A Systematic Review of Second Language Acquisition from the Perspective of Complex Dynamic System Theory
Abstract
From the Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) point of view, second language development has unpredictable and non-linear patterns that vary from learner to learner. Keeping track of such dynamic development requires longitudinal studies with sufficient data points. The present systematic literature review attempts to present an overview on the previously conducted longitudinal studies that have investigated the development of second language subsystems from the CDST perspective. Starting from 1884 publications, the systematic searching strategy led to 45 articles which were examined in order to highlight the state of the art. The observations of the reviewed studies are conclusively supportive of the CDST principles in second language development. The synthesis of the findings of the papers will be presented and, finally, a multitude of suggestions for further research will be provided which can help future studies clarify the existing gaps that exist in the literature.
Keywords
second language development; second language acquisition; CDST; systematic review
References
An, L., Grimm, V., Sullivan, A., Turner II, B., Malleson, N., & Heppenstall, A. et al. (2021). Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems. Ecological Modelling, 457, 109685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109685
Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033
Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2021). Emergence of multiple groups of learners with different writing-development trajectories in classroom: Growth mixture modeling. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100856.
Bak, T. H., Long, M. R., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Sorace, A. (2016). Novelty, challenge, and practice: The impact of intensive language learning on attentional functions. Plos One, 11, e0153485.
Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013). Language policy and planning as an interdisciplinary field: Towards a complexity approach. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3–4), 363–381.
Berggren, R., Nilsson, J., Brehmer, Y., Schmiedek, F., & Lövdén, M. (2020). Foreign language learning in older age does not improve memory or intelligence: Evidence from a randomized controlled study. Psychology and Aging, 35(2), 212–219.
Blommaert, J. (2014). From mobility to complexity in sociolinguistic theory and method. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 103, 1–24.
de Bot, K., & D. Larsen-Freeman (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor et al. (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 5–23). Benjamins.
de Bot, K., W. Lowie, & M. Verspoor (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164.
Casillas, J. V. (2020). The longitudinal development of fine-phonetic detail: Stop production in a domestic immersion program. Language Learning, 70, 768–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12392
Caspi, T., & Lowie, W. M. (2013). The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasiliera de Linguistica, 13(2), 437–462.
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65, 298–325.
Chang, P., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). A CDST perspective on variability in foreign language learners’ listening development. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(601962), 1e14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601962
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47, 80–91.
Ellis, N. C. (2007). Dynamic systems and SLA: The wood and the trees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 23–25.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2009). Constructing another Language—Usage-Based Linguistics in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 335–357. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn037
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar‐based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.
Evans, D. R., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Bifurcations and the emergence of L2 syntactic structures in a complex dynamic system. Front. Psychol. 11, 574603. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574603
Fogal, G. G. (2020). Investigating variability in L2 development: Extending a complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial voice. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 575–600. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz005
Fogal, G. G., & Koyama, D. (2022). A study of co-adaptation through journaling. Journal of Second Language Writing, 55, 100873.
Gui, M., Chen, X., & Verspoor, M. (2021). The dynamics of reading development in L2 English for academic purposes. System, 100, 102546. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102546
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59.
Han, Z. (2021). Usage-based instruction, systems thinking, and the role of Language Mining in second language development. Language Teaching, 54(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000282
Hanania, E. A., & Gradman, H. L. (1977). Acquisition of English structures: A case study of an adult native speaker of Arabic in an English-speaking environment. Language Learning, 27, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00293.x
Hilpert, J. C., & Marchand, G. C. (2018). Complex systems research in educational psychology: Aligning theory and method. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 185–202.
Hiver, P., & Al‐Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741–756.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Evans, R. (2022). Complex dynamic systems theory in language learning: A scoping review of 25 years of research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 913–941.
Holovatch, Y., Kenna, R., Thurner, S. (2017). Complex systems: Physics beyond physics. European Journal of Physics, 38, 023002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa5a87
Huang, T., Steinkrauss, R., & Verspoor, M. (2022). Learning an L2 and L3 at the same time: Help or hinder?. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(4), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1779726
Hult, F. (2010). The complexity turn in educational linguistics. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23, 173–177.
Karr, J. R., Sanghvi, J. C., Macklin, D. N., Gutschow, M. V., Jacobs, J. M., Jr. Bolival, B., Assad-Garcia, N., Glass, J. I., Covert, M. W. (2012). A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell, 150, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044.
Khomeijani Farahani, A. A., Rezaee, A. A., & Moshtaghi Zonouz, R. (2020). Exploring the development of writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency in relation to the motivational trajectories: a dynamically-oriented case study. English Teaching & Learning, 44(1), 81–100.
Kliesch, M., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2021). Cognitive and socioaffective predictors of L2 microdevelopment in late adulthood: A longitudinal intervention study. The Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 237–266.
https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12696
Kowal, I. (2014). Fluency in second language writing: A developmental perspective. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131(2014), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.14.013.2321
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645–671.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1994). On the parallels between chaos theory and second language acquisition [Paper presentation]. Second Language Research Forum, McGill University, Montreal.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development (pp. 11–50). John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Resonances: Second language development and language planning and policy from a complexity theory perspective. In M. Siiner, F. M. Hult, & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Language policy and language acquisition planning (pp. 203–217). Springer.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Lau, N.-.C., & Ploshay, J. J. (2013). Model projections of the changes in atmospheric circulation and surface climate over North America, the North Atlantic, and Europe in the twenty-first century. J. Clim. 26, 9603–9620. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLID-13-00151.1
Lesonen, S., Steinkrauss, R., Suni, M., & Verspoor, M. (2021). Dynamic usage-based principles in the development of L2 Finnish evaluative constructions. Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 442–472.
