Three Tools for Sonic Rupture: Translating Ambiance, Biophilic Sound Design and More-Than-Human Listening

Jordan Lacey

doi:10.31261/LC.2022.02.02

Published: 2022-06-28

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022)

Three Tools for Sonic Rupture: Translating Ambiance, Biophilic Sound Design and More-Than-Human Listening

Jordan Lacey

Section: Perception and experience

https://doi.org/10.31261/LC.2022.02.02

Abstract

Sounds of the city shape everyday perception; thus, as sounds change, so do our moods and responses to the environments in which we live. This article is part of a discourse trying to recognise the essential role that soundscape design should play in urban planning to improve quality of life experiences. It aims to discuss three tools for creating sonic ruptures in urban environments: translating ambiance, biophilic sound design, and more-than-human listening. The three tools are related to the sonic rupture concept, introduced as a form of soundscape design focused on improving the quality of life for urban dwellers and creating new possible approaches for urban design. Translating ambiance leverages ambiance theory to explore the prospects of translating the affective qualities of the natural world into cities. The biophilic sound design tool combines biophilic design and field recording practices to discover innovative ways to bring the sounds of nature into
the city. The more-than-human listening tool explores the possible recordings that multi-microphone arrays can make in natural environments that, while impossible to hear with the human ear, can be integrated into urban installations. In combination, this suite of tools presents new ways of thinking about the roles artistic
research can play in urban soundscape design as a means to expand the range of human experience – and thus the quality of life – in urban environments. The nature term, as used here, refers to those expanses of land free of urban development that present unique sonic experiences and expressions to the artistic researcher, which can be applied to urban design. The described approach has been tested in the creation of the Sonic Gathering Place, an installation that integrates the three post-sonic rupture tools, which will be touched on briefly in this paper.

Keywords:

soundscape design , sound art , urban design , biophilia , creative practice

Download files

PDF

Cited by / Share

References

Anderson, S. (2016). The Incidental Person: Reviewing the Identity of the Urban Acoustic Planner. Journal of Sonic Studies, 11. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/558606/558694
Google Scholar

Auinger, S., Odland, B. (2009). Reflections on the Sonic Commons. Leonardo Music Review, 42, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1162/lmj.2009.19.63
Google Scholar

Augoyard, J. (2007). Step by Step: Everyday Walks in a French Urban Housing Project. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.5.714
Google Scholar

Augorayd, J. Torgue, H. (2005). Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds (A. McCartney & D. Paquette, Trans.). Montreal: McGill University Press.
Google Scholar

Axelsson, O., Nilsson, M. E., & Berglund, B. (2010). A principal components model of soundscape perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3493436
Google Scholar

Ballas, J. A. (2000). The niche hypothesis: Implications for auditory display design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 3, 718-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004402258
Google Scholar

Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC.
Google Scholar

Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., Maguire, P. (2003). Why Action Research? Action Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
Google Scholar

Carter, P. (2004). Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publication.
Google Scholar

Fraisse, V., Wanderly, M. M., Guastavino, C. (2021). Comprehensive Framework for Describing Interactive Sound Installations. Highlighting Trends through a Systematic Review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5040019
Google Scholar

Haseman, B. (2006). A Manifesto for Performative Research. Media International Australia, 118(1), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0611800113
Google Scholar

Kang, J., Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2016). Soundscape and the Built Environment. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19145
Google Scholar

Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Google Scholar

Krause, B (1993). The Niche Hypothesis: A virtual symphony of animal sounds, the origins of musical expression and the health of habitats. The Soundscape Newsletter, 6, 6–10.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J. (2016). Sonic Rupture: a practice-led approach to urban soundscape design. Bloomsbury: New York.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Moore, S. Pink, S. Zhao, L. Harvey, X. Qiu, S. Sumartojo, Maisch, S. (2017). Soundscape Design of Motorway Parkland Environments – Transformation, Cancellation, and Ethnography. Proceedings Invisible Places: sound, urbanism and a sense of place. 7–9 April 2017, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal, 52-63.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J. (2020) Sound Installations for the Projection of Atmosphere as a Limited Field of Sounds. In Michael Bull and Marcel Cobussen (Eds.). The Bloomsbury Handbook of Sonic Methodologies, 315-324. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Castro R., Craenen P., Moore S. (2020a). Toward the Possibilities of Urban Sound Parks in Ambiances, Alloaesthesia: Senses, Inventions, Worlds. Proceedings for the 4th International Congress on Ambiances. E-conference, Dec 2020, 330-335.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Pink S., Harvey, L. Moore, S. (2019). Noise transformation: A critical listening-based methodology for the design of motorway soundscapes. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(1), pp. 49-64.
Google Scholar

Lacey, J. (2022) Urban Roar: a psychophysical approach to the design of affective environments. New York: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Pink, S., Lacey, J., Harvey, L., Sumartojo S., Duque, M., Moore, S. (2019). Recycling traffic noise: transforming sonic automobilities for revalue and well being. Mobilities, 14(2), pp. 233-249.
Google Scholar

Schafer, R. M. (1977). The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester: Destiny Books.
Google Scholar

Thibaud, J. (2011). A Sonic Paradigm of Urban Ambiances. Journal of Sonic Studies, 1. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/220589/220590
Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge–London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022)
Published: 2024-06-21

eISSN: 2720-6122

10.31261/LC

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit