Factors Causing Overpassivisation of Unaccusative Verbs by Japanese Learners of English
Abstract
It has been reported that second language (L2) learners of English including Japanese learners of English (JLEs) overpassivise unaccusative verbs although it is a kind of intransitive verbs. In order to account for the phenomenon, several assumptions have been proposed. However, so far, it is unclear which assumption is the most effective for explaining the overpassivisation of unaccusatives. Thus, this study tries to examine which of the three factors, animacy of subjects, existence of conceptualizable agents, or telicity of verbs, the most strongly affects overpassivisation of unaccusative verbs by JLEs. In this study, we conducted two experiments to examine this question. Study 1 was conducted with 100 university JLEs to compare the effect of animacy of subjects with that of the existence of conceptualizable agents. As a result, it was found that the animacy of subjects more strongly affected the overpassivisation of unaccusatives than the existence of conceptualizable agents. We conducted Study 2 with 101 university JLEs to examine which of the two factors, the existence of conceptualizable agents or the degree of telicity, is more influential. The results showed that the former was influential, but the latter was less so on the overpassivisation of unaccusatives. From the results of the two experiments, we concluded that the animacy of subject is the strongest influential factor among the three. On the other hand, the telicity of verbs hardly influences any errors.
Keywords
overpassivisation; unaccusative verbs; animacy; conceptualizable agents; telicity
References
Balcom, P. (1997). Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research, 13, 1–9.
Hirakawa, M. (1995). L2 acquisition of English unaccusative construction. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 291–302). Cascadilla Press.
Hirakawa, M. (2006). ‘Passive’ unaccusative errors in L2 English revised. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prevost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development. John Benjamins.
Ju, M. K. (2000). Overpassivization errors by second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 85–111.
Kondo, T. (2009). Argument Structure Morphosyntactic Links in the Second Language English of Adult Speakers (Doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, UK.
Kondo, T. (2019). The acquisition of intransitive verbs by second language learners. In T. Shirahata & K. Suda (Eds.), Application of language acquisition research (Monograph series 3 for second language research) (pp. 31–68). Kuroshio Publishers (in Japanese).
Kondo, T., & Shirahata, T. (2015). The effects of explicit instruction on intransitive verb structures in L2 English classrooms. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan (ARELE), 26, 93–108.
Kondo, T., & Shirahata, T. (2018). Explicit instruction on English verb structures in L2 classrooms. In I. Walker, D. K. G. Chan, M. Nagami, & C. Bourguignon (Eds.), New perspectives on the development of key competencies in foreign language education (pp. 157–179). Mouton De Gruyter.
Kondo, T., Otaki, A., Suda, K., & Shirahata, T. (2015a, June). Japanese learners’ usage of be + -en Form with English unaccusative verbs. Talk at the Japan Second Language Association 15th Annual Conference. Hiroshima University, Japan.
Kondo, T., Otaki, A., Suda, K., & Shirahata, T. (2015b, July). Animate and inanimate contrast in the acquisition of unaccusative verbs. Talk at the 17th Annual International Conference the Japanese Society for Language Science. Beppu City, Japan.
Kondo, T., Otaki, A., Suda, K., & Shirahata, T. (2016). Occurrences of unaccusative verbs in English textbooks and their acquisition. Journal of the CELES, 45, 53–60.
Kondo, T., Shirahata, T., Suda, K., Ogawa, M., & Yokota, H. (2020). Effects of explicit instruction on intransitive and transitive verbs in second language English: with a special focus on non-instructed verbs, Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan (ARELE), 31, 81–96.
Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity alternations in L2 Acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 229–273.
Montrul, S. (2001). First -language-constrained variability in the second language acquisition of argument-structure-changing morphology with causative verbs. Second Language Research, 17, 144–194.
Oshita, H. (1997). “The accusative trap”: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs (Doctoral dissertation) University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus-study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research, 16, 293–324.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. UC Berkeley. pp. 157–189.
Sato, K. (2015). Why does overpassivisation of unaccusative verbs happen?—focus on *An accident was happened. Keisuisya (in Japanese).
Shirahata, T., Kondo, T., Suda, K., Otaki, A., Ogawa, M., & Yokota, H. (2019). The learning and teaching of inanimate subjects: The case of Japanese learners of English, Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan (ARELE), 30, 1–16.
Shirahata, T., Kondo, T., Ogawa, M., Suda., K., Yokota, H. & Otaki, A. (2020). A study of overpassivisation of English unaccusatives by Japanese learners of English. In T. Shirahata & K. Suda (Eds.), The spillover effect of second language acquisition research—from core grammar to L2 utterance (Monograph series 4 for second language research) (pp. 31–55). Kuroshio Publishers (in Japanese).
Sorace, A. (2000). Gradients in auxiliary selection with Intransitive Verbs. Language, 76, 859–890.
Szcześniak, K. (2022). Memory of formulaic sequences in L2 retention of chunks featuring inchoative uses of unaccusative verbs. LINGUISTICA SILESIANA, 43, 43–64.
Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English. John Benjamins.
Yusa, N. (2003). ‘Passive’ Unaccusatives in L2 Acquisition. In P. M. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 11 (pp. 246–259). CLSI.
Zobl, H. (1989). Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203–221). Cambridge University Press.
Shizuoka University Japan
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6564
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
