Diagnostic Abilities of Novice Teachers
Abstract
This paper discusses diagnostic abilities of novice teachers of English as a foreign language in Poland as demonstrated through analyzing critical incidents (CIs). A case study, designed to explore patterns and regularities in cognitive processes that practitioners activate to examine disorienting situations in their educational context, provided evidence of effective mental work of beginner teachers at the verbal and conceptual levels. Specifically-structured written reports on what the instructors considered critical moments in their teaching practice served as a tool to verbalize how they represent, interpret, and value phenomena in the FL classroom by activating and integrating various sources of professional knowledge. The data analysis, which included both identification of the character of mental representations the subjects stimulated during the recall as well as higher order thinking operations on these representations, led to the conclusion that the inexperienced teachers show a degree of efficacy to register relations and variation in classroom realities, to problematize the unproblematic, to take position on matters, and to formulate relevant feedback for their future didactic moves. This encourages a hypothesis that teachers’ diagnostic abilities are not necessarily determined by the current state of their professional expertise and that limited classroom experience does
not suppress adequate cognitive and affective responses to problems in beginner practitioners.
Keywords
novice teachers; diagnostic operations; critical incidents; cognitive processes
References
Alexander, P., Dinsmore, D., Fox, E., Grossnickle, E., Loughlin, S., Maggioni, L., et al. (2011). Higher order thinking and knowledge: Domain-general and domain-specific trends and future directions. In G. Schraw & D. Robinson (Eds.), Assessment of higher order thinking skills (pp. 47–88). Information Age Publishing.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Open Court.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. D. Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. V. Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 73–78). Elsevier Science.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education. Research and practice. Continuum Press.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (2004). On the long way from novice to expert, and how traveling changes the traveler. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 3–8). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Burns, A., Edwards, E., & Freeman, D. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585–601.
Day, C. (2004). A passion for teaching. Routledge Falmer.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049499
Eysenck, W. M., & Keane, T. M. (2010). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (6th ed.). Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Continuum Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (Ed.) (2009). Novice language teachers: Insights and perspectives for the first year. Equinox Publishing.
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. Language Teaching, 35(1), 1–13.
Gabryś-Barker, D. (2012). Reflectivity in pre-service teacher education. A survey of theory and practice. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161–182.
Goldie, P. (2000). The emotions: A philosophical exploration. OUP.
Golombek, P. R., & Johnson, K. E. (2004). Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: Examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second-language teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 307–327.
Gray, M. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2020). Individual differences in relational reasoning. Memory Cognition, 48, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00964-y
Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). Guilford Press.
Guerra, P. L., & Wubbena, Z. C. (2017). Teacher beliefs and classroom practices: Cognitive dissonance in high stakes test-influenced environments. Issues in Teacher Education, 26(1), 35–51.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Heitzman, N., Seidel, T., Opitz, A., Hetmanek, A., Wecker, C., Fischer, M., Ufer, S., Schmidmaier, R., Neuhaus, B., Siebeck, M., Stürmer, K., Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., Girwidz, R., & Fischer, F. (2019). Facilitating diagnostic competences in simulations: A conceptual framework and a research agenda for medical and teacher education. Frontline Learning Research, 7(4), 1–24.
Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117–142). Cambridge University Press.
Jagtap, A., & Guaro, R. (2016). The role of emotions in decision-making. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(5), 2080–2085.
Johnson, K. E. (1996). The vision versus the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman, & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 30–49). Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, K. E. (2007). Expertise research in language teaching: Some examples and some issues. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 51–72.
Johnson, W. (1998). Teachers in the classroom: An interview with Jack Millett. Language Teacher, 22(6), 7–8.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Kottmeyer, A. M., Van Meter, P. N., & Cameron, C. E. (2020). The role of representational system in relational reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000374
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Maynard, T., & Furlong, J. (1995). Mentoring student teachers. Routledge.
McManus, J. (2011). A new wave of sensation: The critical role emotions play in critical reflection. Presentation OLKC Making Waves Conference, 12–14 April, Hull University.
Mollon, P. (2000). The unconscious. Ideas in psychoanalysis. Icon Books.
Perry, R. (2003). Teaching practice: A guide for early childhood students. Routledge Flamer, Taylor and Francis Group.
Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–31). Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. Macmillan.
Rogers, C. R. (2002). Seeing students learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253.
Salminen-Tuomaala, M., Hallila, J., Niinimäki, A., & Paussu, P. (2020). The simulation coaching concept: A step towards expertise. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 10(4), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v10n4p83
Schraw, G. J., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. Information Age Publishing.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.
Strasser, A. (2010). A functional view toward mental representations. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge. Springer Media.
Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (1998). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 44 action strategies. Corwin Press.
Thagard, P. (2005). Mind. Introduction to cognitive science. MIT Press.
Tripp, D. (1993/2012). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgment. Routledge.
Tsui, B. M. A. (2005). Expertise in teaching: Perspectives and issues. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching, (pp. 167–189). Palgrave Macmillan.
West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012842
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.
American University of the Middle East Kuwait
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-7242
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
