“Person” in CIC and CCEO Matrimonial Law. On the Idea of Vetera et Nova Harmonization in the Church Doctrine and Jurisprudence

Andrzej Pastwa

doi:10.31261/PaCL.2021.07.2.05

Published: 2021-12-31

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021)

“Person” in CIC and CCEO Matrimonial Law. On the Idea of Vetera et Nova Harmonization in the Church Doctrine and Jurisprudence

Andrzej Pastwa

Section: Part One: Canon Law

https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2021.07.2.05

Abstract

serious confrontation with the subject: “Person” in the Code of Matrimonial Law (CIC and CCEO), is an—invariably relevant—challenge that the study of canon law and jurisprudence have to face. The argument for the validity of this conclusion is provided by the famous John Paul II’s thesis, proclaimed in the Familiaris Consortio exhortation (1981) and the famous 1997 Address to the Roman Rota, which can be summarized in the following words: the foundation and structural principle of interpersonal (ethical and legal!) relationships in marriage is matrimonial love. This axiom—still insufficiently present in the thoughts of canonists and church judges—reflects the deepest truth, of which “prophetically” the author of the monumental works Love and Responsibility and The Acting Person gave testimony; the truth that not elsewhere, but in the conciliar spiritually person-centric vision of matrimonial community (communio/consortium), a hermeneutic key should be sought for an adequate and complete understanding of the structure of marriage, harmoniously integrating its two personal and institutional dimensions.
Karol Wojtyła’s/John Paul II’s brilliant thought deserved to be confronted with the premises that prove the hypothesis that the mere declarative identification in the expressed judgments/concepts with the idea of a personalistic aggiornamento (“programmed” especially in numbers 47–52 of the Council’s Constitution Gaudium et Spes) does not yet guarantee the adequacy and completeness of the canonistic approaches to the “truth of matrimony.” This is both in the sphere of theological exposure in accordance with the Magisterium (in the light of the “Image of God”) and at the praxis level: the interpretation and application of the normative records in the nodal canons of CIC and CCEO. The first part of the study is dedicated to illustrating such a state of affairs – in various proposals of doctrine and jurisprudence: from a concept that is completely misguided and destined to fail in advance; through a concept that, because of its extremely conservative approach to the need for vetera et nova harmonisation, has not stood the test of time, to concepts, indeed, universally acknowledged in the study of canon law, whose authors (or their adherents), after all, should be suggested to implement certain necessary corrections: bigger or smaller. In the second part, the research contemplation focuses on the conclusions of the realization of the conciliar postulate of “harmonization” in presenting a person-centric vision of matrimony. These synthetic remarks constitute an attempt to show the basis for an adequate interpretation of the formula adopted by the two codes announced in the title: “a partnership of the whole of life”.

Keywords:

person , Karola Wojtyła’s/ John Paul II’s personalism , legal anthropology of matrimony , the Code Matrimonial Law (CIC and CCEO) , personalistic concepts of canonical matrimony , the conciliar postulate of “harmonization”

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Pastwa, A. (2021). “Person” in CIC and CCEO Matrimonial Law. On the Idea of Vetera et Nova Harmonization in the Church Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Philosophy and Canon Law, 7(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2021.07.2.05

Cited by / Share

References

Bartnik, Czesław St. Personalizm, 284–286. Lublin: Oficyna Wydawnicza “Czas,” 1995.
Google Scholar

Baumann, Urs. Die Ehe – ein Sakrament? Zürich: Benziger, 1988.
Google Scholar

Benedict XVI. “Address on the Occasion of the Inauguration of the Judicial Year of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 22, 2011). http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2011/january/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20110122_rota-romana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

Benedict XVI. “Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 27, 2007). http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2007/january/documents/hf_benxvi_spe_20070127_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

Bernhard, Jean. “A propos de l’hypothèse concernant la notion de consommation existentielle du mariage.” Revue de Droit Canonique 20 (1970): 184–192.
Google Scholar

Bernhard, Jean. “Perspectives renouvelées sur l’hypothèse de la «consummation existentielle et dans la foi» du mariage chrétien.” Revue de Droit Canonique, vol. 24 (1974): 334–349.
Google Scholar

Bernhard, Jean. “Réinterprétation (existentielle et dans la foi) de la législation canonique concernant l’indissolubilité chrétien.” Revue de Droit Canonique, vol. 21 (1971): 243–278.
Google Scholar

Bertolini, Giacomo. “Il matrimonio come istituzione: un vincolo di giustizia in quanto verità dell’amore.” Anthropotes, vol. 31 (2015): 213–252.
Google Scholar

