From Pilgrim to Local The Problem of Unity in Postmodern Philosophy
Abstract
In this article, the author outlines the problem of unity from the perspective of postmodern philosophy. Basically, unity of the human being is one of the most important problems of philosophy. Ancient philosophers identified human being as identical with citizenship. Man as a citizen of Athens was able to prove his citizenship of Athens by pointing to his ownership of family tombs and fireplace. Medieval philosophy continued the ancient idea but added one new aspect, hope. A medieval man was a citizen of
the empire, but at the same time he or she was a citizen of Kingdom of Heaven. He or she was a pilgrim who travelled to God. Modern philosophy develops unity in an absolutely different way of thinking. First,
what we have to know is that unity is a problem. Second, if we would like to solve this problem, it is absolutely necessary to use a new terminology. In this article I emphasize like to highlight the phenomenon of identity through an analysis that the Polish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman did in the past three decades. He divided a modern man into two categories. First, Bauman characterized a modern man as a global, very rich and well educated and can invest capital in all countries of the world. The second type is a local. He is
a type of modern man who is not necessarily poor, but who is bound to only one place where he resides. The problem of the locals is that they cannot freely travel and invest in their own capital. Locals live in one place, they have not enough power to influence local politics, economy, infrastructure, religions. Globals are able to influence the local community by means of politics, economy, social structures, and religion. Zygmunt Bauman describes the identity of modern man as a tension between locals and globals.
Keywords
unity; “global” identity; “local” identity; postmodernity
References
Anselm of Canterbury: Proslogion. Harmondsworth. Penguin, 1983.
Aurelius A: Křesťanská vzdělanost. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2005.
Bauman Z.: Individualizovaná společnost. Trans. M. Ritter. Praha: Mladá fronta, 2004.
BIBLE, Písmo svaté Starého a Nového zákona včetně deuterokanonických knih. Český ekumenický překlad. Praha: Česká biblická společnost, 1996.
Elsenhans H.: “Globalizace, nacionalismus a stabilita předválečných systémů.” In: Dějiny světa. Ed. W. Demel. Praha 2013.
Giddens A.: Modernity and Self-Identity. Self nad Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford Univerity Press, 1991.
Heidegger M.: Bytí a čas. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 1996.
Horváthová P.: Základy managementu. Ostrava: VŠB-TU Ostrava, 2013.
Katrňák T.: “Rev. of: Zygmund Bauman Globalizace: Důsledky pro člověka.” Politologický časopis 1 (2000), pp. 80—82.
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu: Suma teologiczna. London: Veritas, 1963.
Web sources
Sancti Tomae de Aquino: Corpus Thomisticum. Sententia libri ethicorum. Available at: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/ctc0104.html (access: 16.05.2022
VSB-Technical University of Ostrava Czechia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-3813
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.