References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic literature review.
Google Scholar

*Abdelrahman, M. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 139–151.
Google Scholar

*Adli, N., & Mahmoudi, A. (2017). Reading comprehension questions in EFL textbooks and learners’ levels. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 590–595. https://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.07074
Google Scholar

*Akrong, B. S., Chaka, C., & van der Walt, C. (2021). A modified version of Bloom’s taxonomy and critical language awareness: Evaluating EAL textbooks for junior high schools in Ghana through a critical literacy approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 10(4), 106–115.
Google Scholar

*Alfadda, H., Fatima, M., Ghaffar, A., & Afzaal, M. (2020). Critical thinking perspective in ESL new English textbooks: A case study of Pakistan. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(2), 24–31.
Google Scholar

*Alfaki, I. (2014). Sudan English language syllabus: Evaluating reading comprehension questions using Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(3), 53–74.
Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American psychological association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar

Alnofaie, H. (2013). A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programmes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 154–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.002
Google Scholar

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E, Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Addison and Wesley.
Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606.
Google Scholar

*Askaripour, S. A. A. (2014). A textbook evaluation of new version of Top Notch English series. English for Specific Purposes World, 15(44), 1–30.
Google Scholar

*Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbook’s questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100–110.
Google Scholar

*Azizi, M. (2012). Critical thinking in General English course books taught in Iranian Universities. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation, 1(3), 15–36.
Google Scholar

Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 25–42.
Google Scholar

*Birjandi, P., & Alizadeh, I. (2013). Manifestation of critical thinking skills in the English textbooks employed by language institutes in Iran. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(1), 27–38.
Google Scholar

Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longman.
Google Scholar

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles. Pearson Education.
Google Scholar

Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104–126.
Google Scholar

Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1999). BICS and CALP: Clarifying the distinction. Washington, DC: Opinion Papers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 438 551). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED438551
Google Scholar

*Dabbagh, A., & Safaei, A. (2019). Comparative textbook evaluation: Representation of learning objectives in locally and internationally published ELT textbooks. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 249–277.
Google Scholar

Dummett, P., & Hughes, J. (2019). Critical thinking in ELT: A working model for the classroom. National Geographic Learning.
Google Scholar

Dummett, P. (2016). How to write critical thinking activities. ELT Teacher 2 Writer.
Google Scholar

*Es-Salhi, A., & Elfatihi, M. (2019). Evaluating critical thinking skills in Moroccan EFL textbooks: Gateway to English 2 as a case. Higher Education of Social Science, 17(1), 13–22. http://doi.org/10.3968/11284
Google Scholar

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2012). Critical thinking: Competency standards essential to the cultivation of intellectual skills, Part 4. Journal of Developmental Education, 35(3), 30–31.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42.
Google Scholar

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Google Scholar

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Academic Press. Retrieved from https://courseware.e-education.psu.edu/downloads/geog882/Critical%20Thinking%20What%20it%20is%20and%20why%20it%20counts.pdf
Google Scholar

Fahim, M., Barjesteh, H., & Vaseghi, R. (2012). Effects of critical thinking strategy training on male/female EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 5(1), 140–145.
Google Scholar

*Fitriani, D. H., & Kirana, D. P. (2022). Higher order thinking skill (hots) in English language textbook in senior high school. International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 55–66.
Google Scholar

*Freahat, N. M., & Smadi, O. M. (2014). Lower-order and higher-order reading questions in secondary and university level EFL textbooks in Jordan. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.9.1804-1813
Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Golpour, F. (2014). Critical Thinking and EFL learners’ performance on different writing modes. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 103–119.
Google Scholar

*Gordani, Y. (2010). An analysis of English textbooks used at Iranian guidance schools in terms of Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(2), 249–278.
Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 89, 69–74.
Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2002). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 69–74.
Google Scholar

*Hei, J. X. (2017). Thinking skills in the 12th grade English course book in Timor Leste. Beyond Words, 5(1), 32–45.
Google Scholar

Hughes, J. (2014). Critical thinking in the language classroom. Recanati (Italy): ELI. Retrieved from: http://www.elionline.com/eng/teachers-area/critical-thinking
Google Scholar

Ilyas, H. P. (2015). Critical thinking: Its representation in Indonesian ELT textbooks and education [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of York.
Google Scholar

*Igbaria, A. K. (2013). A content analysis of the WH-Questions in the EFL textbook of Horizons. International Education Studies, 6(7), 200–224. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p200
Google Scholar

*Jebbour, M. (2019). Exploring the manifestation of critical thinking in the Moroccan textbooks of English: The case of Ticket 2 English. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 4(1), 39–45.
Google Scholar

Jones, E., Hoffman, S., Moore, L., Ratcliff, G., Tibbetts, S. & Glick, B. (1995). Essential Skills in Writing. Speech and Listening. and Critical Thinking for College Graduates: Perspectives of Faculty, Employers, and Policy Makers. Project summary, U.S. Department of Education, OERI Contract No. R117GI0037. National Center for Post-secondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
Google Scholar

*Khodadady, E., & Karami, M. (2017). An evaluation of textbooks designed for advanced English learners within a foreign context: A critical thinking perspective. Porta LINGUARUM, 28, 95–109.
Google Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Google Scholar

Lin, Y. (2018). Developing critical thinking in EFL classes. Springer.
Google Scholar

Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 179–211). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson.
Google Scholar

*Margana, & Widyantoro, A. (2017). Developing English textbooks oriented to higher order thinking skills for students of vocational high schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 26–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.04
Google Scholar

McDonough, J., Shaw, C. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar

*Mizbani, M., & Chalak, A. (2017). Analyzing reading and writing activities of Iranian EFL textbook Prospect 3 based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 13–27.
Google Scholar

