Metaphors We Academicize the World with?
Metaphor(icity) Perceived in the Context of Academia (a Case Study of English Philologists-to-be)
Abstract
Since the advent of Cognitive Linguistics in the 20th century (cf. Lakoff & Johnson, 1980/2003), the role and perception of metaphor(isation) started to change, not only among theoretical linguists and researchers, but also in the context of Applied Linguistics. Thus, no longer treated as a mere ornament or anomaly, metaphor has been more and more appreciated by educationalists, course book writers, and teachers, but also by psychologists, clinicians, and other professionals. In short, it has become an educational and a diagnostic tool in many ‘applied’ areas of human development.
In line with this rekindled interest in metaphoricity, in my study I attempt to learn more about awareness and perception of metaphoric conceptualisations among English philology university students (both freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors) in the environment of academia, an environment they naturally function in and belong to.
My preliminary assumption is that despite the already widely acknowledged importance of metaphors in sciences and humanities (cf. Cameron and Maslen 2010, Haase 2009, 2010; Hermann 2013), the perception and awareness of metaphorical construals in the ‘academic habitat’ among prospective English philologists may be variegated, ranging between more traditional and more modern perspectives. My intention is, then, to obtain feedback from them as it concerns their views on (the role of) metaphor(ization) in the academic habitat and beyond it, in their life and in the world in general. The results reveal that the students are closer to traditional rather than modern stances on metaphor, though the situation is more complex.
Keywords
metaphor(ization), academic environment, metaphor perception by students, metaphor awareness among students
References
Black, M. (1981). Metaphor. In M. Johnson (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on metaphor (pp. 63–82). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Black, M. (1993). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.,pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London/Oakville: Equinox.
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment.
Evans, V. (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R.W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 462-482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goatly, A. (2011). The language of metaphors (2 ed.). London/New York: Routledge.
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) [Movie transcript] Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/30405851/Guardians_of_the_Galaxy_Movie_Transcript_Movie_Script_of_Guardians_of_the_Galaxy
Haase, C. (2009). Pragmatics through corpora in cultures: An empirical comparison of academic writing. Topics in linguistics 4, 23-30.
Haase, C. (2010). Mediating between the “two cultures” in academia: The role of conceptual metaphor. Discourse and Interaction 1 (3), 5-18.
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse. Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.
Kachru, B. B. (1985). The bilinguals’ creativity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 20–33.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 459–491.
MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical competence in EFL: Where we are and where we should be going? A view from the classroom. AILA Review, 23, 155–173.
Müller, C. (2008): Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Searle, J. R. (1993). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 83–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1991). Loose talk. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 540–549). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor--now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.
Traugott, E. C. (1985). ‘Conventional’ and ‘dead’ metaphors revisited. In W. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (pp. 17–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Institute of English, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland Poland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