Beykirch, Ursula. Von der konfessionsverschiedenen zur konfessionsverbindenden Ehe?: Eine kirchenrechtliche Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der gesetzlichen Bestimmungen [Forschungen zur Kirchenrechtswissenschaft, Bd. 2] (Würzburg: Echter, 1987).
Google Scholar

Bonnet, Piero Antonio. “Essenza, proprietà essenziali, fini e sacramentalità (cann. 1055—1056).” In Diritto matrimoniale canonico, vol. 1, edited by Piero Antonio Bonnet and Carlo Gullo, 95–154. [Studi Giuridici, vol. 56].Città del Vaticano: LEV, 2002.
Google Scholar

Botero, Silvio. Divorciados vueltos a casar: un problema humano, una tradición eclesial, una perspectiva de futuro. Bogotà: Editorial San Pablo, 2002.
Google Scholar

Burke, Cormac. “Challenges to Matrimonial Jurisprudence Posed by the 1983 Code.” The Jurist, vol. 41 (2007): 441–452.
Google Scholar

Burke, Cormac. “I fini del matrimonio: visione istituzionale o personalistica?” Annales theologici vol. 6 (1992): 227–254.
Google Scholar

Burke, Cormac. L’oggetto del consenso matrimoniale. Un’analisi personalistica. Torino: Giappichelli, 1997.
Google Scholar

De Luca, Luigi. “La Chiesa e la società coniugale.” Il diritto ecclesiastico, vol. 81 (1970), no. 1, 257–277.
Google Scholar

Cantelmi, Tonino, Martina Aiello. “Il modo di essere e farsi persona-uomo e persona-donna nella relazione interpersonale.” In La centralità della persona nella giurisprudenza coram Serrano, vol. 3, edited by Maria C. Bresciani, [Studi Giuridici, vol. 86], (Città del Vaticano: LEV, 2009), 7–22.
Google Scholar

Carreras, Juan. “L’antropologia e le norme di capacità per celebrare il matrimonio (I precedenti remoti del canone 1095 CIC ’83).” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 4 (1992): 79–150.
Google Scholar

Carreras, Juan. “Commento al discorso di Giovanni Paolo II al Tribunale della Rota Romana in occasione dell’apertura dell’anno giudiziario.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 9 (1997): 774–782.
Google Scholar

Carreras, Joan. “La dimensione giuridica del matrimonio e della famiglia.” In Il concetto di diritto canonico. Storia e prospettive, edited by Carlos J. Errázuriz, Luis Navarro, 191–205. Milano: Giuffrè, 2000.
Google Scholar

Code of Canon Law (promulgated: May 27, 1917).
Google Scholar

Code of Canon Law (promulgated: January 25, 1983).
Google Scholar

Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (promulgated: October 18, 1990).
Google Scholar

Corecco, Eugenio. “Il matrimonio nel nuovo Codex Iuris Canonici. Osservazioni critiche.” In Studi sulle fonti del diritto matrimoniale canonico, 105–130. Padova: Cedam, 1988.
Google Scholar

Curran, Michael J. Conjugal Consummation in the Catholic Church. A Problem for Human and Theological Sciences. Roma: Pontificia Università Lateranense, 1988.
Google Scholar

Doherty, Denis J. Divorce and Remarriage. Resolving a Catholic Dilemma. St. Meinrad, IN: Abbey Press, 1974.
Google Scholar

Errázuriz, Carlos Juan. “La capacità matrimoniale vista alla luce dell’essenza del matrimonio.” Ius Ecclesae, vol. 14 (2002): 623–638.
Google Scholar

Errázuriz, Carlos Juan. Il diritto e la giustizia nella Chiesa. Verso una Teoria Fondamentale del diritto canonico. Milano: Giuffrè, 2000.
Google Scholar

Francis. Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia (March 19, 2016).
Google Scholar

Fumagalii Carulli, Ombretta. “Armonizzazione conciliare e tutela della persona nel nuovo codice di diritto canonico.” Il diritto ecclesiastico, vol. 98, no. 2 (1987), 500–511.
Google Scholar

Fumagalli Carulli, Ombretta. “Il Concilio Vaticano II e il matrimonio canonico: capacità e consenso nella convergenza tra pastorale e diritto.” Jus, vol. 60, no. 2 (2013): 211–229.
Google Scholar

