Model review form

1. Questionnaire

How do you assess the consistency of the topic of the article with the profile of the journal?

(a) the subject matter of the article corresponds to the profile of the journal;

(b) the subject matter of the article needs to be re-profiled to match the profile of the journal;

(c) the subject matter of the article does not match the profile of the journal.

How do you assess the general level of the text?

(a) distinctive;

(b) good;

(c) acceptable after necessary changes;

(d) low, difficult to accept.

Is the research conducted by the author of the article characterised by novelty and originality?

(a) the research is original and makes a significant contribution to the development of the discipline;

(b) the research has a certain originality and contribution to the development of the discipline;

(c) the research is not original and makes little contribution to the development of the discipline;

(d) the research is secondary and makes no contribution to the development of the discipline.

The language level of the publication is as follows:

(a) appropriate to the nature of the journal and the reasoning is conducted in accordance with the rules adopted within the discipline;

(b) too journalistic, with a large number of simplifications;

(c) not in line with the requirements of the scientific work.

Recommendation:

(a) the text is recommended for publication;

(b) the text needs to be amended - once amended, it may be recommended for publication; (c) the text should be rejected.

If the text needs to be amended, what should be taken into account:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………