Karol Wojtyla’s Conception of Personhood from the Perspective of Cognitive Sciences
Abstract
We use the term “person” when we want to point out that human existence is unrepeatable and unique. The assumption that man is a person constitutes a basis for the belief in the dignity, efficacy, and responsibility of the human individual. Karol Wojtyla built his conception of the person in the context of theological and philosophical discussions. Even though Wojtyła’s conception has been given a great deal of scholarly attention, it is worthwhile to juxtapose it with contemporary anthropological theories that derive from cognitive sciences. Cognitivists usually base their theories on biological and sociological premises. Some conclusions arrived at in the area of the cognitive sciences lead to mind-brain reductionism, a theory in which the human being is regarded as a body endowed with the function of the brain and as an entity whose individual traits are shaped by its social and cultural environment. This position undermines the ideas of free will and the substantial singularity of the human person. However, debates with this position have worked out a non-reductionist alternative, a theory known as emergentism. This theory treats the human mind as a distinct faculty, one which emerges as a phase in the brain’s development. Emergentists base their reasoning on the assumptions that the body is a unity and that the mind is not identical with it. It is my belief that emergentism can be fruitfully applied to the dynamic understanding of the person put forward by Wojtyła in the middle of the 20th century.
Keywords
Karol Wojtyla; person; human nature; free will; cognitive sciences
References
Basic Writings of Thomas Aquinas, edited by Anton C. Pegis, vol. 2: Man and the Conduct of Life. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997.
Boethius, Ancius M. S. Theological Trectates and the Consolution of Philosophy. Translated by Hugh. F. Steward Eedward K. Rand and Jim Tester. Oxford: The Project Gutenberg, 2004.
Bremer, Józef. Osoba – fikcja czy rzeczywistość. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM, 2008.
Bremer, Józef. Neoronaukowcy i potoczny obraz osoby w kognitywistyce. Kraków Wydawnictwo WAM, 2016.
Bremer, Józef. Problem osoby w świetle neuronauk. Czy osoba to jedynie użyteczna metafora? STD 2018, nr 4, 11–27. https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/handle/11320/7803.
Boler, John. “Transcending the Natural: Duns Scotus on the Two Affections of the Will.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly no. 67 (1993), 109–126.
Chalmers, David J., The Conscious Mind: In Search of Fundamental Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
D’Andradde, Roy. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambidge University Press, 1995.
Dennett, Daniel C. Consciousness Exlplained. London: Penguin Books Ltd., 1993.
Duch, Włodzisław. Czy jesteśmy automatami? Mózgi, wolna wola i odpowiedzialność. In Na ścieżkach neuronauki, edited by Piotr Franzuz, 219–264. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2010.
Gazzaniga, Michael. The Law and Neuroscience Project. https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/law_and_neuroscience_0408.pdf.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphsics of Morals: A German-English Edition, edited and translated by Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Roger Woolhouse. London Publishing Books Ltd., 1997.
Nagel, Thomas. “The Limits Objectivity.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Pala, Amadeusz. Struktura dynamizmu człowieka-osoby w antropologii adekwatnej Karola Wojtyły. Logos i Ethos nr 1 (47) (2018): 131–151.
Parfit, Darek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Popper, Karl, and Eccles John. The Self and Its Brain. An Argument for Interactionism, 355–376. London and New York: Routledge, 1977.
Reforging the Great Chain of Being, Studies of the History of Modal Theories. Edited by Simo Knuuttila. Synthese Historical Library 20. Dordrechet: Springer Netherlands 1981.
Shihiu, Han, Georg Northoff, Kai Vogeley, E. Bruce Wexler, Shinobu Kitayama, and Michael E. W. Varnum. A Cultural Neuroscience Approach to the Biosocial Nature of the Humane Brain. Annual Review of Psychology vol. 64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629.
Strawson, Peter S. Individuals. An Essay in Desciriptive Mataphisics. London:, Methuen & Co., Ltd.. 1959.
Sperry, Roger. “A Modified Concept of Consciousness.” Psychological Review, vol. 76, no. 6 (1969): 532–536.
Swinburne, Richard. The Evolution of the Soul. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.
Taylor, Jameson. “Beyond Nature: Karol Wojtyla’s Development of the Traditional Definition of Personhood.” The Review of Metaphisics, vol. 63, no. 2 (2009): 415–454.
Wojtyła, Karol. “Ocena możliwości zbudowania etyki chrześcijańskiej przy założeniach systemu Maksa Schelera.” In Człowiek i moralność II: Zagadnienie podmiotu moralności, edited by Tadeusz Styczeń, Jerzy W. Gałkowski, Adam Rodziński, and Andrzej Szostek. Lublin: TN KUL.
Wojtyła, Karol. The Acting Person, edited by Anna T. Tymieniecka. Translated from Polish by Andrzej Potocki. Analecta Husserliana, vol. X. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1979.
Wojtyła, Karol. “The Transcendence of the Person in Action and Man’s Self-Teleology.” Analecta Husserlina, vol. IX: The Teleologies in Husserlian Phenomenology, edited by Anna T. Tymieniecka, 203–212. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Żegleń, Urszula. „Znaczenie filozofii dla kognitywistyki.” In Przewodnik po kognitywistyce, edited by Józef Bremer, 39–78. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM, 2016.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
