Alcón-Soler, E. (2018). Effects of task-supported language teaching on learners’ use and knowledge of email request mitigators. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 55–81). John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Alyousef, H. S. (2015). An investigation of metadiscourse features in international postgraduate business students’ texts: The use of interactive and interactional markers in tertiary multimodal finance texts. SAGE Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015590647
Google Scholar
Asadi, A. (2018). Enhancing writing skills of English learners through metadiscourse. MexTESOL Journal, 11(2), 1–13.
Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
Google Scholar
Cheng, A., & Tsang, A. (2022). Use and understanding of connectives: An embedded case study of ESL learners of different proficiency levels. Language Awareness, 31(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1871912
Google Scholar
Chiang, S. Y. (2003). The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning. System, 31(4), 471–484.
Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
Google Scholar
Cutting, J., Fordyce, K. (2021). Pragmatics. 4th edition. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Darwish, H. (2019). Writer-reader interaction: Writer’s stance in English L1 and L2. A doctoral thesis at the University of Bedfordshire. Retrieved from https://uobrep.openrepository.com/uobrep/bitstream/10547/623581/1/DARWISH_REPOSITORY+VERSION.pdf
Google Scholar
Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33(4), 623–636.
Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between TBLT and ISLA. Journal on task-based language teaching, 1(1), 47–70.
Google Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley.
Google Scholar
Long, M., & Ahmadian, M. J. (2022). Preface. The origins and growth of task-based language teaching. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. xxv–xxxii). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lotfi, S. A. T., Sarkeshikian, S. A. H., & Saleh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the use of metadiscourse markers in argumentative essays by Iranian and Chinese EFL students. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1645227
Google Scholar
Lu, Y. (2019). The acquisition of Chinese connectives by second language learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa]. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.yzx6jies
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. H., & Pham, M. T. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.010
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M., & Le, V. C. (2019). Teaching pragmatics in EFL classrooms. Jakarta: The Association for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia (TEFLIN).
Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2020). Introducing pragmatics in use. 2nd edition. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2022). Psychology of learning versus acquisition. In: T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching (pp. 406–418). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 287–307). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ren, W., Li, S., & Lü, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics instruction. Applied Linguistics, XX/XX, 1–21.
Google Scholar
Roever, C. (2022). Teaching and testing second language pragmatics in interaction. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Sarani, A., & Talati-Baghsiahi, A. (2017). Explicit instruction of pragmatic features: Its impact on EFL learners’ knowledge of hedging devices in academic writing. Issues in Language Teaching, 6(1), 29–53.
Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Shahriari, H., & Shadloo, F. (2019). Interaction in argumentative essays: The case of engagement. Discourse and Interaction, 12(1), 96–110.
Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2019). Foreword: New frontiers in task-based language teaching research. In J. Ahmadian & M. García Mayo (Eds.), Recent Perspectives on TaskBased Language Learning and Teaching (pp. vii–xxi). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503399
Google Scholar
Spada, N. M., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. An overview. In: N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2022). How to teach an additional language. To task or not to task? Amsterdam/ Philadpelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1979). Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 447–456.
Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (2012). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Longman.
Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
Google Scholar
Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 18(2), 95–123.
Google Scholar
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31–48.
Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 31(1), 61–95.
Google Scholar