The Impact of Orthographic Transparency and Typology on L2 Learner Perceptions
Abstract
While there is substantial research on literacy in the L1, factors impacting literacy in the L2 remain understudied. Preliminary research indicates that orthographic accuracy and typology influence literacy acquisition, indicating these aspects of linguistic representation need further exploration within the context of second-language acquisition (SLA). Additionally, SLA research on individual learner differences highlights emotional factors such as attitude and motivation, which are widely considered critical indicators of L2 success. Motivation is closely linked to perceptions towards the L2, which indicates learner perceptions of L2 literacy could impact success in learning to read and write. As such, this paper presents a cross-lingual, mixed-methods study that compares the orthographic transparency and typologies of 26 languages against learners’ (n = 217) perceptions of L2 literacy acquisition, such as perceived difficulty of the orthography and a self-assessment of literacy skills. Results indicated that orthographic transparency has a greater impact on learners’ perceptions compared to typology alone.
Keywords
phonology; orthography; L2 literacy; literacy acquisition; learner perceptions; grapholinguistics
References
Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., Putzolu, A., Notarnicola, A., Iaia, M., & Burani, C. (2018). Learning to spell in a language with transparent orthography: Distributional properties of orthography and whole-word lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1275715
Association for Japanese-Language Teaching (2020). Japanese for Busy People Series. Association for Japanese-Language Teaching Webpage. Retrieved on 15 September 2021. Retrieved from http://www.ajalt.org/english/textbooks/japanese_for_busy_people.html
Bassetti, B. (2005). Effects of writing systems on second language awareness: Word awareness in English learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds), Second language writing systems (pp. 335–356). Multilingual Matters LTD.
Borleffs, E., Maassen, B., Lyytinen, H., & Zwarts, F. (2017). Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: A narrative review. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2006). Morphemes and literacy: A starting point. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds), Improving literacy by teaching morphemes (pp. 3–34). Routledge.
Carlisle, J. F. (2004). Morphological processes that influence learning to read. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 318–339). Guilford Press.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
Cook, V., & Bassetti, B. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 1–70). Multilingual Matters LTD.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Blackwell Publishing.
Doyle, M. (2013). Marie M. Clay’s theoretical perspective: A literacy processing theory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 636–656). International Reading Association.
Eviatar, Z., Taha, H., & Shwartz, M. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy among semitic-bilingual learners: A cross-language perspective. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1869–1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9850-9
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold Publishers LTD.
Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.
Havron, N., & Arnon, I. (2017). Reading between the words: The effect of literacy on second language lexical segmentation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000138
Kim, S. A., Packard, J., & Christianson, K. (2016). Orthographic consistency and individual learner differences in second language literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1409–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9643-y
Koda, K. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness in L2 reading. Second Language Research, 14, 194–215.
Koda, K. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 311–334). Multilingual Matters.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. In K. Koda (Ed.), Reading and language learning (pp. 1–44). University of Michigan Press.
Lau, L. H.-S., & Rickard Liow, S. J. (2005). Phonological awareness and spelling skill development in biscriptal children. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 357–371). Multilingual Matters LTD.
Marjou, X. (2021). OTEANN: Estimating the transparency of orthographies with an artificial neural network. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Typology and Multilingual NLP. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.sigtyp-1.1.
Meletis, D. (2020). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics. Grapholinguistics and its applications. Flexus Editions: Brest, France.
Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. (2004). Cognitive factors in second-language acquisition and literacy learning. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 73–81). Guilford Press.
Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53(1), 13–24.
Paxton, S., & Svetenant, C. (2014). Tackling the Kanji hurdle: Investigation of Kanji learning in non-Kanji background learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(3), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2013.519
Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. University of Michigan Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing Systems. Reading and Writing, 18, 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
Perfetti, C. A., Zchang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3
Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 864–894). International Reading Association.
Samuels, S. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 816–837). International Reading Association.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
Snider, K. (2014). Orthography and phonological depth. In M. Cahill & K. Rice (Eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages (pp. 27–48). SIL International.
Swadesh, M. (1934). The phonemic principle. Language, 10(2), 117–129.
Torgesen, J. K. (1999). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. In Hugh W. Catts & Alan G. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 128–153). Allyn and Bacon.
Windsor, J. (2000). The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4301.50
Willis Oko, Christina M. (2018). Orthography development for Darma (The case that wasn’t). Language Documentation and Conservation, 12, 15–46. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24761
Zhang, H., & Roberts, L. (2019). The role of phonological awareness and phonetic radical awareness in acquiring Chinese literacy skills in learners of Chinese as a second language. System, 18, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.02.007
University of North Texas United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7650-3478
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
