Bakke, Monika. “Nieantropocentryczna tożsamość?”. In Media–ciało–pamięć. O współczesnych tożsamościach kulturowych, edited by Andrzej Gwóźdź and Agnieszka Ćwikiel, 45–64. Warszawa: Instytut A. Mickiewicza, 2006.
Google Scholar
Barbrook, Richard. Imaginary Futures. From Thinking Machine to the Global Village. London: Pluto Pres, 2007.
Google Scholar
Bringsjord, Selmer. “Review of John Searle’s The Mystery of Consciousness.” Minds and Machines 10, no. 3 (2000): 457–459.
Google Scholar
Brownlee, John. “Microsoft: 2016 Will Be The Year Of AI.” http://www.fastcodesign.com/3054388/microsoft-2016-will-be-the-year-of-ai, accessed June 13, 2023.
Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. I and Thou. Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1937.
Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Sian Woods, Christina Kaouri, Michael L. Walters, Kheng L. Koay, and Iain P. Werry. “What Is a Robot Companion—Friend, Assistant or Butler?” Conference Paper. In IEEE Xplore International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2005): 1192–1197.
Google Scholar
De La Mettrie, Julien Offray. Man a Machine. Translated by Gertrude Carman Bussey. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1912. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52090/52090-h/52090-h.htm.
Google Scholar
Domańska, Ewa. “Humanistyka nie-antropocentryczna a studia nad rzeczami.” Kultura Współczesna 3 (2008): 9–21.
Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert Lederer, and Stuard E. Dreyfus. “Making a Mind vs. Modeling the Brain: AI Back at a Branchpoint.” Informatica 19, no. 4 (1995): 425–442.
Google Scholar
Fischler, Martin A., and Oscar Firschein. Intelligence: The Eye, the Brain, and the Computer. Boston, MA: Addison–Wesley, 1987.
Google Scholar
Fong, Terrence, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn, “A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, no. 3–4 (2003): 143–166.
Google Scholar
Griffiths, Catherine. The Question Concerning Technology. Last modified August 3, 2018. https://medium.com/@isohale/the-question-concerning-technology-ea159a8c22de.
Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology.” In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt, 3–35. New York–London: Garland Publishing Inc., 1977.
Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of ‘Science Studies’ to the Social Sciences.” The British Journal of Sociology 51, no. 1 (2000): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x.
Google Scholar
Lem, Stanisław. “Inteligencja, rozum, mądrość.” In Okamgnienie, 99–108. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 2022.
Google Scholar
Lem, Stanisław. “Golem XIV.” In Wielkość urojona, 101–171. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1973.
Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Ethics and Infinity. Translated by Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985.
Google Scholar
Maj, Anna. “O ewolucji robotów: mimesis w projektowaniu interakcji człowiek-maszyna od starożytnych automatów do robo creator.” In Wędrówki humanisty, edited by Anna Maj and Ilona Copik, 397–414. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Śląsk”, 2022.
Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. “Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines.” In Philosophical Perspectivesin Artificial Intelligence, edited by Martin Ringle. New York: Humanities Pres, 1979. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/ascribing.pdf, accessed November 16, 2023.
Google Scholar
Mori, Masahiro, “The Uncanny Valley.” First English translation authorized by M. Mori. Translated by Karl F. MacDorman and Norri Kageki, 12 June 2012. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-uncanny-valley, accessed November 16, 2023.
Google Scholar
Nowicki, Andrzej. Człowiek w świecie dzieł. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1974.
Google Scholar
Palomäki, Jussi, Anton Kunnari, Marianna Drosinou, Mika Koverola, Noora Lehtonen, Halonen Juho, Marko Repo, and Michael Laakasuo. “Evaluating the Replicability of ‘The Uncanny Valley’ Effect.” Heliyon 4, no. 11 (November 2018), e00939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00939; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260244/, accessed November, 16, 2023.
Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Google Scholar
Russo, Lucio. The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.
Google Scholar
Serov, Alexander. “Subjective Reality and Strong Artificial Intelligence.” ArXiv 1301.6359. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.6359.pdf, accessed November 16, 2023.
Google Scholar
Sloman, Aaron. “The Emperor’s Real Mind: Review of Roger Penrose’s The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics.” Artificial Intelligence 56, no. 2–3 (1992): 355–396.
Google Scholar
Szulc, Jolanta. “A Weak and Strong Artificial Intelligence. Development Prospects and Socio-Cultural Implications.” Ethos 36, no. 4 (144) (2023), forthcoming.
Google Scholar
Tischner, Józef. Filozofia dramatu. Kraków: Znak, 1998.
Google Scholar
Turing, Ian. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind LIX, no. 236 (October 1950): 433–460, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
Google Scholar
Wasielewska, Aleksandra, and Paweł Łupkowski. “Nieoczywiste relacje z technologią. Przegląd badań na temat ludzkich postaw wobec robotów.” Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 51 (2021): 165–187.
Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 2021.
Google Scholar
Winograd, Terry. “Thinking Machines: Can There Be? Are We?” Informatica 19, no. 4 (1995): 443–460.
Google Scholar
Wojewoda, Mariusz. “Artificial Intelligence as a Social Utopia.” Ethos 36, no. 4 (144) (2023): forthcoming.
Google Scholar