Influence of Background Knowledge and Language Proficiency on Comprehension of Domain-Specific Texts by University Students
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study that explores two factors contributing to reading comprehension of domain specific texts, namely level of language proficiency and background knowledge. Overall, 32 students participated in the study by taking two custom-designed reading comprehension tests. The test scores were further analyzed using SPSS statistical software. The results of statistical tests revealed the differences between study groups as well as the effects of compensation. More precisely, the most proficient group scored higher on almost all tests and completed the tests more quickly than the remaining groups. The statistical tools used to test the data showed that there are significant differences between all the groups in their performance on Proficiency Level Test and in timing. Hence, our hypothesis concerning the influence of background knowledge and language proficiency on reading comprehension of domain-specific texts has been confirmed. Finally, the paper discusses limitations of the study as well as implications for EFL teaching.
Keywords
reading comprehension; background knowledge; language proficiency; domain-specific texts
References
Bernhardt, E. B., 1996, Reading development in a second language: Theoretical empirical, and classroom perspectives, Alex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
Carrel, P. L., 1983, Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clark, M. J., & Silberstein, S., 1977, Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class, [w:] «Language Learning», 27(1), s. 135-154.
Coady, J., 1979, A psycholinguistic model of ESL reader, [w:] «Reading in a second language», R. Mackay, B. Barkman & R. R. Jordan (red.), Newbury House Publishers, Rowley, Massachusetts, s. 5-12.
Erten, I. H., & Razi, S., 2009, The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension, [w:] «Reading in a Foreign Language», 21(1), s. 60-77.
Goodman, K., 1971, Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process, [w:] «The psychology of second language learning», P. Pimskeur & T. Quinn (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 135-142.
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L., 1996, Some observations on the simple view of reading, [w:] «Reading comprehension difficulties», Cornoldi C., Oakhill J. (red.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, s. 1-13.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L., 2002, Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education, Edinburgh.
Joag-Dev, Ch., & Steffensen, M. S., 1995, Cultural knowledge and reading, [w:] «Reading in a foreign language», J. Ch. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (red.), Longman, New York, s. 48-64.
Keshavarz, M. H., & Atai, M. R., 2007, Content schema, linguistic simplification, and EFL readers’ comprehension and recall, [w:] «Reading in a Foreign Language», 19(1), s. 19-33.
Norris-Holt, J., 2001, Motivation as a contributing factor in second language acquisition, [w:] «The Internet TESL Journal», 7(6), artykuł w Internecie, adres: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Norris-Motivation.html.
Piasecka, L., 2008, Psycholinguistic and socio-cultural perspectives on native and foreign language reading. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole.
Richgels, D. J., 1982, Schema theory and representations of reading comprehension, [w:] «The Journal of Education Research», 76(1), s. 54-62.
Ridgway, T., 1997, Thresholds of the background knowledge effect in foreign language reading, [w:] «Reading in a Foreign Language», 11(1), s. 151-168.
Saville-Troike, M., 2006, Introducing Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Singhal, M., 1998, A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schemata, [w:] «The Internet TESL Journal», 4(10), artykuł w Internecie, adres: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-ReadingL1L2.htm.
Sousa, D. A., 2014, How the brain learns to read. 2nd ed., Sage Publications, New York.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J., 1998, Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice, Longman, New York.
Yin, K. M., 1985, The role of prior knowledge in reading comprehension, [w:] «Reading in a Foreign Language», 3(1), s. 375-380.
University of Opole Poland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
