How Republicans and Democrats Strengthen Secret Surveillance in the United States
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to assess the relationship between secrecy and transparency in the pre- and post-Snowden eras in the United States. The Author analyzes, from both political and legal perspectives, the sources and outcomes of the U.S. politics of national security with a special focus on domestic and intelligence surveillance measures. The core argument of the paper is that, due to the role of the executive which has always promoted the culture of secrecy, there is no chance for the demanded transparency in national security surveillance, despite the controlling powers of the legislative and judiciary. As the analysis proves, the United States in the post-Snowden era seems to be the most transparent and secretive state, at the same time.
Keywords
politics of surveillance; secrecy; transparency; national security; separation of powers; United States; Snowden
References
Aftergood, S. (2010). National Security Secrecy: How the Limits Change. Social Research, 77(3), 839–52.
Agerholm, H. (2018). Poland Independence Day: Far-Right March Banned over Fears of Violence. 8th Nov. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/poland-far-right-warsaw-march-protest-independence-day-nationalism-fascism-a8623466.html (9/11/2018).
Akerman, B. (2006). Before the Next Attack: preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Alloa, E., & Thoma, D. (eds.) (2018). Transparency, Society, and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Angwin, J. (2014). Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentness Surveillance. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Arnold, J. R. (2014). Secrecy in the Sunshine Era. The Promise and Failures of US Open Government Laws. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Boersma, K., Van Brackel, R., Fonio, Ch., & Wagenaar, P. (eds.). (2014). Histories of State Surveillance in Europe and Beyond. New York: Routledge.
Brandeis, L. D. (1914). Other People’s Money and How the Bankers Use It. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.
Coby, P. (1999). Machiavelli’s Romans: Liberty and the Greatness in the Discourses of Livy. Lanham: Lexington Books.
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208.
Dudziak, M. L. (2000). Cold War Civil Rights: Race and Image of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Edelson, Ch. (2016). Power Without Constraint. The Post-9/11 Presidency and National Security. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Edgar, T. J. (2017). Beyond Snowden, Privacy, Mass Surveillance, and the Struggle to Reform the NSA. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Farber, D. (ed.). (2008). Security v. Liberty: Conflicts Between Civil Liberties and National Security in American History. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Farrand, M. (ed) (1966). Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. Vol. I. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fisher, L. (2013). Presidential War Power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2008). Full Disclosure. The Perils and Promise of Transparency. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garvey, T. (2014). Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice, and Recent Developments. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42670.pdf (9/11/2018).
Ginsberg, B. (2016). Presidential Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Glennon, M. J. (2015). National Security and Double Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldfarb, E. (ed.) (2015). After Snowden: Privacy, Secrecy, and Security in the Information Age. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
Graham, M. (2017). Presidents’ Secrets. The Use and Abuse of Hidden Power. Yale University Press: New Haven.
Green, N., & Zurawski, N. (2015). Surveillance and Ethnography: Researching Surveillance as Everyday Life. Surveillance & Society, 13(1), 27–43.
Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Keller, W. W. (2017). Democracy Betrayed. The Rise of the Surveillance Security State. Berkeley: Counterpoint.
Kitrosser, H. (2015). Reclaiming Accountability. Transparency, Executive Power, and the U.S. Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuntze, J.-H. (2018) The Abolishment of the Right to Privacy? The USA, Mass Surveillance and the Spiral Model. Baden-Baden: Tectum Verlag.
Laidler, P. (2011). Sad Najwyzszy Stanow Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Od prawa do polityki. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.
Lester, G. (2015). When Should State Secrets Stay Secret? Accountability, Democratic Governance, and Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.
Lyon, D (2015). Surveillance After Snowden. Cambridge: Polity.
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
Mania, A., & Laidler, P. (2004). Controversies over the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The Polish Quarterly of International Studies, 13(3), 52–64.
Masco, J. (2014). The Theatre of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mills, J. L. (2015). The Future of Privacy in the Surveillance Age. In: E. Goldfarb (ed.), After Snowden: Privacy, Secrecy, and Security in the Information Age (pp. 191–260). New York: Thomas Dunne Books..
Moynihan, D. P. (1997). The Culture of Secrecy. Public Interest, 128, 55–72.
Mutch, R. C. (2014). Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform. New York: Oxford University Press
Nelson, M. (2018). Trump: the First Two Years. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Northouse, C. (ed.) (2006). Protecting What Matters: Technolocy, Security, and Liberty Since 9/11. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Olmsted, K. (2018). Terror Tuesdays: How Obama Refined Bush’s Counterterrorism Policies. In: J. E. Zelizer (ed.), The Presidency of Barack Obama. A First Historical Assessment (pp. 212–26). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Parenti, Ch. (2003). The Soft Cage: Surveillance in America. From Slavery to the War on Terror. New York: Basic Books.
Posner, E. E., & Vermeule, A. (2006). Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty, and the Courts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Prados, J. (2014). The Family Jewels. The CIA, Secrecy, and Presidential Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Robertiello, G. (2017). The Use and Abuse of Police Power in America: Historical Milestones and Current Controversies. Santa Barbara-Denver: ABC-Clio.
Salokar, R. M. (1992). The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Sandford, A. (2018). Poland Court Overturns Warsaw Ban on Far-Right Independence March. 9th Nov., Euronews.com. https://www.euronews.com/2018/11/09/poland-court-overturns-warsaw-ban-on-far-right-independence-march (9/11/2018).
Siegel, B. (2015). Judging the State Secrets: Who Decides – and How?. In: E. Goldfarb (ed.), After Snowden: Privacy, Secrecy, and Security in the Information Age (pp. 141–190). New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
Smith, C. S., & Hung, Li-Ching. (2010). The Patriot Act: Issues and Controversies. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Solove, D. J. (2011). Nothing to Hide. The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Svenonius, O., & Bjoerklund, F. (2018). Explaining Attitudes to Secret Surveillance in Post-Communist Societies. East European Politics, 34(2), 123–51.
Theoharis, A. G. (2011). Abuse of Power: How Cold War Surveillance and Secrecy Policy Shaped the Response to 9/11. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Theoharis, A. G. (ed.) (1998). A Culture of Secrecy: The Government Versus the People’s Right to Know. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Theoharis, A. G. (1993). From the Secret Files of J. Edgar Hoover. New York: Ivan R. Dee.
Jagiellonian University, Poland Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1338-3285
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
