The generalized infimal convolution can be used to naturally prove some dominated monotone additive extension theorems



Abstract

By using a particular case of the generalized infimal convolution, we provide an instructive proof for a particular case of a dominated monotone additive extension theorem of Benno Fuchssteiner.


Keywords

preordered groups; generalized infimal convolution; dominated monotone additive extensions

1. Aczél J., Dhombres J., Functional Equations in Several Variables, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
2. Anger B., Lembcke J., Hahn–Banach type theorems for hypolinear functionals on preordered topological vector spaces, Pacific J. Math. 54 (1974), 13–33.
3. Aumann G., Über die Erweiterung von additiven monotonen Funktionen auf regulär geordneten Halbgruppen, Arch. Math. 8 (1957), 422–427.
4. Badora R., On the Hahn–Banach theorem for groups, Arch. Math. 86 (2006), 517–528.
5. Boccuto A., Candeloro D., Sandwich theorems and applications to invariant measures, Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 38 (1990), 511–524.
6. Burai P., Száz Á., Homogeneity properties of subadditive functions, Ann. Math. Inform. 32 (2005), 189–201.
7. Buskes G., The Hahn–Banach Theorem surveyed, Dissertationes Math. 327 (1993), 1–49.
8. Day M.M., Normed Linear Spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1962.
9. Figula Á., Száz Á., Graphical relationships between the infimum and intersection convolutions, Math. Pannon. 21 (2010), 23–35.
10. Fuchssteiner B., Sandwich theorems and lattice semigroups, J. Funct. Anal. 16 (1974), 1–14.
11. Fuchssteiner B., Lusky W., Convex Cones, North-Holland, New York, 1981.
12. Gajda Z., Sandwich theorems and amenable semigroups of transformations, Grazer Math. Ber. 316 (1992), 43–58.
13. Gajda Z., and Kominek Z., On separation theorems for subadditive and superadditive functionals, Studia Math. 100 (1991), 25–38.
14. Glavosits T., Kézi Cs., On the domain of oddness of an infimal convolution, Miskolc Math. Notes 12 (2011), 31–40.
15. Glavosits T., Száz Á., The infimal convolution can be used to easily prove the classical Hahn–Banach theorem, Rostock. Math. Kolloq. 65 (2010), 71–83.
16. Glavosits T., Száz Á., A Hahn–Banach type generalization of the Hyers–Ulam theorem, An. St. Univ. Ovidius Constanta 19 (2011), 139–144.
17. Glavosits T., Száz Á., Constructions and extensions of free and controlled additive relations, Tech. Rep., Inst. Math., Univ. Debrecen 1 (2010), 1–49.
18. Grilliot T.J., Extensions of algebra homomorphisms, Michigan Math. J. 14 (1967), 107–116.
19. Jameson G., Ordered Linear Spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.
20. Kuczma M., An Introduction to the Theory of Functional Equations and Inequalities, Polish Sci. Publ. and Univ. Šlaski, Warszawa, 1985.
21. Moreau J.J., Inf-convolution, sous-additivité, convexité des fonctions numériques, J. Math. Pures Appl. 49 (1970), 109–154.
22. Namioka I., Partially ordered linear topological spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1957), 1–50.
23. Narici L., Beckenstein E., The Hahn–Banach theorem: the life and times, Topology Appl. 77 (1997), 193–211.
24. Nef W., Monotone Linearformen auf teilgeordneten Vektorräumen, Monatsh. Math. 60 (1956), 190–197.
25. Peressini A.L., Ordered Topological Vector Spaces, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, 1967.
26. Plappert P., Sandwich theorem for monotone additive functions, Semigroup Forum 51 (1995), 347–355.
27. Roth W., Hahn–Banach type theorems for locally convex cones, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Ser. A) 68 (2000), 104–125.
28. Simons S., From Hahn–Banach to Monotonicity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
29. Strömberg T., The operation of infimal convolution, Dissertationes Math. 352 (1996), 1–58.
30. Száz Á., The intersection convolution of relations and the Hahn–Banach type theorems, Ann. Polon. Math. 69 (1998), 235–249.
31. Száz Á., A reduction theorem for a generalized infimal convolution, Tech. Rep., Inst. Math., Univ. Debrecen 11 (2009), 1–4.
32. Száz Á., The infimal convolution can be used to derive extension theorems from the sandwich ones, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 76 (2010), 489–499.
33. Száz Á., The intersection convolution of relations, Creative Math. Inf. 19 (2010), 209– 217.
Download

Published : 2011-09-30


GlavositsT., & Száz Árpád. (2011). The generalized infimal convolution can be used to naturally prove some dominated monotone additive extension theorems. Annales Mathematicae Silesianae, 25, 67-100. Retrieved from https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/AMSIL/article/view/14023

Tamás Glavosits  glavo@science.unideb.hu
Institute of Mathematics, University of Debrecen, Hungary  Hungary
Árpád Száz 
Institute of Mathematics, University of Debrecen, Hungary  Hungary



The Copyright Holders of the submitted text are the Author and the Journal. The Reader is granted the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution (CC BY). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

  1. License
    This journal provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.
  2. Author’s Warranties
    The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
  3. User Rights
    Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
  4. Co-Authorship
    If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.