Gender-based Differences in EFL Learners' Language Learning Strategies and Productive Vocabulary
Abstract
Gender is a key factor in the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), where its impact on language learning strategies (Aslan, 2009; Oxford & Nyikos, 1989; Sumarni & Rachmawaty, 2019) and productive vocabulary (Canga Alonso & Arribas García, 2014; Fleckenstein, 2018; Jiménez Catalán & Moreno Espinosa, 2004) has been investigated. However, to our knowledge, there is a lack of research of gender on language learning strategies in relation to productive vocabulary in English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The present study aimed to pursue three objectives. The first one was to ascertain whether males or females employed more language learning strategies. The second objective was to determine whether males or females had more productive vocabulary. Finally, the third objective was to investigate whether there was a statistically significant relationship between language learning strategies and productive vocabulary. The sample consisted of 51 EFL learners (20 males and 31 females) at the second year of Spanish non-compulsory Secondary Education (equivalent to 12th grade). The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire (Oxford, 1990) and the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT) (Laufer & Nation, 1995, 1999) were the instruments employed in order to measure informants’ language learning strategies and productive vocabulary respectively. Afterwards, students’ answers were processed electronically and analyzed quantitatively. Results revealed that females use language learning strategies significantly more than males, but there were not statistically significant differences between them regarding productive vocabulary. Moreover, a positive correlation was found between language learning strategies and productive vocabulary.
Keywords
gender-differences; language learning strategies; productive vocabulary; EFL learners; second year of Spanish non-compulsory Secondary Education
References
Agustín Llach, M. P., & Terrazas Gallego, M. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. ELIA, 12(1), 45–75.
Alhaisoni, E. (2012). Language learning strategy use of Saudi EFL students in an intensive English learning context. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n13p115
Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03
AlSohbani, Y. A. (2018). Language learning strategy use by Turkish international school students in Yemen. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/060203
Andreou, G., Vlachos, F., & Andreou, E. (2005). Affecting factors in second language learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6202-0
Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University.
Bacon, S. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76, 160–178.
Baltaoğlu, M. G., & Güven, M. (2019). Self-efficacy, learning strategies and learning styles of teacher candidates: Anadolu University example. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.333735
Boyle, J. P. (1987). Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning, 37(2), 273–284.
Burstall, C. (1975). Primary French in the balance. Educational Research, 17(3), 193–198.
Canga Alonso, A., & Arribas García, M. (2014). Productive vocabulary knowledge of Spanish EFL learners. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 1, 39–56.
Castro García, D. (2017). Are we preparing secondary students for a productive use of vocabulary in english as their second language? Porta Linguarum, 28, 141–155.
Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71–84). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London and New York: Longman.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 421–446.
Ekstrand, L. H. (1980). Sex differences in second language learning? Empirical studies and a discussion of related findings. International Review of Applied Psychology, 29(1–2), 205–259.
El-Dib, M. A. B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02176.x
Fleckenstein, L. M. (2018). English vocabulary knowledge at the end of compulsory education in Iceland (Master dissertation). University of Iceland.
García Herrero, M. de las M., & Jiménez Vivas, A. (2015). Estrategias utilizadas por estudiantes universitarios en el aprendizaje de la lengua extranjera según el género y nivel de competencia. Docencia e Investigación, 25(1), 29–58.
Ghadessy, M. (1998). Language learning strategies of some univeresity students in Hong Kong. Estudios Ingleses de La Universidad Complutense, 6, 101–128.
Goh, C. C. M., & Foong, K. P. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39–53.
Gorevanova, A. (2000). The relationship between students’ perceptual learning style preferences, language learning strategies and English language vocabulary size (Master dissertation). Bilkent University.
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00048-4
Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gu, P. Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies on Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35–54.
Gu, P. Y. (2010). Learning strategies for vocabulary development. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 105–118.
Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., Bhar, S. K., & Letchumanan, K. (2015). Vocabulary levels and size of Malaysian undergraduates. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p119
Hugar, S. (1982). The effect of gender on first and second language use and acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 21, 17–31.
Jiménez Catalán, R. M., & Moreno Espinosa, S. (2004). L2 word associations and the variable sex: An outline according to an electronic tool. In Rodríguez Celada, A., Pastor García, D., & Pardo García, P. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International AEDEAN Conference. Editorial Ambos Mundos.
