Praise in the EFL Classroom
A Growth Mindset Perspective
Abstract
This study investigates how praising students’ success in tasks affects the performance of other students who were not successful. Possible and impossible crossword puzzles were used as an experiment to engender fixed mindsets in half of the sample. The average time to complete a crossword puzzle at the pretest was compared to the average time to complete the same puzzle at the posttest. The results showed that students given possible crossword puzzles were able to make significant improvements in the speed with which they could complete the puzzle at the posttest stage. However, such improvements in performance were not seen among the students who had been temporarily primed into a fixed mindset during the experiment through the use of the impossible crossword puzzles. Reasons behind these results as well as pedagogical implications related to effective ways of giving praise and other feedback will be discussed.
Keywords
growth mindset, failure, feedback, university students, praise
References
Aiba, C., Fujiwara, M., Byrd, B., & Barrows, J. (2016). Hello English: English for teachers of children. Tokyo, Japan: Seibido.
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1999). Applied behaviour analysis for teachers (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Arbel, Y., Hong, L., Baker, T. E., & Holroyd, C. B. (2017). It’s all about timing: An electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback. Neuropsychologia, 99, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.003
Arnold, J. (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Personality: Personality traits as independent and dependent variables. In S. Mercer, S.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2009). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674–685. https://doi. org/10.1037/h0077149
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34– 39. Retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct07/vol65/num02/The-Perils-and-Promises-of-Praise.aspx
Dweck, C. S. (2009). Developing talent through a growth mindset. Olympic Coach, 21(1), 4–7. Retrieved from: https://www.teamusa.org/About-the-USOPC/Programs/Coaching-Education/Coach-E-Magazine
Dweck, C. S. (2014). The power of yet [Video]. TEDxTalks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-swZaKN2Ic
Dweck, C. S. (September, 2015). Carol Deck revisits the ‘growth mindset.’ Retrieved from: https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-carol-dweck-revisits-the-growth-mindset/2015/09
Dweck C. S. (2018). Growth mindset interventions yield impressive results. Retrieved from:
https://theconversation.com/growth-mindset-interventions-yield- impressive-results-97423
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.95.2.256
Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034248
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
Gardner, B., & Gardner, F. (2005). Classroom English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gunderson, E. A., Sorhagen, N. S., Gripshover, S. J., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Parent praise to toddlers predicts fourth grade academic achievement via children’s incremental mindsets. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000444
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77. 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Johnson, J., Gooding, P. A., Wood, A., M., Taylor, P. J., & Tarrier, N. (2011). Trait reappraisal amplifies subjective defeat, sadness, and negative affect in response to failure versus success in nonclinical and psychosis populations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(4), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023737
Johnson, J., Panagioti, M., Bass, J., Ramsey, L., & Harrison, R. (2017). Resilience to emotional distress in response to failure error or mistakes: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 52, 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.11.007
Johnston, P. H. (2012). Opening minds: Using language to change lives. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.35.3.835
Keefe, J. W. (2007). What is personalization? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900312
Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.360
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Leis, A. (2014). The self-confidence and performance of young learners in an EFL environment:
A self-worth perspective. JES Journal, 14, 84–99. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jesjournal/14/01/14_84/_pdf
Leis, A., & Wilson, M. (2017). Giving averages: Is it worth it? Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.461030
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.03.004
Matsuzaka Carreira, J. (2009). Bright and early: Classroom English for teachers of children. Tokyo, Japan: Nan’un-do.
Mercer, S. (2012). Dispelling the myth of the natural-born linguist. ELT Journal, 66(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr022
Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2009). A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64(4), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp083
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https:// doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.33
Ommundsen, Y. (2001). Pupils’ affective responses in physical education classes: The association of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goals. European Physical Education Review, 7(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x010073001
Ong, M. F., & Murugesan, V. (2007). Teaching English to young learners: An illustrated guide for EFL teacher development. Seoul, Korea: Compass Publishing.
Opitz, B., Ferdinand, N. K., & Mecklinger, A. (2011). Timing matters: The impact of immediate and delayed feedback on artificial language learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 8–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00008
Orosz, G., Péter-Szarka, S., Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., & Berger, R. (2017). How not to do a mindset intervention: Learning from a mindset intervention among students with good grades. Front Psychol, 8, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00311
Seligman, M. E., Maier, S. F., & Geer, J. H. (1968). Alleviation of learned helplessness in the dog. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025831
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797617739704
Sutherland, K. S., Copeland, S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Catch them while you can: Monitoring and increasing the use of effective praise. Beyond Behavior, 11(1), 46–49. Retrieved from: http://ahbpbs.pbworks.com/f/monitoring_and_increasing_the_use_of_effective_praise.pdf
Waller, L., & Papi, M. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion and action. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Whalley, C. L., Cutting, N., & Beck, S. R. (2017). The effect of prior experience on children’s tool innovation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.009
Zhao, L., Heyman, G. D., Chen, L., & Lee, K. (2017). Praising young children for being smart promotes cheating. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1868–1870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617721529
Miyagi University of Education Japan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holders of the submitted texts are the Authors. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the TAPSLA websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA 4.0). The user is free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
