Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order: The process of creating life. Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar

Alexander, C., Neis, H., Anninou, A., & King, I. F. (1987). A new theory of urban design (Vol. 6). Oxford University Press New York.
Google Scholar

Allen, G. L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding, bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 46–80). Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Altman, I. (1992). A transactional perspective on transitions to new environments. Environment and Behavior, 24(2), 268–280.
Google Scholar

Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar

Baggs, E., & Chemero, A. (2018). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese, 1–16.
Google Scholar

Bogucka, Z. (2011). Partycypacja w kształtowaniu przestrzeni miejskiej – psychologiczne spojrzenie na spójność przestrzeni w relacji do potrzeb wszystkich jej użytkowników: szczególny przypadek osób niewidomych. In K. Guranowska-Gruszecka (Ed.), Miasto zwarte, miasto rozproszone. Materiały ogólnopolskiej konferencji Doktorantów Wydziałów Architektury (pp. 113–120). Warszawa: Wydział Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej.
Google Scholar

Bogucka, Z. (2012). Choose the easiest path: comparison of urban design for ease of cognitive mapping by blind persons. Conference UD2012, Oslo, June 11–13 2012.
Google Scholar

Bogucka, Z. (2013). Design process: a role of soundscape perception in spatial ambience evaluation. Envisioning Architecture: Design, Evaluation, Communication; 11th Conference of the European Architectural Envisioning Association. Milan, September 25–28, 2013.
Google Scholar

Bogucka, Z. (2018). Nie-wizualne determinaty spójności i czytelności środowiska wybudowanego w kontekście relacji człowieka ze środowiskiem. Wytyczne do projektowania i ewaluacji przestrzeni miejskiej (PhD thesis). Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture.
Google Scholar

Böhme, G. (2017). The aesthetics of atmospheres. New York, London: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Google Scholar

Chelkoff, G. (2008). Ambience formers in built environment: An experimentation with sound and motion. In Sensory urbanism proceedings 2008, January 8th and 9th, 2008 University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (UK) (pp. 38–46). Glasgow, UK: The Flaneur Press.
Google Scholar

Çalışkan, O., & Mashhoodi, B. (2017). Urban coherence: A morphological definition. Urban Morphology, 21(2), 123–141.
Google Scholar

Dalton, R., & Bafna, S. (2003). The syntactical image of the city: A reciprocal definition of spatial elements and spatial syntaxes. In 4th international space syntax symposium. London.
Google Scholar

Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007).
Google Scholar

The temporal dynamics model of emotional memory processing: A synthesis on the neurobiological basis of stress-induced amnesia, flashbulb and traumatic memories, and the yerkes-dodson law. Neural Plasticity. doi: 10.1155/2007/60803
Google Scholar

Dolański, W. (1954). Czy istnieje „zmysł przeszkód” u niewidomych? Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Evans, G. W., & Cohen, S. (1987). Environmental stress. In I. A. D. Stokols (Ed.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 571–610). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Fiebig, A., Jordan, P., & Moshona, C. C., (2020). Assessments of Acoustic Environments by Emotions – The Application of Emotion Theory in Soundscape. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3261.
Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (1979/1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Google Scholar

Gohari, H. (2019). Structural analysis of the elements of lynch’s image of the city based on space syntax. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 172(4), 141–158.
Google Scholar

Golledge, R. G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 5–45). London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Golledge, R. G., & Stimson, R. J. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. New York, London: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Heft, H. (1997). The relevance of gibson’s ecological approach to perception for environment-behavior studies. In G. T. Moore & W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (Vol. 4, pp. 72–108). New York: Plenum.
Google Scholar

Henshaw, V. (2013). Urban smellscapes: Understanding and designing city smell environments. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine (electronic edition). London: Space Syntax.
Google Scholar

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Holl, P., S. (n.d.). Questions of perception: Phenomenology of architecture. San Francisco: William Stout Publishers.
Google Scholar

ISO. ISO 9241-210: 2010 ergonomics of human system interaction-part 210: Humancentred design for interactive systems, Pub. L. No. ISO 9241-210: 2010 (2010). Switzerland: International Standardization Organization (ISO).
Google Scholar

