Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2000). Break Out the Mint Juleps? Is New Hampshire the "Primary" Culprit Limiting Presidential Nomination Forecasts?. American Politics Quarterly, 28(2), 251–269.
Google Scholar
Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2002). The Money Primary: What Influences the Outcome of Pre-Primary Presidential Nomination Fundraising?. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 256–275.
Google Scholar
Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2005). Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 646–660.
Google Scholar
Brams, S. J. (2008). The Presidential Election Game. Wellesley: A. K. Peters.
Google Scholar
Brown, C. W., Jr., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bycoffee, A. (2016). The Endorsement Primary. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/ (21/07/2017).
Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2016). Also-Rans: 2016 Presidential Race. https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/also-rans (23/08/2010).
Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2020a). Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups, 2010-2020. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/summ.php (23/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2020b). Expenditures Breakdown, Tom Steyer, 2020 cycle. https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/expenditures/tom-steyer?id=N00044966 (23.08.2020).
Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2020c). Expenditures Breakdown, Michel Bloomberg, 2020 cycle. https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/expenditures/michael-bloomberg?id=N00029349 (23/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Cohen, M., David, K., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2008). The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar
Confessore, N., & Yourish, K. (2016), $2Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump. The New York Times, 15.03.
Google Scholar
Damore, D.F. (1997). A Dynamic Model of Candidate Fundraising: The Case of Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 50(2), 343–364.
Google Scholar
Democratic Party of the United States (2019). Call for the 2020 Democratic National Convention. https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2020-Call-for-Convention-WITH-Attachments-2.26.19.pdf (21/08/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (1996). Presidential Receipts through Deember 31, 1995. https://www.fec.gov/resources/campaign-finance-statistics/1996/tables/presidential/Pres1_1995_12m.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2016a). Presidential Campaign Finance Summaries. https://www.fec.gov/campaign-finance-data/presidential-campaign-finance-summaries/ (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2016b). Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements May 31, 2016. https://transition.fec.gov/press/summaries/2016/tables/presidential/presdisbursements_2016_m6.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2016c). Donald Trump for President, Inc. Committee fillings, 2015-2016. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00580100/?tab=filings&cycle=2016 (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2016d). Priorities USA Action, Independent Expenditures, 2015-2016. https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00495861/?cycle=2016&tab=spending#independent-expenditures (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2019). Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Receipts Through June 30, 2019. https://transition.fec.gov/press/summaries/2020/tables/presidential/PresCand1_2019_6m.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2020a). Independent Expenditures Made For or Against 2020 Presidential Candidates Through March 31, 2020. https://transition.fec.gov/press/summaries/2020/tables/ie/IE2_2020_15m.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2020b). Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements Through March 31, 2020. https://transition.fec.gov/press/summaries/2020/tables/presidential/PresCand2_2020_15m.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2020c). Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements Through December 31, 2019. https://transition.fec.gov/press/summaries/2020/tables/presidential/PresCand2_2019_12m.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2020d). Tom Steyer 2020 Committee fillings, https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00711614/?tab=filings (23/08/2020).
Google Scholar
FEC (2020e). Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc. Committee fillings, https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00728154/?cycle=2020 (23/08/2020).
Google Scholar
FiveThirtyEight.com (2020). The 2020 Endorsement Primary. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-endorsements/democratic-primary/ (21/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Goff, M. J. (2004). The Money Primary: the New Politics of the Early Presidential Nomination Process. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Green J. C. (2019). Financing the 2008 Presidential Nomination Campaigns. In: D. G. Magleby, & A. Corrado (eds.), Financing the 2016 Election (pp. 131–186). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Green J. C., & Kingsbury D. (2011). Financing the 2008 Presidential Nomination Campaigns. In: D. G. Magleby, & A. Corrado (eds.), Financing the 2008 Election (pp. 86–126). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Hershey, M. R. (2017). The Media. Covering Donald Trump. In: M. Nelson (ed.), The Elections of 2016 (pp. 113– 135). Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. (2017). The Election. The Allure of the Outsider. In: M. Nelson (ed.), The Elections of 2016 (pp. 63–86). Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Hinckley, K. A., & Green, J. C. (1996). Fund-Raising in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: The Primary Lessons of 1988. Political Research Quarterly, 49(4), 693–718.
