Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Chang, F. (2012). The roles of verb semantics, entrenchment, and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Language, 88(1), 45-81.
Google Scholar

Ambridge, B., & Brandt, S. (2013). Lisa filled water into the cup: The roles of entrenchment, pre-emption and verb semantics in German speakers’ L2 acquisition of English locatives. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 61(3), 245-263.
Google Scholar

Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Freudenthal, D., & Chang, F. (2014). Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics or both?. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 218-243.
Google Scholar

Chaudron, C. (2003). Data collection in SLA research. The handbook of second language acquisition, 762-828.
Google Scholar

Colleman, T. (2010). The benefactive semantic potential of ‘caused reception’constructions. Benefactives and malefactives: typological perspectives and case studies, 92, 219.
Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series 4, 49-68.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13: 327–356.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford University Press
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (2010). Verbs, constructions and semantic frames. Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure, 39-58.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (2011). Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 131-153.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, A., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. in Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 197-215. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 182-200.
Google Scholar

Gropen J, Pinker S, Hollander M, Goldberg R, and Wilson R (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 203–257.
Google Scholar

Chung, T. T. R., & Gordon, P. (1998). The acquisition of Chinese dative constructions. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 22, pp. 109-120).
Google Scholar

Gruber, J. S. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar

Hovav, M. R., & Levin, B. (2008). The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44(01), 129-167.
Google Scholar

Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese Learners’ Acquisition of the Narrow Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English. Language Learning, 47(4), 637-669.
Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1992). Semantic structures. MIT press.
Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1997). Twistin'the night away. Language, 534-559.
Google Scholar

Krifka, M. (1999, April). Manner in dative alternation. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Vol. 18, pp. 260-271).
Google Scholar

Krifka, M. (2004). Semantic and pragmatic conditions for the dative alternation. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 4(2004), 1-32.
Google Scholar

Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Levin, B. (2004). Verbs and constructions: Where next. In Western Conference on Linguistics, University of Southern California (Vol. 13).
Google Scholar

Levin, B. (2008). Dative verbs: A crosslinguistic perspective. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 31(2), 285-312.
Google Scholar

Li, C.N. & Thompson, S.A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Li, P., Zhang, F., Tsai, E., Puls, B. (2013). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, DOI: 10.1017/S1366728913000606
Google Scholar

Liu, F. H. (2006). Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 863-904.
Google Scholar

Liu, F. H. (2007). Word order variation and ba sentences in Chinese. Studies in language, 31(3), 649-682.
Google Scholar

Marantz, A. (1993). Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Constructions. In S. Mehombo (cd.). 113-151.
Google Scholar

Mazurkewich, I., & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16(3), 261-283.
Google Scholar

McDonough, K., & Nekrasova-Beckern, T. (2012). Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1-24.
Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1996). Issues in second language acquisition research: Examining substance and procedure. Handbook of second language acquisition, 2, 349-374.
Google Scholar

Oehrle, R. T. (1976). The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Google Scholar

Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26(3), 407-439.
Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments (Vol. 49). MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Shimanskaya, E., & Dekydtspotter, L. (2012) French Adversative Dative Clitics in L2 Acquisition: The Search for a Semantic Role.
Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. Handbook of second language acquisition, 375-409.
Google Scholar

Tang, T. C. (1979). Double object constructions in Mandarin. Guoyu Yufa Yanjiu Lunji [Studies in Chinese Syntax], 363-389.
Google Scholar

Taylor, J. R. (2008). Prototypes in cognitive linguistics. In Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge.
Google Scholar

van der Leek, F. C. (1996). Rigid syntax and flexible meaning: The case of the English ditransitive. Conceptual structure. Discourse and Language, 321-332.
Google Scholar

White, L. (1987). Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(03), 261-285.
Google Scholar

Xu, D. (1996). Initiation à la syntaxe chinoise. Paris: l'Asiatheque.
Google Scholar

Yao, Y., & Liu, F. H. (2010, August). A working report on statistically modeling dative variation in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1236-1244). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Google Scholar

Yu, X.Y. (2013). An experimental study on dative alternation in Mandarin Chinese. Presentation at the 25th NACCL, University of Michigan, proceedings in press.
Google Scholar

Yook, C. (2013). The Role of Frequency in Korean Learners' Acquisition of English Dative Construction. English Teaching, 68(1).
Google Scholar