Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364–373.
Google Scholar

Annotation Studio (2017). www.annotationstudio.org
Google Scholar

Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–199). Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
Google Scholar

Badger, R., White, G., Sutherland, P., & Haggis, T. (2001). Note perfect: An investigation of how students view taking notes in lectures. System, 29, 405–417.
Google Scholar

Castello, M., & Monereo, C. (1999). Strategic knowledge in note-taking: A study in high education. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 88, 25–42.
Google Scholar

Chaudron, C., Loschky, L., & Cook, J. (1994). Second language listening comprehension and lecture note-taking. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 75–92). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Chodkiewicz, H. (2015). Some insights into the academic reading experience of English philology students. Konin Language Studies, 3(1), 9–30.
Google Scholar

Clerehan, R. (1995). Taking it down: Note taking practices of L1 and L2 students. English for specific purposes, 14(2), 137–157.
Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2007). Ancient Greek scholarship: A guide to finding, reading, and understanding scholia, commentaries, lexica, and grammatical treatises. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79.
Google Scholar

García, O., Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K. (2017). The translanguaging classroom. Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Caslon.
Google Scholar

Gérouit, C., Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y., & Barbier, M. L. (2001). Coût attentionnel de la recherche d’informations par des adultes sur hypertexte et sur document papier. In M. Mojahid & J. Virbel (Eds.), Actes du 4 Colloque International sur le Document Electronique (pp. 201–215). Europia production.
Google Scholar

Gross, M. D. (1996). The electronic cocktail napkin-computer support for working with diagrams. Design Studies, 17, (1), 53–69.
Google Scholar

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Grabe, W. & Stroller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students’ copyand- paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 103–116.
Google Scholar

James, K. H. (2017). The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 502–508.
Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. T., & Mueller, S. (1993). Performance amplification and process restructuring in computer-based writing. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 33–49.
Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.
Google Scholar

Kiszczak, A., & Chodkiewicz, H. (2019). Text-based student questioning in EFL settings: Longterm strategy implementation in reciprocal reading tasks and its perception. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 39–57.
Google Scholar

Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149.
Google Scholar

Lorenzo, G., & Dziuban, C. (2006). Ensuring the net generation is net savvy. Educause Learning Initiative, ELI paper 2.
Google Scholar

Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: Effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46, 1–25.
Google Scholar

Marshall, C. (1997). Annotation: From paper books to the digital library. In Proceedings of the ACM Digital Libraries ’97 Conference (pp. 131–140). Philadelphia, PA.
Google Scholar

Marshall, C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext ’98 (pp. 40–49). Pittsburgh, PA.
Google Scholar

Middendorf, C. H., & Macan, T. H. (2002). Note-taking in the employment interview: Effects on recall and judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.293
Google Scholar

Morehead, M., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019). How much mightier is the pen than the
Google Scholar

keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer 2014. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 753–780.
Google Scholar

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168.
Google Scholar

O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of CHI’97 (pp. 335–342). Atlanta, Georgia (March 22–27, 1997).
Google Scholar

Perez-Vega, R., Waite, K., O’Gorman, K. (2016). Social Impact Theory: An examination of how immediacy operates as an influence upon social media interaction. The Marketing Review, 16(3), 299–321.
Google Scholar

Piolat, A. (2001). La prise de notes [Note Taking]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar

Piolat, A., & Boch, F. (2004). Apprendre en notant et apprendre à noter. In E. Gentaz & P. Dessus [Learning by Taking Notes and Learning to Take Notes] (Eds.), Comprendre les apprentissages. Psychologie cognitive et éducation [Understanding Learning. Cognitive Psychology and Education] (pp. 133–152). Dunod.
Google Scholar

Piolat, A., Kellogg, R. T., & Farioli, F. (2001). The triple task technique for studying writing processes: On which task is attention focused? Current Psychology Letters. Brain, Behavior and Cognition, 4, 67–83.
Google Scholar

Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312.
Google Scholar

Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M. & van den Broek, P. (2018).
Google Scholar

Comprehension processes in digital reading. In M. Barzillai, J. Thomson, S. Schroeder, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91–210). Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Sanchez, R. P., Lorch, E. P., & Lorch, R. F. (2001). Effects of headings on text processing strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 418–428.
Google Scholar

Schwanenflugel, P., & Knapp, N. (2016). The psychology of reading: Theory and applications. Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Shulmann, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Google Scholar

Siegel, J. (2018). Did you take “good” notes?: On methods for evaluating student note taking performance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 85–92.
Google Scholar

Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P.A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.
Google Scholar

Ślęzak-Świat, A. (2019). Complementarity of reading from paper and screen: Development of critical thinking. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 75–93.
Google Scholar

Van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Development of reading comprehension. In K. Cain, D. Compton, & R. Parilla (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 283–305). Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Van Waes, L., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Writing profiles: The effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 829–853.
Google Scholar

Vinci-Booher, S., James, T. W., & James, K. H. (2016). Visual-motor functional connectivity in preschool children emerges after handwriting experience. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5, 107–120.
Google Scholar

Vogel, S., Ascenzi-Moreno, L., & García, O. (2018). What counts as a literacy act? Examining pedagogical spaces created through digital translanguaging. In J. Choi & S. Ollerhead (Eds.), Plurilingualism in teaching and learning: Complexities across contexts. Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar

Wylie, J., Thomson, J., Leppanen, P., Ackerman, R., Kanniainen, L., & Prieler, T. (2018). Cognitive processes and digital reading. In M. Barzillai, J. Thomson, S. Schroeder, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 57–90). Benjamins.
Google Scholar