James, G. A. (1982). Tactual perception: A source-book. In E. F. W. Shiff (Ed.) (pp. 334–363). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Jiang, B. (2012). Computing the image of the city. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on informatics and urban and regional planning (pp. 111–121). University College Ghent, Ghent.
Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3–32.
Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.
Google Scholar

Koseoglu, E., & Onder, D. E. (2011). Subjective and objective dimensions of spatial legibility. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1191–1195.
Google Scholar

Koseoglua, E., & Camas, V. M. (2016). Examining interaction of city legibility and sense of security. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(6), 82–87.
Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, E., Bogucka, Z. (2011). How to investigate and improve the legibility of urban projects to make them understandable for blind people? Contribution of Social and Behavioural Sciences Methods to Design for All Approach. Journal of Biourbanism, 1, 41–58.
Google Scholar

Long, Y. (2008). The relationships between objective and subjective evaluations of the urban environment: Space syntax, cognitive maps, and urban legibility (PhD thesis). North Carolina State University.
Google Scholar

Long, Y., Baran, P. K., & Moore, R. (2007). The role of space syntax in spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the sixth international space syntax symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.
Google Scholar

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Mahdzar, S. S. S., & Safari, H. (2014). Legibility as a result of geometry space: Analyzing and comparing hypothetical model and existing space by space syntax. Life Science Journal, 11(8), 309–317.
Google Scholar

Metz, D. H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy, 7(2), 149–152.
Google Scholar

Moulay, A., Ujang, N., & Said, I. (2017). Legibility of neighbourhood parks as a predicator for enhanced social interaction towards social sustainability. Cities, 61, 58–64.
Google Scholar

Mulligan, C. G. (2004). Urban quality of life and public policy: A survey. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 266, 729–802.
Google Scholar

Nasar, J. L. (1988). Environmental aesthetic. Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Passini, R. (1996). Wayfinding design: Logic, application and some thoughts on universality. Design Studies, 17(3), 319–331.
Google Scholar

Perez-Gomez, A. (1999). Hermeneutics as discourse in design. Design Issues, 15(2), 71–79.
Google Scholar

Porteous, J. D. (1996). Environmental aesthetics. Ideas, politics and planning. London-New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Preiser, W., & Smith, K. H. (2011). Universal design handbook (second edition). McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.Rproject.org/.
Google Scholar

Rodaway, P. (1994). Sensuous geographies: Body, sense and place. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.
Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (1988). Affective appraisal of environments. In J. L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application (pp. 120–130). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311–322.
Google Scholar

Russell, L. J. A. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 848–856.
Google Scholar

Russell, W., J. A. (1981). Affective quality attributed to environments: A factor analytic study. Environment and Behavior, 13(3), 259–288.
Google Scholar

Salingaros, N. A. (1998). Theory of the urban web. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 53–71.
Google Scholar

Salingaros, N. A. (2000). Complexity and urban coherence. Journal of Urban Design, 5(3), 291–316.
Google Scholar

Santos, L. R., & Gendler, T. (2014). Knowing is half the battle. Edge. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25436.
Google Scholar

Schafer, R. M. (1977). The tuning of the world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Google Scholar

Schumacher, P. (2012). The autopoiesis of architecture. A new agenda for architecture (Vol. II). John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Shiff, W., & Foulke, E. (1982). Tactual perception: A source-book. (E. F. W. Shiff, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Stamps, A. E. (2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 1–16.
Google Scholar

Thibaud, J. (2011). The sensory fabric of urban ambiances. Senses and Society, 6(2), 203–215.
Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2010). Architectural and urban atmospheres. In D. Sauter, C. Hogertz, M. Tight, R. Thomas, & D. Zaidel (Eds.), PQN final report – part b4: Documentation – measuring walking (pp. 53–68). Cheltenham, UK: WALK21.
Google Scholar

Wohlwill, J. F. (1974). Human adaptation to levels of environmental stimulation. Human Ecology, 2(2), 127–147.
Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482.
Google Scholar