Humanae Vitae, Women’s Rights, and Responsible Parenthood
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the arguments present in Humanae Vitae which found positive resonance in the writings of women adopting the papal teaching on the nature of human sexuality and sexual ethics. According to some women, in particular the new feminists, the logic of the papal teaching concerning contraception contributes to promoting the dignity and rights of women as well as responsible parenthood. In their view, contraception does not contribute to women’s rights. Instead, it rather exacerbates the imbalance between men and women as well as sanctions the man’s irresponsible and hedonistic attitude towards a woman. Using contraception is in a deep sense anti-ecological. It is both disrespectful of the nature of woman’s fertility and destructive of relations within the family. The responsible parenthood defined by the papal teaching and by his commentators (both men and women quoted in the article) means taking responsibility for one’s sexual acts and their possible effects. The analyzed authors claim that by defending the nature of love, the nature of human beings, and the nature of the objective moral order, the encyclical Humanae Vitae defends women by defending their nature against the arbitrariness of men or society.
Keywords
Humanae Vitae; women’s rights; new feminism; responsible parenthood
References
Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret. “Contraception and Chastity.” In Why Humanae Vitae Was Right: A Reader, edited by Janet E. Smith, 119–146. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993.
Bajda, Jerzy, Karol Meissner OSB, Stanisław Podgórski CSSR, Stanisław Smoleński, Tadeusz Ślipko TJ, and Juliusz Turowicz. Memoriał krakowski. Uzasadnienie katolickiej nauki tyczącej podstaw moralnych życia małżeńskiego oraz Wprowadzenie do encykliki Humanae Vitae. 2nd ed. Poznań: BONAMI, 2012.
Bajda, Jerzy. ”Zagadnienie równości mężczyzny i kobiety w dziedzinie małżeństwa.” In Jerzy Bajda, Karol Meissner OSB, Stanisław Podgórski CSSR, Stanisław Smoleński, Tadeusz Ślipko TJ, and Juliusz Turowicz. Memoriał krakowski. Uzasadnienie katolickiej nauki tyczącej podstaw moralnych życia małżeńskiego oraz Wprowadzenie do encykliki Humanae Vitae. 2nd ed., 27–29. Poznań: BONAMI, 2012.
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. “Retrieving the Tradition. A Word on Humanae Vitae.” Communio: International Catholic Review 20 (Summer 1993): 437–450.
Finnis, John. “Personal Integrity, Sexual Morality and Responsible Parenthood.” In Why Humanae Vitae Was Right: A Reader, edited by Janet E. Smith, 171–191. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993.
Glendon, Mary Ann. “Feminism and the Family.” Commonweal, vol. 124(3) (1997): 11–15.
Glendon, Mary Ann. “Women’s Identity, Women’s Rights and the Civilization of Life.” In Evangelium Vitae and Law, 63–75. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997.
Gormally, Luke. “Marriage and the Prophylactic Use of Condoms.” The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (4) (Winter 2005): 735–749.
Matlary, Janne Haaland. Nowy feminizm. Kobieta i świat wartości. Translated by Małgorzata Ratajczak. Poznań: „W drodze,” 2000.
John Paul II. Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, 1995. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html.
John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them. A Theology of the Body. Translated by Michael Waldstein. Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 2006.
Marcinkowska, Katarzyna, and Mariusz Marcinkowski. NPR jest O.K.! Nowy styl życia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Rubikon, 2012.
Paul VI. Encyclical Humanae Vitae. 1968. https://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html.
Schumacher, Michele M. “Human Ecology and the Prophetic Value of Humanae Vitae.” Nova et Vetera, English Edition, vol. 16 (4) (2018): 1227–1260.
Shivanandan, Mary. Crossing the Threshold of Love. A New Vision of Marriage in the Light of John Paul II’s Anthropology. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1999.
Smith, Janet E. “Paul VI as Prophet.” In Why Humanae Vitae Was Right: A Reader, edited by Janet E. Smith, 519–531. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993.
Turowicz, Juliusz, and Stanisław Smoleński. “Miłość małżeńska i dobro rodziny.” In Memoriał krakowski. Uzasadnienie katolickiej nauki tyczącej podstaw moralnych życia małżeńskiego oraz Wprowadzenie do encykliki Humanae Vitae. 2nd ed., edited by Jerzy Bajda, Karol Meissner OSB, Stanisław Podgórski CSSR, Stanisław Smoleński, Tadeusz Ślipko TJ, and Juliusz Turowicz, 25–27. Poznań: BONAMI, 2012.
Wojtyła, Karol. Love and Responsibility. Translated by H. T. Willetts. London: William Collins Sons & Co., 1981.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
