Patočka i Masaryk

Josef Zumr

Opublikowane: 2018-04-28

Tom 31 (2013)

Patočka i Masaryk

Josef Zumr

Abstrakt

The aim of the paper is to analyse relation between Jan Patočka and Tomáš G.Masaryk. The former was referring to the latter’s concepts throughout his work, inmost cases from the perspective of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology. According toPatočka, both in Masaryk and Husserl the most important symptom of crisis is thepositivist hypostising of the scientific method and the loss of religion. The commonstarting point of both theories was the thesis according to which Europe is goingthrough a spiritual crisis which arises from subjectivism. The difference betweenthem, however, was in the concepts of the ways to resolve the crisis. According toMasaryk, the solution is to be found in restoration of religion, whereas Husserl seesit in transcendental phenomenology. Patočka was wrong when he stressed how muchout of date were Masaryk’s views. For they might be taken as topical in their moraland religious aspects, value of which was proved during the hard times for Czechand Slovak nations.

Pobierz pliki

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Zumr, J. (2018). Patočka i Masaryk. Folia Philosophica, 31. Pobrano z https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/FOLIA/article/view/6920

Bibliografia

J. Zumr: Patočka a Masaryk. „Filosofický Časopis” 1991, r. 39, č. 3
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

J. Patočka: Masaryk. Soubor statí přednášek a poznámek. Praha 1979
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

V. Černý: Dvě studie masarykovské. „Svědectví” 1977, r. 14, č. 56
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

T. G. M. a naše současnost. Masarykův sborník VII. Praha 1980
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

J. Opat: Glosy ke dvěma kritikám T. G. Masaryka. „Slovanský přehled” 1990, r. 76, č. 3
Google Scholar

Tom 31 (2013)
Opublikowane: 2018-04-29

ISSN: 1231-0913

eISSN: 2353-9445

10.31261/fp

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Prześlij tekst