Google Scholar
Laidler, P., & Turek, M. (2016). Cena demokracji. Finansowanie federalnych kampanii wyborczych w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar
Malbin, M. J, & Glavin, B. (2018). CFI's Guide to Money in Federal Elections. 2016 in Historical Context. http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/federal/2016Report/CFIGuide_MoneyinFederalElections.pdf (15/06/2020).
Google Scholar
Mayer, W. G. (1996). Forecasting Presidential Nominations. In: W. G. Mayer (ed). In Pursuit of the White House. How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees (pp. 44–71). Chatham: Chatham House Publishers Inc.
Google Scholar
Mayer, W. G. (2003). Forecasting Presidential Nomination, or My Model Worked Just Fine, Thank You. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 153–157.
Google Scholar
Mayer, W. G. (2009). Superdelegates: Reforming the Reforms Revisited. In: S. S. Smith, & M. J. Springer (eds.). Reforming the Presidential Nomination Process (pp. 85-108). Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Mayer, W. G. (2017). The Nominations. The Road to a Much-Disliked General Election. In: M. Nelson (ed.), The Elections of 2016 (pp. 29–62). Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Morin, R. (2019). Bloomberg: Independent presidential bid would ‘end up re-electing Trump’. Politico.com. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/28/bloomberg-2020-elections-howard-schultz-1129214 (23/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Patterson, T. E. (2016a). News Coverage of the 2016 Presidential Primaries: Horse Race Reporting Has Consequences. https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Election-2016-Primary-Media-Coverage.pdf (20/05/2017).
Google Scholar
Patterson, T. E. (2016b). Pre-Primary News Coverage of the 2016 Presidential Race: Trump's Rise, Sanders Emergence, Clinton's Struggle, https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Pre-Primary-News-Coverage-Trump-Sanders-Clinton-2016.pdf (20/05/2017).
Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2016). The Parties on the Eve of the 2016 Election: Two Coalitions, Moving Further Apart, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/09/13/the-parties-on-the-eve-of-the-2016-election-two-coalitions-moving-further-apart/ (20/08/2020).
Google Scholar
RealClearPolitics.com (2016). 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination Polls, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html (17/08/2020).
Google Scholar
RealClearPolitics.com (2020). 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination Polls, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html (17/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Tolbert, C. J., & Donovan, T. (2011). Why Iowa? How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Seitz-Weld, A. (2019). Bernie Sanders sings DNC loyalty pledge: 'I am a member of the Democratic Party, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/bernie-sanders-signs-dnc-loyalty-pledge-i-am-member-democratic-n979696 (25/08/2020).
Google Scholar
Steger, W. P. (2000). Do Primary Voters Draw from a Stacked Deck? Presidential Nominations in an Era of Candidate-Centered Campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 727–753.
Google Scholar
Steger, W. P. (2007). Who Wins Nomination and Why? An Updated Forecast of the Presidential Primary Vote. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1), 91–99.
Google Scholar
Steger, W. P. (2008). Forecasting the Presidential Primary Vote: Viability, Ideology and Momentum. International Journal of Forecasting, 24(2): 193–208.
Google Scholar
Stevens, S. (2020). It Was All a Lie. How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump, New York: Arthur A. Knopf.
Google Scholar
The Institute of Politics (2009) Campaign for President. The Managers Look at 2008, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2013). Amerykański system finansowania wyborów i jego konsekwencje. In: P. Napierała, & A. Małek (eds.), Stany Zjednoczone wczoraj i dziś. Wybrane zagadnienia społeczno-polityczne (pp. 167–199). Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2016). Krótka historia SuperPACs. In: P. Napierała,& R. Kuś (eds.), Oblicza Ameryki. Szkice o społeczeństwie, kulturze i polityce Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki (pp. 177-194). Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2017). Prawybory prezydenckie w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Bilans czterech dekad, 1976-2016. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.
Google Scholar
Turek, M. (2018). Feel the Bern: prezydencka kandydatura Bernie'go Sandersa i jej dziedzictwo. In: Ł. Niewiński, (ed.), Czas wojny, czas pokoju. Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki od niepodległości do współczesności (pp. 86-103). Oświęcim: Napoleon V.
Google Scholar
Weprin, A. (2016). CBS CEO Les Moonves clarifies Donald Trump 'good for CBS' comment. Politico.com. https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cbs-ceo-les-moonves-clarifies-donald-trump-good-for-cbs-comment-229996 (20/07/2017).
Google Scholar
Witcover, J. (1997). No Way to Pick a President. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Google Scholar