Fumagalli Carulli, Ombetta. Il governo universale della Chiesa e i diritti della persona. Con cinque Lezioni magisteriali di: Giovanni Battista Re, Crescenzio Sepe, Mario Francesco Pompedda, Jean-Louis Tauran, Julián Herranz. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 2008.
Google Scholar

Fumagalii Carulli, Ombretta. Il matrimonio canonico tra principi astratti e casi pratici con cinque sentenze rotali commentate a cura di Anna Sammassimo. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 2008.
Google Scholar

Gerhartz, Günter. “La indisolubilidad del matrimonio y su disolución por la Iglesia en la problemática actual.” In Matrimonio y divorcio, edited by René Metz and Jean Schick, 207–243. Salamanca: Sigueme, 1974
Google Scholar

Góralski, Wojciech. “Przedmiot kanonicznej zgody małżeńskiej.” Śląskie Studia Historyczno-Teologiczne, vol. 34 (2001): 173–183.
Google Scholar

Góralski, Wojciech, and Andrzej Pastwa. Rodzina suwerenna – Kościół domowy. W nurcie współczesnej myśli prawnej Kościoła powszechnego i Kościoła w Polsce. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2015.
Google Scholar

Guindon, André. “Case for a ‘consummated’ sexual bond before a ‘ratified’ marriage.” Eglise et Théologie, vol. 8 (1977): 137–182.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. Diálogos sobre el amor y el natrimonio. Pamplona: EUNSA, 19873.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. Introduzione critica al diritto naturale. Milano: Giuffrè, 1990.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. “Libertad, naturaleza y compromiso en la sexualidad humana.” Persona y Derecho, vol. 19 (1988): 106–109.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. “Il matrimonio /cc. 1055–1062/.” In Codice di Diritto Canonico. Edizione bilinque commentata, vol. 2, edited by Pedro Lombardía and Juan Ignacio Arrieta, 749–753. Roma: Logos, 1987.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. “Obligaciones esenciales del matrimonio.” Ius canonicum, vol. 31 (1991): 59–83.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. Qué es el derecho? La moderna respuesta del realismo jurídico. Pamplona: EUNSA, 20082.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. Studi sull’essenza del matrimonio. Milano: Giuffrè, 2000.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier. Vetera et Nova. Cuestiones de Derecho Canónico y afines (1958–1991). Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Navarra, 1991.
Google Scholar

Hervada, Javier, and Pedro Lombardía. El Derecho del Pueblo de Dios. Hacia un sistema de Derecho canónico, vol. 3/1: Derecho Matrimonial. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, 1973.
Google Scholar

Hudson, J. Edward. “Marital consummation according to ecclesiastical legislation.” Studia canonica, vol. 12 (1978): 93–123.
Google Scholar

International Theological Commission. “Propositions on the Doctrine of Christian Marriage” (1977). http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1977_sacramento-matrimonio_en.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota for the Inauguration of the Judicial Year” (January 29, 2004). http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2004/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040129_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 29, 2005). http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2005/january/documents/hf_ jp-ii_spe_20050129_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Prelate Auditors, Officials and Advocates of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota (January 18, 1990). http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/it/speeches/1990/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19900118_rota-romana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Prelate Auditors, Officials and Advocates of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (February 1, 2001). http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2001/february/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20010201_rota-romana.htm. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Prelate Auditors, Officials and Advocates of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 28, 2002), http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2002/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20020128_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 27, 1997). http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/1997/january/documents/hf_ jp-ii_spe_19970127_rotaromana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. “Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 21, 2000). http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2000/jan-mar/documents/hf_ jp-ii_spe_20000121_rota-romana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Google Scholar

John Paul II. Apostolic Exhortation Christifideles Laici (December 30, 1988).
Google Scholar

John Paul II. Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio (November 22, 1981).
Google Scholar

John Paul II. Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor (August 6, 1993).
Google Scholar

John Paul II. Letter to Families Gratissimam Sane (February 2, 1994).
Google Scholar

Kowal, Janusz. “L’indissolubilità del matrimonio rato e consumato. Status quaestionis.” Periodica de re canonica, vol. 90 (2001): 273–304.
Google Scholar

Kupczak, Jaroslaw. Gift and Communion: John Paul II’s Theology of the Body. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.
Google Scholar

Lahidalga, Aguirre, and José María de. “La indisolubilidad absoluta del matrimonio y el matrimonio en la Iglesia hoy: estado de la question.” Lumen, vol. 20 (1971): 289–330.
Google Scholar

Lüdecke, Norbert. “Der Ausschluss des bonum coniugum. Ein Ehenichtigkeitsgrund mit Startschwierigkeiten.” De processibus matrimonialibus, vol. 2 (1995): 117–192.
Google Scholar

