Contributions toward Understanding the Acquisition of Eight Aspects of Vocabulary Knowledge
Abstract
With the intent of adding to the literature leading toward a more complete theory of second language vocabulary acquisition, this study elicited accuracy data from 110 ESL learners ranging from novice high to advanced low on 64 words randomly selected in the 2K–3K range of Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) (32 verbs, 24 nouns, 8 adjectives) covering eight aspects of word knowledge. These included spelling based on hearing the spoken form, selecting collocations based on the written form, pronunciation based on the written form, selecting inflections based on the written context, selecting the definition based on hearing the spoken form, selecting the written definition based on the written form, selecting appropriate derivations based on the written form, and selecting the written form based on the written definition. ANOVA results show accuracy levels varied across word knowledge aspects and that implicational scaling was possible with some but not all aspects of word knowledge examined simultaneously. In aggregation with other current and future studies, this has important implication for developing L2 vocabulary acquisition theory.
Keywords
second language vocabulary acquisition; aspects of word knowledge; implicational scaling
References
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2012). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012. https://www.actfl.org/resources/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
Atai, M. R., & Dabbagh, A. (2010). Exploring the role of vocabulary depth and semantic set in EFL learners’ vocabulary use in writing. Teaching English Language, 4(2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2010.66106
Barclay, S., & Schmitt, N. (2019). Current perspectives on vocabulary teaching and learning. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 799–819). Springer International.
Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524711.004
Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq031
Davies, M. (2008). Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
Davies, M., & Gardner, D. (2010). A frequency dictionary of American English: Word sketches, collocations, and thematic lists. Routledge.
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x
Ellis, R. (1988). The effects of linguistic environment on the second language acquisition of grammatical rules. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.3.257
Farvardin, M. T., & Koosha, M. (2011). The role of vocabulary knowledge in Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension performance: breadth or depth? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1575–1580. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.11.1575-1580
Farvardin, M. T., & Valipouri, L. (2017). Probing the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension of Iranian lower-intermediate EFL learners. International
Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5), 273–278. http://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.5p.273
Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 272–95). Blackwell.
Gardner, D. & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327.
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481–505.
Grace, C. (1998). Retention of word meanings inferred from context and sentence-level translations: Implications for the design of beginning level CALL software. The Modem Language Journal, 82(4), 533–544.
Gustafsson, M., & Malmström, H. (2013). Master level writing in engineering and productive vocabulary: What does measuring academic vocabulary levels tell us? In N.-L. Johannesson,
G. Melchers, & B. Björkman (Eds.), Of butterflies and birds, of dialects and genres (pp. 123–139). Stockholm Studies in English.
Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139–150.
Hakansson, G. (2013). Implicational Scaling. In P. Robinson (Ed), Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 293–294). Routledge.
Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). Design and statistics for applied linguistics: The research manuals. Newbury House.
Hu, M. & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(2), 403–430.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170–1204.
Kilic, M. (2019). Vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of performance in writing and speaking: A case of Turkish EFL learners. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 57, 133–164. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224421.pdf
Koizumi, R. (2005). Relationships between productive vocabulary knowledge and speaking performance of Japanese learners of English at the novice level. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tsukuba]. University of Tsukuba Repository. https://tsukuba.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=20705&item_no=1&attribute_id=17&file_no=2
Konstantakis, N. (2007). Creating a business word list for teaching English. Estudios de lingüstica inglesa aplicada, 7, 79–102.
Laufer, B. (1989). A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: Deceptive transparency. AILA review, 6(1), 10–20.
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28(1), 89–107.
Laufer, B., & Goldstein (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611–634.
Meara, P. (1983). Vocabulary in a second language, vol. 1. Specialised bibliography 3. CILT.
Mehrpour, M., Razmjoo, S. A., & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(22), 97–127.
Milton J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83–98). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692900-007
Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 127–147.
Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Measuring readiness for simplified material: A test of the first 1,000 words of English. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application (pp. 193–202). RELC.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
Nation, I.S.P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, 13(1), 14–36.
Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 31–55.
Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 1–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ759833.pdf
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282–307. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt273oa
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585941
Rickford, J. R. (2002). Implicational scales. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, and N. Schilling-Estes (Eds), The handbook of language variation and change. Blackwell.
Schmitt, N. (1995). The word on words: An interview with Paul Nation. Language Teacher, 19(2), 5–7. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/paul-nations-publications/publications/documents/1995-Interview-Norbert.pdf
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: what the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
Schmitt, N. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 52(2), 261–274.
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
Teng, F. (2014). Assessing the depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge with listening comprehension. PASAA: A Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 48(2), 29–56. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077893.pdf
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education Limited.
Valipouri, L., & Nassaji, H. (2013). A corpus-based study of academic vocabulary in chemistry research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 248–263.
Wang, J., Liang, S., & Ge, G. (2008). Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 442–458.
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(01), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050023
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T.S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2017). Assessing L2 vocabulary depth with word associates format tests: Issues, findings, and suggestions. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0024-0
Zimmerman, K. J. (2004). The role of vocabulary size in assessing second language proficiency. [Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University]. BYU Scholars Archive. http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=etd
Brigham Young University United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-7410
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