Moher D, Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D., the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–270.
Google Scholar

Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506–522.
Google Scholar

Moore, B. & Parker, R. (2009). Critical thinking (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Google Scholar

*Muchlis, M. (2015). An analysis of thinking order of reading comprehension questions in English textbook for young foresters of Forestry Vocational School of Samarinda. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 3(1), 314–316.
Google Scholar

*Nainggolan, B. R., & Wirza, Y. (2021). Evaluation of an English textbook: Does English in Mind promote critical thinking skills? Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 546, 51–59.
Google Scholar

Nappi, J. S. (2017). The importance of questioning in developing critical thinking skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30–41.
Google Scholar

Nicholls, J. (2003). Methods in school textbook research. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 3(2), 1–17.
Google Scholar

Nilson, L. B. (2021). Infusing critical thinking into your course: A concrete, practical approach. Stylus Publishing.
Google Scholar

*Olimat, M. (2015). Analyzing action pack textbooks’ questions according to revised Bloom taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 152–159.
Google Scholar

Peterson, S. (2008). Master critical thinking for the SAT. Peterson’s.
Google Scholar

Potter, W. J., & Levine‐Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.
Google Scholar

Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., Bargiela, I. M., & Crujeiras-Pérez, B. (2019). A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 860–869.
Google Scholar

*Rahpeyma, A., & Khoshnood, A. (2015). The analysis of learning objectives in Iranian junior high school English textbooks based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 3(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.3n.2p.44
Google Scholar

*Raqqad, Y. M. A., & Ismail, H. H. (2018). Analyzing the reading questions of AP 12 textbook according to analyzing the reading questions of ap12 textbook according to Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 3(22), 84–94.
Google Scholar

*Razmjoo, S. A., & Kazempourfard, E. (2012). On the representation of Bloom’s revised taxonomy in Interchange course books. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 4(1), 171–204.
Google Scholar

*Riazi, A. M., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian highschool and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. TESL-EJ, 13(4)1–16.
Google Scholar

*Roohani, A., Taheri, F., & Poorzangeneh, M. (2013). Evaluating Four Corners textbooks in terms of cognitive processes using Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 51–67.
Google Scholar

*Roohani, A. (2015). Analyzing cognitive processes and Multiple Intelligences in the nop-notch textbooks. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 2(3), 65–39.
Google Scholar

*Sahragard, R., & Zahed Alavi, S. (2016). Investigating the predominant levels of learning objectives in general English books. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 17(8), 93–114.
Google Scholar

Sanavi, V. R., & Tarighat, S. (2014). Critical thinking and speaking proficiency: A mixed-method study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(1), 79–87.
Google Scholar

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246.
Google Scholar

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
Google Scholar

Shirkhani, S., & Fahim, M. (2011). Enhancing critical thinking in foreign language learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.214
Google Scholar

*Shuyi, N. S., & Renandya, W. A. (2019). An analysis of the cognitive rigour of questions used in secondary school English language textbooks in Singapore. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS), 7, 169–188.
Google Scholar

*Sirait, R. E. S. R. (2014). Comprehension levels of reading exercises in Look Ahead English coursebooks. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(2), 253–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v2i2.6307
Google Scholar

Solihati, N., & Hikmat, A. (2018). Critical thinking tasks manifested in Indonesian language textbooks for senior secondary students. Sage Open, 8(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018802164
Google Scholar

*Sucipto, S., & Cahyo, S. D. (2019). A content analysis of the reading activities in Bright 2 an English textbook for junior high school students. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 13–21.
Google Scholar

*Tabari, M. A., & Tabari, I. A. (2015). Links between Bloom’s taxonomy and Gardener’s Multiple Intelligences: The issue of textbook analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
Google Scholar

*Talebinezhad, M. R., & Matou, Z. (2012). EFL reading comprehension textbooks at university level: A critical thinking perspective. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1746–1754. https://doi.org/doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1746-1754
Google Scholar

*Tangsakul, P., Kijpoonphol, W., Linh, N. D., & Kimura, L. N. (2017). Using Bloom’s revised taxonomy to analyze reading comprehension questions in Team Up in English 1–3 and grade 9 English o-net tests. International Journal of Research-Grantaalayah, 5(7), 31–41.
Google Scholar

*Tayyeh, M. N. (2021). An analysis of reading comprehension questions in English textbook English For Iraq according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(7), 2868–2874.
Google Scholar

Thomson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and social science, 1(9), 1–7.
Google Scholar

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.
Google Scholar

Tomlinson, B., & H. Masuhara (2004). Developing language course materials. RELC Portfolio Series.
Google Scholar

*Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for success 4 reading and writing. The Qualitative Report, 21(9), 1674–1683.
Google Scholar

*Wu, Y., & Pei, Z. (2018). An investigation of critical thinking manifested in the questions of EFL textbooks for tertiary-level English majors of China. American Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.20448/804.3.2.72.84
Google Scholar

Webb, N. L. (2002). Depth of knowledge levels for four content areas [Unpublished manuscript]. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin Madison. Retrieved from http://ossucurr.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/49691156/Norm%20web%20dok%20by%20subject%20area.pdf
Google Scholar

Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251–255.
Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Google Scholar

Yang, Y. T. C., & Gamble, J. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398–412.
Google Scholar

*Zamani, G., & Rezvani, R. (2015). ‘HOTS’ in Iran’s Official Textbooks: Implications for Material Design and Student Learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 138–151.
Google Scholar

*Zareian, G., Davoudi, M., Heshmatifar, Z., & Rahimi, J. (2015). An evaluation of questions in two ESP course books based on Bloom’s new taxonomy of cognitive learning domain. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(8), 313–326.
Google Scholar