Juridical Relations between Freedom of Artistic Expression and Protection of the Dignity of Religion in the Light of a Lawsuit over Theatrical Performances in the Czech Republic

Damián Němec

doi:10.31261/PaCL.2023.09.2.06

Published: 2023-12-29

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)

Juridical Relations between Freedom of Artistic Expression and Protection of the Dignity of Religion in the Light of a Lawsuit over Theatrical Performances in the Czech Republic

Damián Němec

Section: Part One: Canon Law

https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2023.09.2.06

Abstract

This paper deals with the legal regulation of the relationship between two human rights, freedom of artistic creation and protection of the value of religion as part of freedom of religion in the Czech Republic. It first gives an overview of three models of this relationship in three historical epochs: the period of democratic Czechoslovakia in the years 1918 to 1948 (excluding the period of World War II, where the protection of human rights was completely ignored), the period of domination of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia in 1948 to 1989, that is, a period of general violations of human rights, and in a democratic society from 1989 (until 1992 in Czechoslovakia, from the disintegration of the Czechoslovak federation to January 1, 1993, in the Czech Republic). Most attention is paid to litigation caused by the presentation of two theater performances at the Brno Theater Festival in 2018. Both performances were directed by the Croat Oliver Frljić, known for controversial means of expression, often with a religious theme. The ensuing lawsuit, in which the then president of the Czech Bishops’ Conference was one of the plaintiffs, showed that the general courts preferred the protection of artistic freedom in the conflict between the two constitutionally guaranteed freedoms with only one significant restriction: vituperation or downsizing of beliefs. However, the dispute is not yet fully resolved: the plaintiffs have filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, which has not yet ruled on the matter. Consequently, an application to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg cannot be ruled out.

Keywords:

human rights , constitutional law , criminal law , freedom of artistic expression , religious freedom

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Němec, D. (2023). Juridical Relations between Freedom of Artistic Expression and Protection of the Dignity of Religion in the Light of a Lawsuit over Theatrical Performances in the Czech Republic. Philosophy and Canon Law, 9(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2023.09.2.06

Cited by / Share

References

Juridical Sources (sorted chronologically)
Google Scholar

Kaiserliches Patent Nr. 117/1852 RGBl., wodurch eine neue, durch die späteren Gesetze ergänzte, Ausgabe des Strafgesetzbuches über Verbrechen und schwere Polizei-Uebertretungen vom 3. September 1803, mit Aufnahme mehrerer neuer Bestimmungen, als alleiniges Strafgesetz über Verbrechen, Vergehen und Uebertretungen für den ganzen Umfang des Reiches, mit Ausnahme der Militärgränze, kundgemacht, und vom 1. September 1852 angefangen in Wirksamkeit gesetzt wird.
Google Scholar

Staatsgrundgesetz Nr. 142/1867 RGBl. vom 21. December 1867, über die allgemeinen Rechte der Staatsbürger für die im Reichsrathe vertretenen Königreiche und Länder.
Google Scholar

Act No. 11/1918 Coll., on establishment of the independent Czechoslovak state.
Google Scholar

Act No. 37/1918 Coll., on the Provisional Constitution.
Google Scholar

Act No. 121/1920 Coll., which introduces the Constitutional Charter of the Czechoslovak Republic.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 150/1948 Coll., Constitution of the Czechoslovak Republic.
Google Scholar

Act No. 86/1950 Sb., Penal Code.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 100/1960 Coll., Constitution of the Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic.
Google Scholar

Act No. 140/1961 Sb., Penal Code.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 143/1968 Coll., on the Czechoslovak Federation.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 135/1989 Coll., amending constitutional act No. 100/1960 Coll., the Constitution of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 23/1991 Coll., which introduces the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS as a constitutional act of the Federal Assembly of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 460/1992 Coll., Constitution of the Slovak Republic.
Google Scholar

Constitutional act No. 1/1993 Coll., Constitution of the Czech Republic.
Google Scholar

Resolution of the Presidency of the Czech National Council No. 2/1993 Coll., on the promulgation of the CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS as part of the constitutional order of the Czech Republic.
Google Scholar

Act No. 40/2009 Coll., Penal Code.
Google Scholar

Act No. 89/2012 Coll., Civil Code.
Google Scholar

Sentence of the Municipal Court in Brno File no. 112 C 88/2018-190 of 18 March 2019.
Google Scholar

Sentence of the Regional Court in Brno File no. 70 Co 170/2019-243 of 20 November 2019.
Google Scholar

