The Source of Notions. Plato’s Conception of Language in the Perspective of His Ontology
Abstract
In the paper, I argue for an importance of holistic approach to Corpus Platonicum, and such lecture of it, which leads to the coherent model of Plato's ontology, and epistemology connected with his conception of language. The starting point of my draft of, as I assume, much-needed investigation, is the analysis of Cratylus and theory of truth depended on proper names. The next step is taking under consideration Plato's quotation from Hesiod, which steers into differentiation between two ways of substantiating statements given by Hesiod in his two didactic poems. The right name has not to be given by gods nor does it belong to the ancient order, even such old as the Golden Age. Instead, it has to belong to the natural order, which makes everything that exists to be as a whole. Hence, it could be created, it could be given a name by lawgivers or others, who understand these valid connections, for example, by honest sophist or true artisan of technē basilike – the philosopher. Accordingly, the proper name is the fruit of hard working; it takes a lot of investigation to find one. This conclusion leads to the analysis of Plato's methodology of proper investigation that connects dialectics with the geometrical approach: the method of exposing the proper measure. Plato's epistemology consists with several (possibly seven, as it is shown in Republic) levels of perceiving the world, and bi-polarity of One and Many is crucial for his ontology, hence there are few sources of nations. But, as I argue, phantasia gives only false and worthless notions, eikasia is the source of practical ones, and noesis solely creates the true, proper, and essential notion. The notion created by noesis is connected with every other notion, with other forms, and things in the proper measures.
References
Bibliography:
A. Primary sources:
Hesiod: Works and Days, [in:] The Homeric Hymns and Homerica with an English Translation, trans. H. G. Evelyn-White, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1914.
Hesiod, Theogony, [in:] The Homeric Hymns and Homerica with an English Translation, trans. H. G. Evelyn-White, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1914.
Parmenides Fr. 7, [from:] Plato: Sophist 237a6-7, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. XII, trans. H. N. Fowles, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1921.
Plato, VII Letter, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. VII, trans. R. G. Bury, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1966.
Plato, VII Letter, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Cratylus, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. XII, trans. H. N. Fowles, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1921.
Plato, Cratylus, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Gorgias, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. III, trans. W. R. M. Lamb, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1967.
Plato, Gorgias, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Parmenides, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. IX, trans. by H. N. Fowler, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1925.
Plato, Parmenides, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Phaedrus, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. IX, trans. H. N. Fowler, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1925.
Plato, Phaedrus, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Philebus, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. IX, trans. H. N. Fowler, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1925.
Plato, Philebus, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Republic, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. V-VI, trans. P. Shorey, Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1969.
Plato, Republic, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Sophist, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. XII, trans. H. N. Fowles. Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1921.
Plato, Sophist, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
Plato, Theaetetus, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. XII, trans. H. N. Fowles. Cambridge (Massachusetts) – London 1921.
Plato, Theaetetus, [in:] Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1903.
B. Secondary sources:
Abramczyk I., Platons Dialog „Kratylos” und das Problem der Sprachphilosophie, Breslau 1928.
Büchner K., Platons Kratylos und die modern Sprachphilosophie, Berlin 1936.
Casertano G., Il Sofista, [in:] Idem, Il nome della cosa. Linguaggio e realtà negli ultimi dialoghi di Platone, Napoli 1996, pp.86-214.
Derbolav J., Der Dialog „Kratylos” im Rahmen der platonischen Sprach- und Erkenntnisphilosophie, Saarbrücken 1953.
Deuschle J., Die platonische Sprachphilosophie, Marburg 1852.
Eco U., Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Bloomington (Indiana) 1986.
Fine G., Plato on Knowledge and Forms. Selected Essays, Oxford 2003.
Gaiser K., Name und Sache in Platons „Kratylos”, Heidelberg 1974.
Gerson L. P., A Distinction in Plato’s Sophist, [in:] Plato. Critical Assessment, Vol. IV., pp. 125-141.
Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity, edit. P. Swiggers & A. Wauters, Leuven – Paris – Sterling (Virginia) 2002, ORBIS/ SUPPLEMENTA. Monographs Published by the International Center of General Dialectology (Louvain), Vol. XIX.
Guthrie W.K.C., A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. IV: Plato: the man and his dialogues. Earlier period, Vol. V: The later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge, 1996.
Kahn C. H., Language and Ontology in the Cratylus, [in:] Exegesis and Argument. Studies in Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos, „Phronesis” Supp. Vol. I, Assen 1973, pp.152-176.
Kahn C. H., Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The philosophical use of a literary form, Cambridge 1996.
Lorentz K., J. Mittelstrass J., On Rational Philosophy of Language: The Program in Plato’s „Cratylus” Reconsidered, „Mind” 76: 1967, pp. 1-20.
Paglioro A., Struttura e pensiero del „Cratilo” di Platone, [in:] Idem, Nuovi Saggi di Critica Semanica, Messina – Firenze 1956, pp. 47-76.
Plato and Hesiod, edit. G. R. Boys-Stones & J. H. Haubold, Oxford 2010.
Plato. Critical Assessments, edit. N. D. Smith, Vol. I- IV, London – New York 1998.
Richardson M., True and False Names in the „Cratylus”, „Phronesis” 21: 1976 nr 2., pp. 135-145.
Roberts J., The Problem about Being in the Sophist, [in:] Plato. Critical Assessment, Vol. IV, pp.142-157.
Strauss Clay J., Hesiod’s Cosmos, Cambridge 2003.
Thesleff H., Platonic Chronology, [in:] Plato. Critical Assessment. Vol. I, pp.50-73.
White N. P., Plato’s metaphysical epistemology, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edit. R. Kraut, Cambridge 1992, pp. 277-310.
Young C. M., Plato and Computer Dating. A Discussionof Gerard R. Ledger, »Re-counting Plato: A Computer Analysis of Plato’s Style«, and Leonard Brandwood, »The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues«, [in:] Plato. Critical Assessment, Vol. I, pp. 29-49.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