Lüdecke, Norbert. Eheschließung als Bund. Genese und Exegese der Ehelehre der Konzilskonstituzion “Gaudium et spes” in kanonistischer Auswertung [Forschungen zur Kirchenrechtswissenschaft, Bd. 7]. Würzburg: Echter, 1989.
Google Scholar

Lüdicke, Klaus. “Matrimonial Consent in Light of a Personalist Concept of Marriage: On the Council’s New Way of Thinking about Marriage.” Studia Canonica, vol. 33 (1999): 489–492.
Google Scholar

Lüdicke, Klaus. Die Nichtigerklärung der Ehe. Materielles Recht [Beihefte zum Münsterischen Kommentar, Bd. 62]. Essen: Ludgerus Verlag, 2012.
Google Scholar

Lüdicke, Klaus. “Rez. Burke, Cormac, L’oggetto del consenso matrimoniale….” De processibus matrimonialibus, vol. 6 (1999): 264–270.
Google Scholar

Mackin, Theodore. The Marital Sacrament. Mahwah, NY: Paulist Press, 1989.
Google Scholar

“Mężczyzną i niewiastą stworzył ich”. Afirmacja osoby ludzkiej odpowiedzią nauk teologicznych na ideologiczną uzurpację genderyzmu, edited by Andrzej Pastwa [Studia Teologiczne i Humanistyczne, vol. 2,3]. Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka, 2012.
Google Scholar

Molinski, Waldemar. Theologie der Ehe in der Geschichte. Aschaffenburg: Paul Pattloch Verlag 1976.
Google Scholar

Navarrete, Urbano. “Commentarium ad allocutionem Ioannis Pauli II ad praelatos et officiales Rotae Romanae, die 27 ianuarii 1997 habitam.” Periodica de re canonica, vol. 86 (1997): 368–385.
Google Scholar

Müller, Hubert. “Communio als kirchenrechtliches Prinzip im Codex Iuris Canonici von 1983.” In Im Gespräch mit dem dreieinen Gott. Elemente einer trinitarischen Theologie. Festschrift zum 65. Ge-burtstag von Wilhelm Breuning, edited by Michael Böhnke and Hanspeter Heinz, 481–498. Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag, 1985.
Google Scholar

Navarrete, Urbano. Structura iuridica matrimonii secundum Concilium Vaticanum II. Momentum iuridicum amoris coniugalis. Roma: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 19942.
Google Scholar

Peña García, Carmen. “El fundamento de la absoluta indisolubilidad del matrimonio rato y consumado en la teología actual.” Estudios Eclesiásticos, vol. 79 (2004): 599–647.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “L’»alleanza« sistemica del diritto e della pastorale. Osservazioni sull’arte dell’applicazione del diritto nell’intera preparazione canonica alla celebrazione del matrimonio.” Annuarium Iuris Canonici, vol. 2 (2015): 75–93.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. Il bene dei coniugi. L’identificazione dell’elemento ad validitatem nella giurisprudenza della Rota Romana [Biblioteca Teologica, Sezione Canonistica, 7]. Lugano—Siena Eupress FTL–Edizioni Cantagalli, 2018.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Consent and Sacrament in the Orthodox Matrimonial Law. An Ecumenical Perspective.” In Conclusion of Marriage by Proxy in the Internal Law of Churches and Other Religious Associations, edited by L. Świto and M. Tomkiewicz [Studi Giuridici, vol. 58]. Città del Vaticano: LEV, 2018), 31–51.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Intima personarum et operum coniunctio – personalistyczny profil José Marii Serrano Ruiza idei małżeństwa kanonicznego.” In “Servabo legem tuam in toto corde meo.” Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana Księdzu Profesorowi Józefowi Krzywdzie CM, Dyrektorowi Instytutu Prawa Kanonicznego UPJPII z okazji 70. rocznicy urodzin, eds. Arkadiusz Zakręta, Andrzej Sosnowski, 397–410. Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2013.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Irrevocabilis consensus personalis. Antropologické předpoklady systému manželského práva v CCEO.” Studia Theologica, vol. 18, no. 2 (2016): 75–89.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. Istotne elementy małżeństwa. W nurcie odnowy personalistycznej. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2007.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “ ‘Już nie są dwoje, lecz stają się jednością’. Paradygmat antropologiczny wyznacznikiem prawnokanonicznego ujęcia natury węzła małżeńskiego.” In “Mężczyzną i niewiastą stworzył ich.” Afirmacja osoby ludzkiej odpowiedzią nauk teologicznych na ideologiczną uzurpację genderyzmu, edited by Andrzej Pastwa, 134–152. Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka, 2012.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Kanonické paradigma nerozlučitelnosti. O vztahu přirozenosti a kultury v katolickém chápání manželství.” Studia Theologica, vol. 22, no. 2 (2020): 85–98.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Il matrimonio: comprensione personalistica e istituzionale.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 25 (2013): 387–408.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej.“Przymierze miłości małżeńskiej.” Jana Pawła II idea małżeństwa kanonicznego. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2009.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. Realism of Personalist Vision of Marriage: Legal-canonical Cogitations. In Personalizmus v procese humanizácie ľudskej spoločnosti, edited by Pavol Dancák, 343–355. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, 2014.
Google Scholar

