan funkcjonowania samorządu terytorialnego. In: J. Kornaś, & Ł. Danel (eds.). Polski system polityczny z perspektywy 25 lat: wybrane problemy. Toruń: Wyd. Adam Marszałek.

Tocqueville, A. de (1976). O demokracji w Ameryce. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.

Tomaszewska-Hołub, B. (2015). Nadzieje, oczekiwania, dyskusje – wybory samorządowe 1990-2014. In: D. Plecka, & Z. Osmólska (eds.), Administracja publiczna. Wybory samorządowe 2014 (pp. 16–26). Toruń: Wyd. Adam Marszałek.

Download

Published : 2020-01-28


AlberskiR. (2020). Satisfaction from the Actions of the Local Governments. Political Preferences, (25), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.31261/polpre.2019.25.37-52

Robert Paweł Alberski  robert.alberski@gmail.com
University of Wrocław, Poland  Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-2106




The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.