Sentence of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic File no. 25 Cdo 1081/2020-282 of 28 April 2021.
Google Scholar

Constitutional complaint of His Eminence ThLic. Dominik Duka and of JUDr. ICLic. Ronald Němec, Ph.D. of 4 August 2021.
Google Scholar

Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic File No. II.ÚS 2120/21 of 4 October 2022, published on 11 October 2022.
Google Scholar

Literature
Google Scholar

“Biskupové nesouhlasí s divadelní hrou ‘Naše násilí a vaše násilí’ [Bishops Disagree with the Performance Our Violence and Your Violence],” 18.04.2018. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.cirkev.cz/cs/aktuality/180418biskupove-nesouhlasi-s-divadelni-hrou-nase-nasili-a-vase-nasili.
Google Scholar

“Biskupové nesouhlasí s divadelní hrou Naše násilí a vaše násilí. Muslimové se přidávají [Bishops Disagree with the Performance Our Violence, Your Violence. Muslims are Joining],” 20.04.2018. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://islam.cz/2018/04/20/biskupove-nesouhlasis-divadelni-hrou-nase-nasili-a-vase-nasili-muslimove-se-pridavaji/.
Google Scholar

Cibulka, Ľubor, and Marek Domin. “Ústava Slovenské republiky (1992) [Constitution of the Slovak Republic (1992)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 650–72. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

“Divadelní svět Brno 2018: Divadlo, tanec a svoboda [Theatre World Brno 2018: Theatre, Dance and Freedom],” 26.02.2018. Accessed November 16, 2021. http://www.mestohudby.cz/zpravodajstvi/divadelni-svet-brno-2018-divadlo-tanec-a-svoboda.
Google Scholar

“Jsou křesťané občané druhé kategorie? Tážou se odpůrci kontroverzní hry [Are Christians Second-class Citizens? Opponents of the Controversial Performance Ask],” 15.05.2018. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.idnes.cz/brno/zpravy/nase-nasili-a-vase-nasili-kontroverzni-hra-petice-krestansti-aktiviste.A180515_140626_brno-zpravy_krut.
Google Scholar

Klíma, Karel. “Ústava České republiky (1992) [Constitution of the Czech Republic (1992)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 610–31. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

“Kontroverzní hra Naše násilí a vaše násilí spustila smršť trestních oznámení [The controversial performance Our Violence, Your Violence triggered a whirlwind of complaints],” 29.05.2018. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://brnensky.denik.cz/zlociny-a-soudy/kontroverzni-hra-nase-nasili-a-vase-nasili-spustila-smrst-trestnich-oznameni-20180529.html.
Google Scholar

Polakovič, Pavel. “Ústavní návrhy politických stran (1990–1992) [Constitutional Proposals of Politic Parties (1990–1992)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 589–608. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Ryšavý, Zdeněk. “Ústavní návrhy (1946–1948) [Constitutional Proposals (1946–1948)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 524–6. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Ryšavý, Zdeněk. “Ústava Československé republiky (1948)—příprava [Constitution of the Czechoslovak Republic (1960)—Preparation].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 529–56. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Schelle, Karel. “Ústava Československé republiky—prozatímní [Constitution of the Czechoslovak Republic—Provisional].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 468–71. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Schelle, Karel. “Ústava Československé republiky (1920) [Constitution of the Czechoslovak Republic (1920)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 556–61. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Schelle, Karel. “Ústava Československé republiky (1948) [Constitution of the Czechoslovak Republic (1948)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 560–5. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Schelle, Karel. “Ústava Československé socialistické republiky (1960) [Constitution of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1960)].” In Encyklopedie českých právních dějin [Encyclopedia of Czech Legal History], vol. XIX, edited by Karel Schelle and Jaromír Tauchen, 468–71. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2020.
Google Scholar

Skandál s papežem v Teatru Powszechny [Scandal with the Pope at the Teatr Powszechny],” 23.02.2017. Accessed November 17, 2021. https://www.divadelni-noviny.cz/skandal-s-papezem-v-teatru-powszechny
Google Scholar

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Published: 2024-07-03

ISSN: 2450-4955

eISSN: 2451-2141

10.31261/PaCL

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit

Juridical Relations between Freedom of Artistic Expression and Protection of the Dignity of Religion in the Light of a Lawsuit over Theatrical Performances in the Czech Republic

Abstract

Keywords:

Damián Němec

Information