Lewars, E. G. (2011). Computational chemistry: Introduction to the theory and applications of molecular and quantum mechanics. Springer.
Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2009). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 85–102.
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883.
Lowie, W. M., Caspi, T., Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2011). Modeling development and change. In M. H. Verspoor, K. De Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 22–122). Benjamins.
Lowie, W. M., Van Dijk, M., Chan, H. P., & Verspoor, M. H. (2017). Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7, 127–148. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.7
Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2019). Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning, 69, 184–206. https://doi:10.1111/lang.12324
Lowie, W. M., Verspoor, M. H., & de Bot, K. (2010). A dynamic view of second language development across the lifespan. In K. de Bot & R. W. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 125–146). Routledge.
Mellow, J. D. (2008). The emergence of complex syntax: A longitudinal case study of the ESL development of dependency resolution. Lingua, 118(4), 499–521.
Menke, M. R., & Strawbridge, T. (2019). The writing of Spanish majors: A longitudinal analysis of syntactic complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100665
Mercer, S. (2011). Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39(3), 335–346.
Mufwene, S. S., Coupé, C., & Pellegrino, F. (Eds.) (2017). Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2015). Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal L2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 374–404). Multilingual Matters.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2018). Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 279–309). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. Motivational dynamics in language learning, 81, 164–194. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-015
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
Pfenninger, S. E. (2022). Emergent bilinguals in a digital world: A dynamic analysis of longterm L2 development in (pre)primary school children. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(1), 41–66.
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207.
Ramos, S., García, Y. F., Antón, E., Casaponsa, A., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2017). Does learning a language in the elderly enhance switching ability?. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 39–48.
Rokoszewska, K. J. (2020). Intra-individual Variability in the Emergence of Lexical Complexity in Speaking English at Secondary School. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 6(1), 107–142.
Rokoszewska, K. (2022). The dynamics of monthly growth rates in the emergence of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 English writing at secondary school–a learner corpus analysis. System, 106, 102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102775
Rosmawati, R. (2014). Dynamic development of complexity and accuracy: a case study in second language academic writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.37.2.01ros
Routarinne, S., & Ahlholm, M. (2021). Developing requests in multilingual classroom interaction: A case of second language development in middle childhood. Applied Linguistics, 42(4), 765–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa048
Sauer, L., & Ellis, R. (2019). The social lives of adolescent study abroad learners and their L2 development. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12589
Schlüter, M., Baeza, A., Dressler, G., Frank, K., Groeneveld, J., Jager, W., Janssen, M. A., McAllister, R. R. J., Müller, B., Orach, K., Schwarz, N., Wijermans, N. (2017). A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of socialecological systems. Ecol. Econ. 131, 21–35.
Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring the dynamic long‐term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 369–390.
Shanker, S. G., & King, B. J. (2002). The emergence of a new paradigm in ape language research. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 25(5), 605–620.
Skiba, R., & Dittmar, N. (1992). Pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic constraints and grammaticalization: A longitudinal perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(3), 323–349.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq001
Serrano, R., & Howard, E. (2007). Second language writing development in English and in Spanish in a two-way immersion programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(2), 152–170.
Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W. M. (2011). Variability analyses in language development. In A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). John Benjamins Publishers.
Van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340–374.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H., & Vahtrick, L. (2017). Linguistic complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches en didactique des langues et des culture. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1450
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Wieling, M. (2021). L2 developmental measures from a dynamic perspective. In B. Le Bruyn & M. Paquot (Eds.), Learner corpus research meets second language acquisition (pp. 172–190). Cambridge University Press.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231. https://doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. John Benjamins.
Verspoor, M., & van Dijk, M. (2011). Visualizing interaction between variables. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development (pp. 85–98). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Verspoor, M. & van Dijk, M. (2012). Variability in a dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. In C. Chapel (Ed.), The Wiley- Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.
Vyatkina, N. (2012). The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01401.x
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H., & Golcher, F. (2015). Syntactic modification at early stages of L2 German writing development: A longitudinal learner corpus study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 28–50.
Wind, A. M. (2021). Nonlinearity and inter-and intra-individual variability in the extent of engagement in self-reflection and its role in second language writing: A multiple-case study. System, 103, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102672
Wong, P. C., Ou, J., Pang, C. W., Zhang, L., Tse, C. S., Lam, L. C., & Antoniou, M. (2019). Language training leads to global cognitive improvement in older adults: A preliminary study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(7), 2411–2424.
Yu, H., & Lowie, W. (2020). Dynamic paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: A longitudinal case study of Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz040
Zhang, Y. (2004). Processing constraints, categorial analysis, and the second language acquisition of the Chinese adjective suffix‐de (ADJ). Language Learning, 54(3), 437–468.
Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2013). Variability in Chinese as a foreign language learners’ development of the Chinese numeral classifier system. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 46–60.
Zhang, S., Zhang, H., & Zhang, C. (2022). A Dynamic Systems study on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in English writing development by Chinese university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 787710.
Zheng, Y. (2016). The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English. System, 56, 40–53.
Texas State University United States
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
