Amengual-Pizarro, M. (2018). Foreign language classroom anxiety among English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 145–159.
Google Scholar
Akiyama, Y. (2017). Vicious vs. virtuous cycles of turn negotiation in American-Japanese telecollaboration: Is silence a virtue? Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(2), 190–209.
Google Scholar
Altunel, I. (2021). Insights into EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in online English classes during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study from Turkey. Language and Technology, 3(1), 13–20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1666143
Google Scholar
Antoniadou, V. (2011). Using Activity Theory to understand the contradictions in an online transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a foreign language ReCALL, 23(3), 233–251.
Google Scholar
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60–81.
Google Scholar
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing project-based learning. Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. International Society for Technology in Education.
Google Scholar
Buss, A. B. (1980). Self-consciousness and social anxiety. Freeman.
Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Research designs. Vol. 2 (pp. 57–71). The American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar
Chun, D., & Turula, A. (2015). Cognitive and social presence in task-based telecollaboration [Conference session]. In J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, M. Oberhofer, & G. C. Plana (Eds.), Task Design & CALL. Proceedings. Universiteit Antwerpen.
Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar
Crozier, W. R. (1997). Individual learners: Personality differences in education. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Crozier, W. R. (2005). Shyness and students’ perceptions of seminars. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 4(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2004.4.1.27
Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 22–51.
Google Scholar
Dooly, M. (2010). Teacher 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0. language literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 277–304). Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. In C. C. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 169–183). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2016). “Are you able to access this website at all?”—Team negotiations and micro-level challenges in telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1152–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1167091
Google Scholar
Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent culture of language: The CULTURA project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102.
Google Scholar
Gabryś-Barker, D. (2012). Reflectivity in pre-service teacher education. A survey of theory and practice. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940.
Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 8–28. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44691
Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2020). Building the porous classroom: An expanded model for blended language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44731
Google Scholar
Guichon, N., & Hauck, M. (2011). Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in Demand than Ever. ReCALL, 23(3), 187–199.
Google Scholar
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0. Language literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2012). Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal, 66(1), 42–51.
Google Scholar
Guth, S., & Thomas, M. (2010). Telecollaboration with web 2.0 tools. In S. Guth & F. Helm, (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0. Language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 39–68). Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.
Google Scholar
Hartwell, M., & Zou, B. (2013). A Chinese-French case study of English language learning via Wikispaces, Animoto and Skype [Conference session]. In I. Bradley & S. Thouesny (Eds.), 20 Years of EUROCALL: Learning from the past, looking to the future. Evora, Portugal (pp. 106–111). EUROCALL.
Google Scholar
Hauck, M., & Warnecke, S. (2013). Materials design in CALL: Social presence in online environments. In M. Thomas, R. Hayo, & M. Warschauer, Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 95–115). Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Helm, F. (2015). The practises and challenges of Telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning and Technology, 19(2), 197–217.
Google Scholar
Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2010). The Multifarious Goals of Telecollaboration 2.0. Theoretical and Practical Implications. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0. language literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 69–106). Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., & Bañados E. (2010). An international video-web communication project between Chile and The Netherlands. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0 language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21sth century (pp. 427–436). Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Cooperation and the use of technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Mreeriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–423). Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Putting it into practice. Paul Chapman Publishing.
Google Scholar
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), article 43.
Google Scholar
King, J. E. (2013). Silence in the second language classroom of Japanese universities. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 325–434.
Google Scholar
Kohn, K., & Hoffstaedter, P. (2017). Learner agency and non-native speaker identity in pedagogical lingua franca conversations: Insights from intercultural telecollaboration in foreign language education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1), 1–17.
Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalisation. Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311.
Google Scholar
Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning. Guiding deeper inquiry. Corwin.
Google Scholar
Lamy, M.-N., & Goodfellow, R. (2010). Telecollaboration and learning 2.0. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0. language literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Lan, Y. J. (2020). Immersion, interaction, and experience-oriented learning: Bringing virtual reality into FL learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–15. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44704
Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Google Scholar
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2020). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831408
Google Scholar
Luchikhina, L., & Elfimova N. (2019). Telecollaborative project as a method of intercultural communicative competence development in a non-linguistic university (pp. 472–476). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Vol. 333. Atlanta Press.
Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clement, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
Google Scholar
Mandasari, B., & Aminatun, D. (2020). Improving students’ speaking performance through vlog. English Educational Journal of English Teaching and Research, 5(2), 136–142.
Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (2012). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Nokes-Malach, T., Zepeda, C., Richey, J., & Gadgil, S. (2019). Collaborative learning: The benefits and costs. In J. Dunlosky & K. Rawson (Eds.), The cognitive handbook of cognition and education. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology (pp. 500–527). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2012). Intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 340–356). Routledge.
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2015). Supporting in-service language educators in learning to telecollaborate. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 64–83. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/odowd.pdf
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2016). Emerging trends and new directions in telecollaborative learning. CALICO Journal, 33(3), 291–310.
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2017). Exploring the impact of telecollaboration in initial teacher education: The EVALUATE project. The EUROCALL Review, 25(2), 38–41.
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Eberbach, K. (2004). Guides on the side? Task and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects. ReCALL, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004000217
Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: Stage-of-the-art and the role of UNIcollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1(23). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B. (2007). Models of telecollaboration (1): eTandem. In O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 41–61). Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar
Pfingsthorn, J., Kramer, C., Czura, A., & Stefl, M. (2019). The formation of professional identity and motivation to engage it telecollaboration in foreign language education. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 143–165. Liverpool University Press.
Google Scholar
Rążewska, A. (2022). Developing group work and peer cooperation through telecollaboration. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Pedagogical University of Cracow.
Google Scholar
Richards, J., C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Rockwood, H. S. (1995). Cooperative and collaborative learning. National Learning Forum, 4(6), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.10024
Google Scholar
Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2012). Examining pre-service teacher competence in lesson planning pertaining to collaborative learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 349–379.
Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Shea, D. P. (2017). Compelled to speak: Addressing student reticence in a university EFL classroom. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 173–184.
Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158.
Google Scholar
Taskiran, A. (2019). Telecollaboration: Fostering foreign language learning at a distance. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(2), 87–97.
Google Scholar
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
Google Scholar
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revised. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404
Google Scholar
Turula, A., & Raith, T. (2015). Telecollaboration insights: Learning from exchanges that fail. The EUROCALL Review, 23(2), 19–37.
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). L.S. Vygotsky: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Ware, P. (2018). Telecollaboration. In J. I. Liontas & M. DelliCarpini (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar
Yang, S. J (2020). Affordances and challenges of telecollaboration for pre-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 30–41. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44733
Google Scholar
Zarrinabadi, N., & Pawlak, M. (2021). New perspectives on willingness to communicate in a second language. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67634-6
Google Scholar