https://doi.org/10.31261/fp.20895
The ways of argumentation analysed in the present article are meant to satisfy the postulate of investigating into what is first; they are based on the assumption that it is possible to arrive at what is first, and, while describing what is first, they refer to the opposition of light vs.
darkness. Such ways of argumentation can be found, inter alia, in the works of the Pre-Socratics, in the Platonic metaphor of the cave, in Aristotle’s texts, where he develops a theory of arriving at what is the first, in Plotinus’s vision in, and in many later conceptions referring in one way or another to the above mentioned Greek sources. Additionally, the author takes into consideration various problems arising from modem changes in philosophy and connected with the traditional questions about the function of the opposition between light and darkness and related ideas from the circle of metaphysics and theory of cognition. Paramount, in the argumentation of the first philosophers, is the relationship between pairs of opposite ideas such as light vs. darkness, or finite vs. infinite. The said relationship is one of the sources of the categories used in metaphysic and in theory of cognition. The Greeks put forward a model of the world in which light is partly responsible for the visible order; they made light penetrate the realm of cognition. Many fundamental philosophical terms (such as “the light of reason,” “idea,” “theory,” “intuition,” “clarity,” “obviousness”) are permeated with metaphors originating from the opposition between light and darkness. The terms in question are derived from figures involving the action of light, the relationship between murkiness and luminosity, the function, the function of eyesight and optical effects. The role of the discussed opposition is particularly remarkable in the current of thought known as “the metaphysics of light.” Changes in light metaphors are strictly connected with changes in ontological models. This correlation can be traced back to Greek models. The opposition between light and darkness has always been interpreted within a specific metaphysical framework.
Download files
Citation rules
Cited by / Share
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
Vol. 21 (2003)
Published: 2003-12-31
10.31261/fp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
English
Język Polski