Online Teacher Training for Global Teaching Contexts – Can E-learning Help Develop Better Language Teachers?
Abstract
During the two-year pandemic period all university education, including language teacher training, was conducted exclusively in the online mode. While for many instructional contexts transition to the online mode meant decreasing the effectiveness of instruction due to lack of physical contact and greater time
consumption for materials development, it became clear that skillful use of e-learning tools and procedures might give university education a boost. The paper will put to test the research hypothesis that using social professional networks, composed of participants who are familiar to one another outside the course but
become new personas inside it, will have a positive effect on the involvement of teacher trainees in pursuing teaching qualifications, evidenced in their increased participation in methodology-oriented tasks in different modes. This will be illustrated with examples from the Foreign Language Teaching Methodology online course for undergraduate applied linguistics students which blended synchronous and asynchronous interactions in different Moodle activities.
Keywords
online professional development; pandemic emergency teaching; learner autonomy; online learning platforms
References
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Doliner, L., Nazarov, V. (2021). Adapting the e-course for teacher training in the teacher professional development system. E3S Web of Conferences 295, 05002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129505002
Douglas-Faraci, D. (2010). A correlational study of six professional development domains in e-learning teacher professional development. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 754–766.
Ernest, P., Guitert Catasus, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., & Stickler, U. (2013). Online teacher development: collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.667814
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge/Taylor and Francis. ISBN: 978-0415885836
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer referencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D.R. & Vaughan, N.D. (2012). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-118-26955-8
Hanson-Smith, E. (2007). Critical issues: Places and spaces. In J. L. Egbert, E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL Environments (pp. 42–58). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. ISBN: 978-1931185431
Hoven, D. (2006). Designing for disruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ASCILITE Conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? (pp. 339–349). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney. ISBN: 9781920898489
Impedovo, M. A., & Malik, S. K. (2019). Pakistani teacher-educator professional learning through an international blended course. Open Praxis, 11(2), 157–166. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.928
Mackenzie, D., Promnitz-Hayashi, L., Jenks, D., Geluso, J., Delgado, R., Castellano, J., & Hinkelman, D. (2011). Blended learning spaces: Synchronous blending. The JALTCALL Journal, 7(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v7n1.107
McDonald, K. (2008). Fostering departmental communication and collaboration with online discussion forums. The JALTCALL Journal, 4(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v4n2.60
Medina Garriguez, C., Hiasat, L., & Billy, R. J. F. (2019). Basic linguistics for English language teachers: A community for professional development online. TESL-EJ, 23(1), 1–21. ISSN: 1072-4303
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Kurek, M. (2016). Virtual group formation and the process of task design in online intercultural exchanges. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online Intercultural Exchange (pp. 145–163). London: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138932876
Picciano, A.G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673
Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2018). The maelstrom of online programs in Colombian teacher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(114). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3873
Prestridge, S. (2016) Conceptualising self-generating online teacher professional development. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 85–104. 10.1080/1475939X.2016.1167113
Ranjan, P. (2020). Is blended learning better than online learning for B.Ed students? Journal of Learning for Development – JL4D, 7(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i3.412
Razak, R. A., & Yusop, F. D. (2013). Designing framework of electronic continued professional development for teachers (e-CPD). Paper presented at the Annual International Conference on Management and Technology in Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality 2013 (SERVE 2013), Jakarta, Indonesia.
Satar, H. M., & Akcan, S. (2018). Pre-service EFL teachers’ online participation, interaction, and social presence. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 157–183. DOI: https//dx.doi.org/10125/44586
Son, J.-B. (2000). Teacher development in e-learning environments. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/21190532/Teacher_development_in_e_learning_environments (accessed 1 July 2021).
Staker, H. & Horn, M.B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Lexington: Innosight Institute. Retrieved from https://aurora-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning2.pdf (accessed 13 October 2022).
Thomas, S. (2011). Virtual communities of practice: An inquiry into the creation, benefits, motivations, enablers and barriers to participation. The JALTCALL Journal, 7(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v7n2.119
Truong, M. T., & Murray, J. (2019). Understanding language teacher motivation in online professional development: A study of Vietnamese EFL teachers. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1–22. ISSN: 1072-4303
Webb, D. C., Nickerson, H., & Bush, J. B. (2017). A comparative analysis of online and face-to-face professional development models for CS education. SIGCSE‚ 17, March 08-11, 2017. Seattle, WA: SIGCSE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017784
Wittman, G.-E., Olivier, J. (2021). Blended learning as an approach to foster self-directed learning in teacher professional development programmes. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 71–84. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jitl1-v16-n2-a7
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-9960
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
