Reflections on complexity: TESOL researchers reflect on their experiences
Abstract
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST), or complexity, is increasingly being used as a theoretical framework in Applied Linguistics. In this article, we present the reflections of researchers in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) about how they have made use of complexity in their work. The aim of this article is to take stock of how it is being used in the field, the challenges and benefits it provides, as well as inspiration for future work from this theoretical perspective. In the first part of the article, we present a concise overview of CDST, focusing specifically on three salient features: its holistic lens, its non-linear perspective on causality, and its focus on emergence and self-organisation. We also take stock of how complexity perspectives have been used to inform research in a variety of applied linguistics topics. We then move on to present narratives provided by nine academics who have employed CDST in their work, which we synthesise with a view to showing how the theory has gradually developed in TESOL. Early encounters of the field with CDST were usually serendipitous, but the theory has so far proved to be useful, both on account of its descriptive power and because of its phenomenological validity. A common theme in the narratives of these experiences of complexity researchers is that complexity is associated with a steep learning curve, compounded by terminological opacity, and conceptual challenges. However, their responses also indicate optimism regarding the potential of the theory to inform research in TESOL and applied linguistics more generally.
Keywords
SLA; language learning; complex dynamics systems theory
References
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., ... and Schoenemann, T. (2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59 (s1), 1-26.
Byrne, D. (1998) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Byrne, D. and Callaghan, G. (2013) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2), 135-147.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S.L. and Verspoor, M. (2013) Dynamic system theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M.d.P.G.Mayo, M.J.G. Mangado and M.M. Adrián (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 199-220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Davis, B. and Sumara, D.J. (2006) Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Earthy, S. and Cronin, A. (2008) Narrative analysis. In N. Fielding (ed.) Researching Social Life. (3rd edn., pp. 420-439). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Feryok, A. (2010) Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System 38 (2), 272-279.
Gleick, J. (1987) Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking.
Henry, A. (2016) Conceptualizing teacher identity as a complex dynamic system: The inner dynamics of transformations during a practicum. Journal of Teacher Education 67 (4), 291-305.
Hohenberger, A. and Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2009) Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics 47 (2), 481-511.
Kostoulas, A. (2018) A Language School as a Complex System. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Kostoulas, A. and Stelma, J. (2016) Intentionality and complex systems theory: A new direction for language learning psychology. In C. Gkonou, D. Tatzl and S. Mercer (eds.), New Directions in Language Learning Psychology (pp. 7-23). Cham: Springer.
Kostoulas, A., Stelma, J., Mercer, S., Cameron, L. and Dawson, S. (2017). Complex systems theory as a shared discourse space for TESOL. TESOL Journal. Advance access. doi: 10.1002/tesj.317.
King, J. (2013) Silence in the Second Language Classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.
King, J. (ed.) (2015) The Dynamic Interplay Between Context and the Language Learner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18 (2), 141−165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mauranen, A. (2012) Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, S. (2011a) Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System 39 (3), 335-346.
Mercer, S. (2011b) Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System 39 (4), 427-436.
Mercer, S. (2016) Complexity and language teaching. In G. Hall (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 473-485). London: Routledge.
Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2012) The dynamic matching of neural and cognitive growth cycles. Nonlinear Dynamics - Psychology and Life Sciences 16 (1), 61-78.
Sampson, R.J. (2015). Tracing motivational emergence in a classroom language learning project. System 50, 10-20.
Seidlhofer, B. (2011) Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spoelman, M. and Verspoor, M. (2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31 (4), 532-553.
Stelma, J., Onat-Stelma, Z., Lee, W.-J. and Kostoulas, A. (2015) Intentional dynamics in TESOL: An ecological perspective. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 15 (1), 14-32.
Stern, H.H. (1983) Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching: Historical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Applied Linguistic Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. and Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011) A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
University of Graz Austria
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-2733
University of Graz Austria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
