Terrorism and Right-Wing Extremism: History and Comparative Definitions
Abstract
Recent narratives on terrorism have focused on the definitions. Terrorism is not a new phenomenon, but the problem resides in its definition and who is defining it. Conceptualizing terrorism depends on which framework one utilizes. The use of different lenses to define the term has contributed to the lack of global acceptance of what constitutes terrorism, hence the difficulty of gathering data for analysis. It is also a conundrum when powerful nations legitimize their terrorist activities against weaker ones. This, unfortunately, has led to the subjectiveness of every attempt in the literature to objectively provide a globally acceptable definition. Using meta-analysis as the methodological approach for the study a number of definitions were scrutinised. This article provides a brief examination of the intersection between right-wing terrorism and ethnic nationalism, and how accelerationism escalates ideology into violence. The paper compares two acts of violence, one traditionally viewed as terrorism and the other labelled solely as a mass shooting. It concludes with a comparative analysis of the definitions provided, utilizing a case study to examine how labels of a terrorist or a freedom fighter impact on one’s view of a group’s motivation. This is pertinent when analysing ideologically motivated violence.
Keywords
terrorism; right-wing terrorism; ethnic nationalism; comparative analysis
References
Anderson, D. 2005. Histories of the hanged: The dirty war in Kenya and the end of empire. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Antwi-Boasiako, K. B. (2010). Defining international terrorism: Historical reality and the African experience. Journal of Comparative Politics, 3(2), 104–24.
Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research. 9th Ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson.
Bahan, C.A. (2009). International terrorism: The legitimization of safe harbor states in international law. New York Law School Law Review, 54, 333–68.
BBC News. (2019). Texas Walmart shooting: El Paso attack domestic terrorism. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49226573 (04/04/2020).
Bouhana, N., Corner, E., Gill, P,. & Schuurman, B. (2018). Background and preparatory behaviours of right-wing extremist lone actors: a comparative study. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(6), 150–63.
Bowles, N. (2019). ‘Replacement theory,’ a racist, sexist doctrine, spreads in far-right circles. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/technology/replacement-theory.html (27/03/2020).
Bruce, G. (2013). Definition of terrorism: Social and political effects. Journal of Military and Veterans Health, 21(2), 26–30.
Carr, C. (2007). Terrorism: Why the definition must be broad. World Policy Journal, 24(1), 47–50.
Cowell-Meyers, K. & Arthur, P. (2010). Irish Republican Army. In Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Irish-Republican-Army (20/05/2020).
Cronin, A. (2005). “Behind the curve: Globalization and international terrorism.” In: Readings in World Politics: A New Era. Edited by S. L. Spiegel, J. Morrions, F. L. Wehling & P. Williams (pp. 340–59). United States: Thomson and Wadsworth.
Dekmejian, H. R. (2007). Spectrum of terror. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Erlenbusch, V. (2015) Terrorism and revolutionary violence: The emergence of terrorism in the French Revolution. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8(2), 193–210.
Elkins, C. (2005). Imperial reckoning: The untold story of Britain’s gulag in Kenya. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Elliott, J. K. (2019). Why anti-apartheid hero Nelson Mandela was once labelled a terrorist. GlobalNews. https://globalnews.ca/news/5201623/nelson-mandela-apartheid-terrorist-south-africa/ (10/05/2020).
Fausto, B. (1999). A concise history of Brazil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, J. (2010). Political and philological origins of the term “terrorism” from the ancient near east to our times. Middle Eastern Studies, 46(2), 271–88.
Ganor, B. (2002). Defining terrorism: Is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter?. Police Practice and Research.3(4), 287–304.
Gerring, J. (2012). Social science methodology: a unified framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstone, J. A. (1984). Reinterpreting the French Revolution. Theory and Society, 13(5), 697–713.
GTI (2019). Global Terrorism Index 2019: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism. Sydney: Institute for Economics & Peace.
Gupta, D.K. (2011). Terrorism, history, and historians: A view from a social scientist. Journal of American History, 98(1), 95–100.
Haahr-Escolano, K. (2005). “Iran’s changing relationship with Hezbollah.” In Unmasking Terror: A Global Review of Terrorist Activities. Edited by Christopher Heffelfinger (pp. 69–72). Washington,DC: The Jamestown Foundation.
Heitmeyer, W. (2015). Right-wing terrorism. In: Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, reality and ways forward. Edited by T. Bjørgo (pp. 141–53). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
Holt, A. (2005). South Africa in the war on terror. In: Unmasking Terror: A Global Review of Terrorist Activities. Edited by Ch. Heffelfinger (pp. 92–96).Washington, DC: The Jamestown Foundation.
Hunter, S. T. (1991).Terrorism: A balance sheet. In: At Issues Politics in the World Arena (6th ed). Edited by S. L. Spiegel (pp. 350–65). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kaplan, J. (2011). History and terrorism. Journal of American History, 98(1), 101-105.
Kunzelman, M. (2020). Report: surge in white nationalism ramps up violence threat. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/report-surge-white-nationalism-ramps-violence-threat-69664607 (20/05/2020).
Matthews, E. G. (2002). E pluribus unum: Justice, liberty, and terror: An analysis of Western terrorism on people of African descent in the diaspora. Mason, OH: Thomson Custom Publishing.
Reinares, F. (2015). Nationalist separatism and terrorism in comparative perspective. In: Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, reality and ways forward. Edited by T. Bjørgo (pp. 119–30). Abingdon: Routledge.
Romero, S., Fernandez, M., & Padilla, M. (2019). Day at a shopping center in Texas turns deadly. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/03/us/el-paso-walmart-shooting.html (20/05/2020).
Ross, J., & Gurr, T. (2007). Why terrorism subsides: a comparative study of Canada and the United States. Comparative Politics, 21(4), 405–26.
Saul, B. (2005). Definition of ‘terrorism’ in the UN Security Council: 1985-2004. Chinese Journal of International Law, 4(1), 141–66.
Sawe, B. E. (2017). 10 Separatist Movements in Africa. WorldAtlas. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/10-separatist-movements-from-africa.html (02/04/2020).
Schmid, A. P., & Jongman, A. J. (2006). Political terrorism. London: Transactional Publishers.
Shughart II, W. F. (2006). An analytical history of terrorism, 1945–2000. Public.Choice, 1(28), 7–39.
Smith, M. (1971). Zealots and Sicarii: Their origins and relation. The Harvard Theological Review, 64(1), 1–19.
Sprinzak, E. (1995). Right-wing Terrorism in a Comparative Perspective: The Case of Split Delegitimization. In: Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, reality and ways forward. Edited by T. Bjørgo (pp. 17–43). Abingdon: Routledge.
Symonides, J. Z. (2001). International law and the struggle against terrorism. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 10(4), 22–39.
The Irish Times (2003). That dreadful year of 1972. The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/that-dreadful-year-of-1972-1.344116 (01/06/2020).
White, R. (1993). Provisional Irish Republicans: An oral and interpretive history. Westport, CO: Greenwood Press.
Young, R. (2006). Defining terrorism: The evolution of terrorism as a legal concept in international law and its influence on definitions in domestic legislation. BC International and Comparative Law Review, 23(1), 23–105.
Zeitlin, S. (1965). Masada and the Sicarii. The Jewish Quarterly Review, 55, 299–317.
Stephen F. Austin State University, United States United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-3634
Stephen F. Austin State University, United States United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-6737
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
