Syntactical Modifications in Teacher Talk of Native and Non-Native Speakers in EFL Classrooms
Abstract
Classroom language in EFL classrooms comprises the core of communication between teachers and learners. Teacher talk plays a central role in understanding the nature of classroom language in this respect. According to Krashen input hypothesis, teacher talk also constitutes an important source of comprehensible input for the language acquisition of the learner (Krashen, 1981). To make the input comprehensible, teachers may make modifications in their vocabulary, syntax, rate of speech or discourse. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to discover whether native speakers of English and non-native speakers of English make any syntactical modifications in their teacher talk at elementary and pre-intermediate levels and to try to find out what kind of syntactical modifications they make if they modify their syntax during their speech. The study was carried out with eight EFL instructors (both NSs and NNSs) at Çağ University in Turkey using their audio-recordings, a questionnaire and interviews. Antconc 3.2.1 Programme and SPSS 17.0 Programme were used to analyse the quantitative data. The findings of the data were incorporated with the results of interviews forming the qualitative part of the study. The results of the data revealed that native speakers of English and non-native speakers of English made syntactical modifications in their teacher talk at elementary and pre-intermediate levels. They ranged from subordinate clauses to the types of sentences. The findings of the study also demonstrated that syntactical modifications in the teacher talk of native speakers and non-native speakers at both levels depended on the proficiency level of the learners although not all of these modifications formed a statistically meaningful difference.Keywords
English as a Foreign Language; Teacher Talk; Syntactical Modifications; Comprehensible Input
References
Chaudron, C. (1979). Complexity of teacher speech and vocabulary explanation/ elaboration. In the 13th Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT journal, 52(3), 179-187.
Doughty, C.J., & Long, M.H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing Learner Language Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaies, S.J. (1976). Sentence combining: A technique for assessing proficiency in a second language. Paper presented at the Conference on Perspectives on Language, University of Louisville, Louisville.
Gaies, S. J. (1977). The nature of linguistic input in formal second language learning: linguistic and communicative strategies in ESL teachers’ classroom language. On Tesol, 77, 204-212.
Gaies, S. J. (1983). The investigation of language classroom processes. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 207.
Hákansson, G. (1986). Quantitative studies of teacher talk. In G. Kasper (Eds.), Learning, Teaching and Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom, 83-98.
Hatch, E. M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A Second Language Perspective. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, MA 01969, 64.
Henzl, V. (1973). Linguistic register of foreign language instruction. Language Learning, 23(2), 207-222.
Henzl, V. (1979). Foreigner talk in the classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 17/2, 159-165.
Ishiguro, T. (1986). Simplification and elaboration in foreign language teacher talk and its source. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 21-64.
Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman, 2.
Pica, T., & Long, M. H. (1986). The linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, 85-98. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the second language classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wesche, M. B., & Ready, D. (1985). Foreigner talk in the university classroom. Input in Second Language Acquisition, 89-114.
Wright, T. (2005). Classroom management in language education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Xiao-Yan, M. (2006). Teacher Talk and EFL in University Classrooms. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chongqing Normal University & Yangtze Normal University, China, 5-13.
Xu, X. H. (2010). Analysis of teacher talk on the basis of relevance theory. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 45-50
Toros University, Mersin Turkey
Çukurova University, Adana Turkey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
