The Many Forms and Meanings of (Peace) Walls in Contemporary Northern Ireland


Laura McAtackney
Arhuus University

The Many Forms and Meanings of (Peace) Walls
in Contemporary Northern Ireland

Abstract: Peace walls are a longstanding materialization of the conflict in Northern Ireland, known as the Troubles c.1968-c.1998. The walls have been one of the only security infrastructural forms associated with the violence to have continued and grown into the post-conflict context. They have often been a forgotten materialization of conflict due to their ‘temporary’ nature and their restriction to working-class, urban areas. While there are increasing moves to have these walls removed, or at least to put policies in place to allow them to be taken down in consultation with the communities beside them, there has been little consideration of the long-term impacts on public memory of material segregation. This article uses peace walls in Belfast as a case-study of the unforeseen repercussions of long-term segregation of divided communities. It offers a warning to the current generation of politicians regarding not only the role of what ideological walls are intended to do, but also the impacts they can have that were not intended. 

Keywords: Belfast, segregation, peace walls, memorials, gender, victimhood


Belfast; segregation; peace walls; memorials; gender; victimhood

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, 2006.

Baker, Frederick. 1993. “The Berlin Wall: Production, preservation and consumption of a twentieth century monument.” Antiquity, vol. 67, 1993, pp. 709–33.

“Donald Trump’s Mexico Wall: Who is Going to Pay for It?” BBC, 6 February 2017.

Belfast Agreement. The Belfast Agreement. HMSO, 1998.

Blakeley, Edward J. and Mary Gail Snyder. “Divided We Fall: Gated and Walled Communities in the United States.” Architecture of Fear, edited by Nan Ellin, Princeton Architectural Press, 1995, 85–101.

Community Relations Council. Towards Sustainable Security: Interface Barriers and the Legacy of Segregation in Belfast. Community Relations Council, c. 2009.

Dey, Hendrik W. The Aurelian Wall and the Refashioning of Imperial Rome, AD 271-855. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Dinzey-Flores, Zaire. Locked In, Locked Out: Gated Communities in a Puerto Rican City. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.

Doss, Erika. Memorial Mania: public feeling in America. University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Douglas, Neville. “Political structures, social interaction and identity change in Northern Ireland”. In B. Graham (ed.). In Search of Ireland: a cultural geography, edited by Brian J. Graham, Routledge, 1998, 151–74.

Edwards, Aaron. and Cillian McGrattan. The Northern Ireland Conflict. Oneworld Publications, 2010.

Jarman, Neil and Chris O’Halloran. “Recreational Rioting: Young People, Interface Areas and Violence.” Childcare in Practice, vol. 7, no. 1, 2001, pp. 2–16.

Leonard, Madeleine. “Teens and Territory in Contested Spaces: Negotiating Sectarian Interfaces in Northern Ireland.” Children’s Geographies, vol. 4, no. 2, 2006, pp. 225–38.

Low, Setha. Behind the Gates: Security and the New American Dream. Routledge, 2004.

Marcuse, Peter. 1994. “Walls as metaphors and reality.” Managing Divided Cities, edited by Seamus Dunn, Keele University Press, 1994, 41–52.

McAtackney, Laura. and McGuire, Randy. (eds). A World of Walls. University of New Mexico Press, 2018.

McAtackney, Laura. “Repercussions of Differential Deindustrialization in the City: Memory and Identity in Contemporary East Belfast.” In L. McAtackney & K. Ryzewski (eds). Contemporary Archaeology and the City: Creativity, Ruination and Political Action, edited by Laura McAtackney and Krysta Ryzewski, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 190-211.

McAtackney, Laura. “Peace Maintenance and Political Messages: The Significance of Walls During and After the ‘Troubles’ in Northern Ireland.” Journal of Social Archaeology vol 11, no. 1, 2011, pp. 77-98.

McDowell, Sara. “Commemorating Dead ‘Men’: Gendering the Past and Present in Post-Conflict Northern Ireland.” Gender, Place and Culture, vol. 15, no. 4, 2008, pp. 335-354.

--- “Selling Conflict Heritage through Tourism in Peacetime Northern Ireland: Transforming Conflict or Exacerbating Difference?” International Journal of Heritage Studies, Vol. 14, no. 5, 2008, pp. 405-21.

McGrattan, Cillian. “Order Out of Chaos: The Politics of Transitional Justice.” Politics vol. 29, no.3, 2009, pp. 164—172.

McWilliams, Anna. An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain: Material and Metaphor. Södertörns högskola, 2013.

Mieder, Wolfgang. “‘Good Fences Make Good Neighbours’: History and Significance of an Ambiguous Proverb.” Folklore vol. 114, no. 2, 2003, pp. 155-179.

Mulholland, Marc. The Longest War: Northern Ireland’s Troubled History. Oxford University Press, 2001.

Rice-Oxley, Mark. “Why Are We Building New Walls to Divide Us?” The Guardian, 19 November 2013.

Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2006. “Towards a Problematisation of the Problematisations that Reduce Northern Ireland to a ‘Problem.’” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 9, no.4, 2006, pp. 513–26.

Whyte, John. Interpreting Northern Ireland. Oxford University Press, 1991.

Published : 2018-06-30

McAtackneyL. (2018). The Many Forms and Meanings of (Peace) Walls in Contemporary Northern Ireland. Review of International American Studies, 11(1). Retrieved from

Laura McAtackney
Department of Archaeology and Heritage Arhuus University Denmark  Denmark

Laura McAtackney is an Associate Professor in the Department of Archaeology and Heritage at Arhuus University in Denmark. She is an archaeologist by training and has worked on various materializations of conflict in Ireland, South Africa, and the Caribbean, including two long-term studies of historic political prisons. 

The Copyright Holder of the submitted text is the Author. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the RIAS websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in RIAS.

  1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license ( Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.

  1. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution - By the same conditions 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

  1. User Rights

Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

  1. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.