Abdelmalak, M. M. M., & Parra, J. L. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 6(4), 19–37.
Google Scholar

Alexander, M. M., Lynch, J. E., Rabinovich, T., & Knutel, P. G. (2014). Snapshot of a hybrid learning environment. The Quarterly Review of Distance Learning, 15(1), 9–21.
Google Scholar

Annamalai, N., & Kumar, J., A. (2020). Understanding smartphone use behavior among distance education students in completing their coursework in English: A mixed-method approach. The Reference Librarian, 61(3–4), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2020.1815630
Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2012). HyFlex course design: The advantages of letting students choose the blend. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Sloan Consortium Blended Learning Conference & Workshop. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5466-0.ch015
Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2009). Student self-reflections on learning in a hybrid course environment: Do participation mode differences lead to differences in reflections? Peer-reviewed paper presented at the Association for Educational Communication and Technology International Conference, Louisville KY.
Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible course design (1st ed.). EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
Google Scholar

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.007
Google Scholar

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Cheung, S., Kwok, L., Phusa, K., & Yang, H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1
Google Scholar

Detienne, L., Raes, A., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Benefits, challenges and design guidelines for synchronous hybrid learning: A systematic literature review. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), AACE. Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 2004–2009. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184440/
Google Scholar

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Google Scholar

Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Thompson, J., Kramer, L., DeCantis, G., & Hermsdorfer, A. (2015). Student satisfaction with online learning: Is it a psychological contract? Online Learning,19(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.496
Google Scholar

Gobeil-Proulx, J. (2019). La perspective étudiante sur la formation comodale, ou hybride flexible [What do university students think about hybrid-flexible, or HyFlex courses?] Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 16(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n1-04
Google Scholar

Harun, F., & Hussin, S. (2018). Speak through your mobile app changing the game: English language in education 4.0. In Proceedings of the 27th Melta International Conference, Johor Bharu, Malaysia, 186–196.
Google Scholar

He, W., Gajski, D., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Implementing flexible hybrid instruction in an electrical engineering course: The best of three worlds? Computers & Education, 81, 59–68.
Google Scholar

Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454.
Google Scholar

Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovik, V. (2019). The discourse on learning styles in online education. 27th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR48224.2019.8971204
Google Scholar

Klimova, B., F., & Kacetla, J. (2015). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 182, 477–481.
Google Scholar

Koskinen, M. (2018). Understanding the needs of adult graduate students: An exploratory case study of a Hyfex learning environment. Doctoral thesis, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/fles/neu:m044c738v/fulltext.pdf
Google Scholar

Leijon, M., & Lundgren, B. (2019). Connecting physical and virtual spaces in a HyFlex pedagogic model with a focus on teacher interaction. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(1). Retrieved from https://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1640/1338
Google Scholar

Lockman, A. S., & Schirmer B., R. (2020). Online instruction in higher hducation: Promising, research-based, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 130–152.
Google Scholar

Love, S. (2015). A quantitative inquiry into first generation students’ readiness for distance education. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Ann Arbor, MI, 2015.
Google Scholar

Malczyk, B. R., & Mollenkopf, D. (2019). Student-centered blended Learning: The HyFlex approach to blended Learning. Innovation in Pedagogy and Technology Symposium, 2019 (Selected Conference Proceedings), 86–87.
Google Scholar

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159/104009. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.compedu.2020.104009
Google Scholar

McBride, K., & Fägersten, K. B. (2008). Student’s role in distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 43–66). CALICO.
Google Scholar

Miller, J., B., Risser, M., D., & Griffiths, R., P. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 1(1), 8–23.
Google Scholar

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17
Google Scholar

Parra, J., L., & Abdelmalak, M. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(4), 19–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100102
Google Scholar

Pinchot, J., & Paullet, K. (2014). Different keystrokes for different folks: Addressing learning styles. Online Education Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 12(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?d=EJ1140787
Google Scholar

Qayyum, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (Eds.) (2019). Open and Distance Education in Asia, Africa and the Middle East National Perspectives in a Digital Age. Springer Open Singapore. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23272
Google Scholar

Raes, A., et al. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269–290. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Google Scholar

Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
Google Scholar

Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M., M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14, 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
Google Scholar

Reynard, R. (2007). Hybrid learning: Challenges for teachers. T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2007/05/17/
Google Scholar

Riel, J., Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2016). Listening to the teachers: Using weekly online teacher logs for ROPD to identify teachers’ persistent challenges when implementing a blended learning curriculum. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(2), 169–200.
Google Scholar

Robertson, B., & Kelly, K. (2013). Operating a very large-section, hybrid principles of marketing class at a public university: Lessons learned over ten years. Atlantic Marketing Journal, 2(3), Article 10. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/-jVE
Google Scholar

Romero-Hall, E., & Ripine, C. (2021). Hybrid flexible instruction: Exploring faculty preparedness. Online Learning, 25(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2426
Google Scholar

Serdyukov, P., & Hill, R. A. (2013). Flying with clipped wings: Are students independent in online college classes? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 6(1), 53–65.
Google Scholar

SFSU Academic Senate Policy S16–264, 2010. Retrieved from https://senate.sfsu.edu/policy/online-education-policy-1
Google Scholar

Shek, D. T. L., Zhu, X., Li, X., & Dou, Diya. (2022). Satisfaction with HyFlex teaching and law-abiding leadership education in Hong Kong University students under COVID-19. Applied Research Quality Life, 17, 2833–2858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10040-4
Google Scholar

Singh, J., & Matthees B. (2021). Facilitating interprofessional education in an online environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method study. Healthcare, 9(5), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9050567
Google Scholar

Smith, D., & Hardaker G. (2000). E-Learning innovation through the implementation of an internet supported learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 1–16.
Google Scholar

Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. M. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Google Scholar

Verrecchia, P., J., & McGlinchey, M. J. (2021). Teaching during Covid: The effectiveness of the HyFlex classroom in a 300 level statistics class. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 9(3), 23–27. Redfame publishing. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/jetsjl/v9y2021i3p23-27.html
Google Scholar

Ying, C., L., J., Embi, M., A., & Hashim, H. (2019). Students’ perceptions toward gamification in ESL classroom: KAHOOT! In Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Teaching, Assessment and Research in the English Language, Melaka, Malaysia, 129–132.
Google Scholar

Zając, M. (2020). Kursy typu HyFlex – możliwości i wyzwania. e-mentor. Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/blog/wpis/id/99
Google Scholar

Zydney, J. M., McKimm, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Here or there instruction: Lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. TechTrends, 63, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
Google Scholar