Allen, H. W. (2008). Textbook materials and foreign language teaching: Perspectives from the classroom. The NECTFL Review, 62, 5–28.
Google Scholar

Bardel, C., Gudmundson, A., & Lindqvist, C. (2012). Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learners’ oral production: Vocabulary acquisition and use in L2 French and Italian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000058
Google Scholar

Beauchamp, D., & Constantinou, F. (2020). Using corpus linguistic tools to identify instances
Google Scholar

of low linguistic accessibility in tests. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment publication, 29, 10–16.
Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3–43.
Google Scholar

Bulté, B., & Roothooft, H. (2020). Investigating the interrelationship between rated L2 proficiency and linguistic complexity in L2 speech, System, 91, 1–16.
Google Scholar

Casanave, C. P. (1994). Language development in students’ journals. Journal of second language
Google Scholar

writing, 3(3), 179–201.
Google Scholar

Choi, I. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.
Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., & Salsbury, T. (2010). Using lexical indices to predict produced and not produced words in second language learners. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 115–147.
Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2011). What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 182–193.
Google Scholar

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43.
Google Scholar

Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers‐Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied linguistics, 24(2), 197–222.
Google Scholar

Dean, A. C. (2017). Complex Dynamic Systems and Interlanguage Variability: Investigating Topic, Syntactic Complexity, and Accuracy in NS-NNS Written Interaction. Working
Google Scholar

Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 56–97.
Google Scholar

Du, W. (2019). Analysis on the development of lexical complexity in Chinese science students’ English writing. Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, 4(7), 116–120.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84.
Google Scholar

Ertmer, P. A., Bai, H., Dong, C., Khalil, M., Hee Park, S., & Wang, L. (2002). Online professional development: Building administrators’ capacity for technology leadership. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–11.
Google Scholar

Fletcher, P. (1985). A child’s learning of English. Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Frase, L. T., Faletti, J., Ginther, A., & Grant, L. (1999). Computer analysis of the TOEFL test of written English. Educational Testing Service.
Google Scholar

Gençoğlu, C. (2017, October). Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. COMCEC, Ankara, Turkey.
Google Scholar

Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123–145.
Google Scholar

Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2016). The impact of the university entrance exam on EFL education in Turkey:
Google Scholar

Pre-service English language teachers’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 136–144.
Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3, 2–176.
Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near‐native second‐language learners of
Google Scholar

Swedish. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 9(1–2), 67–84.
Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S. (2006). Rapid assessment of learners’ proficiency: A cognitive load approach. Educational Psychology, 26(6), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342674
Google Scholar

Kim, J. Y. (2014). Predicting L2 Writing Proficiency Using Linguistic Complexity Measures: A Corpus-Based Study. English Teaching, 69(4), 27–51.
Google Scholar

Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations.
Google Scholar

RELC Journal, 38(2), 216–228.
Google Scholar

Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication [Georgia State University]. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/35/
Google Scholar

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using finegrained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349.
Google Scholar

Kyle, K. (2019). Measuring Lexical Richness. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 454–475). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Kwary, D., Artha, A., & Amalia, Y. (2018). Lexical word-class distributions in research articles of four subject areas. Studies about Languages, 33, 108–118.
Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production.
Google Scholar

Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.
Google Scholar

Lu, X. (2011). A corpus‐based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college‐level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.
Google Scholar

Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27.
Google Scholar

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Ortaöğretim İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342
Google Scholar

Mirshojaee, S. B., & Sahragard, R. (2015). Reading comprehension passages of Iranian general English books and MA reading comprehension tests: A corpus analysis. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 2(2), 77–98.
Google Scholar

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated
Google Scholar

approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior research methods, 42(2),
Google Scholar

–392.
Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57–86.
Google Scholar

Miller, D. P. (1981). The depth/breadth trade-off in hierarchical computer menus. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 296–300). HFES.
Google Scholar

Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 287–309.
Google Scholar

Norrby, C., & Håkansson, G. (2007). The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability:
Google Scholar

The case of Swedish as a foreign language. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(1), 45–68.
Google Scholar

Nur, S., & Islam, M. (2018). The (Dis)Connection between Secondary English Education
Google Scholar

Assessment Policy and Practice: Insights from Bangladesh. International Journal of English Language Education, 6(1), 100–132.
Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
Google Scholar

Park, S.-Y. (2012). A corpus-based study of syntactic complexity measures as development indices of college-level L2 learners’ proficiency in writing. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 139–160.
Google Scholar

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sheldon, L. E. (1998). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246.
Google Scholar

Skalicky, S., Duran, N., & Crossley, S. A. (2020). Please, please, just tell me: The linguistic
Google Scholar

features of humorous deception. Retrieved from: osf.io/qdjmn
Google Scholar

Tai, S., & Chen, H.-J. (2015). Are teachers test-oriented? A comparative corpus-based analysis of the English entrance exam and junior high school English textbooks. In F. Helm,
Google Scholar

L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015
Google Scholar

EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (pp. 518–522). Research-publishing.net. http://dx.doi.
Google Scholar

org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000386
Google Scholar

Thomas, D. (2005). Type-Token Ratios in one teacher’s classroom talk: An investigation of lexical complexity. University of Birmingham.
Google Scholar

Torruella, J., & Capsada, R. (2013). Lexical statistics and typological structures: A measure of lexical richness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 447–454.
Google Scholar

Underwood, P. (2010). A comparative analysis of MEXT English reading textbooks and Japan’s National Center Test. RELC Journal, 41(2), 165–182.
Google Scholar

Vermeer, A. (2004). Vocabulary size in Dutch L1 and L2 children. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 173–189). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Wang, M. D. (1970). The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(4), 398–404.
Google Scholar

Wang, S., & Slater, T. (2016). Syntactic complexity of EFL Chinese students’ writing. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(1), 81–86.
Google Scholar

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim. H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency. Accuracy and complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
Google Scholar

Yu, X. (2018). Analyses and comparisons of three lexical features in native and nonnative academic English writing [University of Central Florida]. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6061
Google Scholar