Jiménez Catalán, R. M., & Terrazas Gallego, M. (2005–2008). The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies, 5–6, 173–191. Retrieved from: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3094613.pdf
Khan, A. A., Shah, S. R. A., & Ahmad, H. (2018). Language learning strategies and students’ performance in ESL classrooms. Global Language Review, 3(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2018(iii-i).02
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.
Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41(4), 339–379. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.016
Lau, K., & Gardner, D. (2019). Disciplinary variations in learning styles and preferences: Implications for the provision of academic English. System, 80, 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.010
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive vocabulary. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51.
Lee, S. (2007). Vocabulary learning strategies of Korean university students: Strategy use, vocabulary size, and gender. English Teaching, 62(1), 149–169.
Lin, J., & Wu, F. (2003). Differential performance by gender in foreign language testing. Poster for the 2003 Annual Meeting of NCME in Chicago, 1–20.
López-Rúa, P. (2006). The sex variable in foreign language learning: An integrative approach. Porta Linguarum, 6, 99–114.
López Aguado, M. (2011). Estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Diferencias por género, curso y tipo de titulación. TESI, 12(2), 203–233.
Lynn, R., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2005). Sex differences on the WISC-R in New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.009
Marzban, A., & Barati, Z. (2016). On the relationship between critical thinking ability, language learning strategies, and reading comprehension of male and female intermediate EFL university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(6), 1241–1247. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0606.14
Meara, P. (1990). A note on passive vocabulary. Second Language Research, 6(2), 150–154.
Moreno Espinosa, S. (2010). Boy’s and girls’ L2 word associations. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 139–163). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moyo, F. (2018). An Overview of productive vocabulary levels amongst ESL learners and teachers in Gauteng township schools (Master dissertation). University of South Africa.
Mutar, Q. M. (2018). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of Iraqi upper secondary school students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 59–67. Retrieved from: http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/1765/1642
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: OISE.
Namaziandost, E., Sabzevari, A., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2018). The effect of cultural materials on listening comprehension among Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners: In reference to gender. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–27.
Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nisbet, D. L., Tindall, E. R., & Arroyo, A. A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x
Noprianto, E., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and their affixes knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547730
Norton, B., & Pavlenko, A. (2004). Gender and English language learners. Alexandria (Virginia): TESOL.
Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex‐related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01063.x
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oflaz, A. (2019). The effects of anxiety, shyness and language learning strategies on speaking skills and academic achievement. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.999
Oxford, R. L. (1989). The use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 12(2), 235–247.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00023-D
Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
Pavlenko, A. (2001). Bilingualism, gender, and ideology. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(2), 117–151.
Pawlak, M. (2013). Another look at the effect of gender on the use of language learning strategies: The case of advanced Polish learners of English. In K. Piaztkowska, & E. Kosciałkowska-Okonska (Eds.), Correspondences and contrasts in foreign language pedagogy and translation studies. Springer International Publishing.
Rahimi, M., & Allahyari, A. (2019). Effects of multimedia learning combined with strategy-based instruction on vocabulary learning and strategy Use. SAGE, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019844081
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87–111.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.
Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., & Salahshour, N. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(1957), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.103
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scarcella, R., & Zimmerman, C. (1998). Academic words and gender. ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 27–49.
Scheepers, R. A. (2014). Lexical levels and formulaic language: An exploration of undergraduate students’ vocabulary and written production of delexical multiword units (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa.
Sepasdar, M., & Soori, A. (2014). The impact of age on using language learning strategies. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2(3), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.3p.26
Stern, H. H. (1975). What we can learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.
Sumarni, S., & Rachmawaty, N. (2019). Gender differences in language learning strategies. Ethical Lingua, 6(1), 13–22.
Sunderland, J. (2000). Research into gender in language education: Lingering problems and new directions. The Language Teacher, 24(7), 8–10.
Tabanlioğlu, S. (2003). The relationship between learning styles and language learning strategies of pre-intermediate EAP students (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Tamada, Y. (1996). Japanese learners’ language learning strategies: The relationship between learners’ personal factors and their choices of language learning strategies (Master dissertation). University of Lancaster.
Tercanlioglu, L. (2004). Exploring gender effect on adult foreign language learning strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 14(2), 181–193.
Wenden, A. (1983). Literature review: The process of intervention. Language Learning, 33, 573–597.
Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00117
Yaacob, A., Shapii, A., Saad Alobaisy, A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Al-Dheleai, Y. M., Yahaya, N., & Alamri, M. M. (2019). Vocabulary learning strategies through secondary students at Saudi school in Malaysia. SAGE, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019835935
Yilmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.084
University of La Rioja Spain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