Pastwa, Andrzej. “Responsible Procreation – Co-Responsibility of Spouses. From Adequate Anthropology to the Legal Anthropology of Matrimony.” In Philosophy and Canon Law [Between the Culture of the Right to Responsible Parenthood and the Culture of the “New” Human Rights: Reproductive and Sexual], vol. 6 (2020): 37–55.
Google Scholar

Pius XI. Encyclical Letter Casti connubii (December 31, 1930).
Google Scholar

Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus. “Instructio »Dignitas connubii« servanda a tribunalibus dioecesanis et interdioecesanis in pertractandis causis nullitatis matrimonii (January 25, 2005).” Communicationes, vol. 37 (2005): 11–92.
Google Scholar

Pree, Helmut. “Die Ehe als Bezugswirklichkeit — Bemerkungen zur Individual- und Sozialdimension des kanonischen Eherechts.” Österreichisches Archiv für Kirchenrecht, vol. 33 (1982): 339–396.
Google Scholar

Puig, Fernando. La esencia del matrimonio a la luz del realismo jurídico.Pamplona: Navarra Gráfica Ediciones, 2004.
Google Scholar

Puig, Fernando. “Realismo giuridico e dottrina canonistica contemporanea sull’essenza del matrimonio.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 16 (2004): 433–453.
Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph. “Zur Theologie der Ehe.” Theologische Quartalschrift, vol. 149 (1969): 53–74.
Google Scholar

Sarmiento, Augusto. El matrimonio cristiano. Pamplona: EUNSA, 20073.
Google Scholar

Sentence of Nov. 26, 1992 coram Burke (Armagh). In Apostolicum Rotae Romanae Tribunal, Decisiones seu sententiae. Città del Vaticano: LEV, 84/1992, 577–587.
Google Scholar

Sentence of Mar. 26, 1998 coram Burke (Pelplinen). In Apostolicum Rotae Romanae Tribunal, Decisiones seu sententiae.Città del Vaticano: LEV, 90/1998, 259–281.
Google Scholar

Sentence of Oct. 29, 2012 coram Heredia Esteban (Paulopolitana et Minneapolitana), Prot. N. 20.428.
Google Scholar

Serrano Ruiz, José María. “L’esclusione del ‘consortium totius vitae,’ in La simulazione del consenso matrimoniale canonico, [Studi Giuridici, vol. 22]. Città del Vaticano: LEV 1990), 95–124.
Google Scholar

Serrano Ruiz, José María. L’ispirazione conciliare nei principi generali del matrimonio canonico. In Matrimonio canonico fra tradizione e rinnovamento, 13–78. Bologna 19912.
Google Scholar

Serrano Ruiz, José María. “Visione personale del matrimonio nel CCEO: aspetti sostanziali e di diritto procedurale.” Iura Orientalia, vol. 7 (2011): 121–139.
Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas. Summa theologica, vol. 1–6. Taurinii 1886.
Google Scholar

Vatican Council II. Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes on the Church (December 7, 1965).
Google Scholar

Viladrich, Pedro-Juan. “La famiglia sovrana.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 7 (1995): 539–550.
Google Scholar

Wojtyla, Cardinal Karol. The Acting Person. Translated by Andrzej Potocki, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing. Company, 1979.
Google Scholar

Wojtyla, Karol. Love and Responsibility. Translated by Harry T. Willetts. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1981.
Google Scholar

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021)
Published: 2021-12-31

ISSN: 2450-4955

eISSN: 2451-2141

10.31261/PaCL

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit

“Person” in CIC and CCEO Matrimonial Law. On the Idea of Vetera et Nova Harmonization in the Church Doctrine and Jurisprudence

Abstract

Keywords:

Andrzej Pastwa

Information