Ajzen I., Nature and operation of attitudes, „Annual Review of Psychology” 52 (2001), s. 27-58.
Altheide D.L., The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear, „Sociological Quarterly” 38,4 (1997), s. 647-668.
Bavelas J.B., Situations that lead to disqualification, „Human Communication Research” 9,2 (1983), s. 130-145.
Bernays E.L., Propaganda, Wrocław 2020.
Chaiken S., The heuristic model of persuasion, w: Social influence. The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, red. M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson, C.P. Herman, Hillsdale 1987, s. 3-39.
Chappell H.W., Campaign advertising and political ambiguity, „Public Choice” 79,3-4 (1994), s. 281-303.
Cwalina W., Drzewiecka M., How trust wins against criticism: Promise concept as a political branding tool. Lessons from Polish politics, w: Political branding in turbulent times, red. M. Moufahim, Cham 2022, s. 123-140.
Cwalina W., Falkowski A., Constructivist mind: False memory, freedom, and democracy, „Journal of Political Marketing” 7,3/4 (2008), s. 239-255.
Cwalina W., Falkowski A., Koniak P., Mackiewicz R., Wieloznaczność w przekazach politycznych, Sopot 2015.
Cwalina W., Falkowski A., Marketing polityczny. Perspektywa psychologiczna, Gdańsk 2005.
Cwalina W., Falkowski A., Newman B.I., Persuasion in the political context: Opportunities and threats, w: Handbook of persuasion and social marketing, Vol. 1, red. D.W. Stewart, Santa Barbara 2015, s. 61-128.
Cwalina W., Koniak P., Narzucanie ram interpretacji problemów i strategiczna wieloznaczność w manipulacji politycznej, w: Przestrzenie manipulacji społecznej, red. D. Doliński, M. Gamian-Wilk, Warszawa 2014, s. 299-344.
de Vreese C.H., News framing: Theory and typology, „Information Design Journal + Document Design” 13,1 (2005), s. 51-62.
Denton R.E., Woodward G.C., Jak zdefiniować komunikacje polityczną, w: Władza i społeczeństwo 2. Antologia tekstów z zakresu socjologii polityki, red. J. Szczupaczyński, Warszawa 1998, s. 193-206.
Druckman J.N., Competing frames in a political campaign, w: Winning with words: The origins and impact of framing, red. B.F. Schaffner, P.J. Sellers, New York 2010, s. 101-120.
Dunegan K.J., Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full, „Journal of Applied Psychology” 78,1 (1993), s. 491-503.
Edelman M., Political language and political reality, „PS: Political Science & Politics” 18,1 (1985), s. 10.
Entman R.M., Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy, Chicago 2004.
Fiorina M.P., Abrams S.J., Pope J.C., Culture war? The myth of a polarized America, New York 2006.
Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E., Social cognition: From brains to culture, New York 2008.
Golec A., Konflikt polityczny: myślenie i emocje, Warszawa 2002.
Grietēna, I., Vagueness of expression in public speeches: Interpreter’s strategies and techniques, „Filologija” 15 (2010), s. 28-41.
Heller M., Niekricz A., Utopia u władzy. Historia Związku Sowieckiego: Od narodzin do wolności 1917-1939, Poznań 2016.
Jowett G.S., O’Donnell V., Propaganda and persuasion, Thousand Oaks 2012.
Lakoff G., The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics, New York 2009.
Leventhal T., Iraqi propaganda and disinformation during the Gulf War: Lessons for the future, Abu Dhabi 1999.
Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M.R., Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 37,11 (1979), s. 2098-2109.
Milburn M.A., Conrad S.D., Sala F., Carberry S., Childhood punishment, denial, and political attitudes, „Political Psychology” 16,3 (1995), s. 447-478.
Mutz D.C., Sniderman P.M., Brody R.A., Political persuasion: The birth of a field of study, w: Political persuasion and attitude change, red. D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman, R.A. Brody, Ann Arbor 1996, s. 1-14.
Nelson T.E., Policy goals, public rhetoric, and political attitudes, „Journal of Politics” 66,2 (2004), s. 581-605.
Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T., Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, New York 1986.
Pratkanis A., Aronson E., Wiek propagandy, Warszawa 2005.
Pratkanis A.R., Turner M.E., Persuasion and democracy: Strategies for increasing deliberative participation and enacting social change, „Journal of Social Issues” 52,1 (1996), s. 187-205.
Sanford A.J., Fay N., Stewart A., Moxey L., Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology, „Psychological Science” 13,2 (2002), s. 130-134.
Simons H.W., Persuasion in society, Thousand Oaks 2001.
Smith A.C.T., Cognitive mechanisms of belief change, London 2016.
Tuman J.S., Political communication in American campaigns, Thousand Oaks 2008.
Wojciszke B., Psychologia społeczna, Warszawa 2011.
Woodward G.C., Korupcja dyskursu politycznego: cztery odmiany, w: Władza i społeczeństwo, t. 2: Antologia tekstów z zakresu socjologii polityki, red. J. Szczupaczyński, Warszawa 1998, s. 207-215.
Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak D., Językowe środki perswazji w kazaniu, Kraków 1996.
Zimbardo P.G., The tactics and ethics of persuasion, w: Attitudes, conflicts, and social change, red. B.T. King, E. McGinnies, New York 1972, s. 81-99.
Google Scholar