Challenges Related to the Postulates of Students Towards Education in Post-Pandemic Times


Abstract

The Covid19 pandemic has changed the day-to-day behaviour of society in many aspects, including education. The mode of operation of schools has changed from traditional to remote. The changes affected various school types, also universities. Remote teaching as a binding educational practice forced both students and teachers to adapt to a dynamically changing reality. Experience gained during the pandemic had an impact on the educational and professional prospects of students. The aim of the research was to learn about the expectations of students towards their own development and education, as well as to determine what their postulates are regarding formal education in post-pandemic times. Extensive empirical material was obtained from 100 people (women) studying at the Pedagogical University of Krakow. The objectification of the results was possible after a thorough analysis of the narrative texts (prospective). Formal and content categories were distinguished, which were arranged in four areas, taking into account the postulates of the surveyed students related to: (1) organisation and course of education, (2) use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education, (3) fulfilment of students’ needs, (4) personal and professional development. The selected areas form a complementary whole in which students’ expectations relate to important spheres of functioning of an individual, that is intellectual, psychosocial and physical. The students participating in the survey expect that after the pandemic they will still be able to use experience and skills gained during the remote learning, they want the university to provide a secure physical and social space. They also want to receive emotional support which would help get rid of negative feelings and also receive instrumental support to allow correct behaviour and effective participation in post-pandemic education. The described categories were expanded to include examples of students’ narratives.


Keywords

challenges; postulates; students; remote learning; post-pandemic education

Bartosz, B. (2002). Doświadczenie macierzyństwa. Analiza narracji autobiograficznych [The experience of motherhood. An analysis of autobiographical narratives]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, ISBN: 83-229-2264-7.

Bonk, C. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610.

Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

Calderón, A., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., & Moody, B. (2021). An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programmes: Teacher educators’ and preservice teachers’ experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(6), 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.182396.

Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and Higher Education: First-Year Students’ Expectations toward Distance Learning. Sustainability 13(4), 1889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041889.

Charmaz K., (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej. [Grounded theory. A practical guide to qualitative analysis]. Przełożyła Barbara Komorowska. Warszawa: PWN. ISBN: 9788301160869.

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective, Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367.

Creswell, J.W., (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. [Research Desing. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches] tłumaczenie Joanna Gilewicz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. ISBN: 978-83-233-3539-9.

Dagiene, H. and Kurilovas, E. (2010). Cases of Challenges Facing E-Learning and National Development: Institutional Studies and practices. In Ugur Demiray (Ed.), Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey. ISBN: 978-975-98590-9-1 (2.c).

Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID …and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961.

De Jong, G. J., van Tilburg, T. Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Loneliness and Social Isolation. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships In A. L. Vangelisti, D. Perlman (Ed.), pp. 485–500. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/:10.1017/CBO9780511606632.027.

Eringfeld, S. (2021). Higher education and its post-coronial future: utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge University during Covid-19. Studies in Higher Education 46(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681.

Farrell A., Vitoroulis, I., Eriksson, M., & Vaillancourt, T. (2023). Loneliness and Well-Being in Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Children, 10(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020279.

Guangul, F., Suhail, A., Khalit, M., & Khidhir, B. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w.

Helling, I. K. (1990). Metoda badań biograficznych [Biographical research method] In J. Włodarek, M. Ziółkowski (Ed.), Metoda biograficzna w socjologii [Biographical method in sociology], Warszawa–Poznań: PWN. ISBN: 8301100966.

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001.

Jenkins, L. (2021). Pre-service music teachers’ understanding of blended learning: Implications for teaching post COVID-19. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(7), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n7.5.

Kharma, Q. et al. (2021). Online Learning Acceptance Model during Covid-19: An Integrated Conceptual Model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(5), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120561.

Kumar, P., Saxena, C. & Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning- the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learn. Environ, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8.

Kaczmarzyk M., (2020). Neurobiologiczny kontekst edukacji zdalnej. [The neurobiological context of remote education] In J. Pyżalski (Ed.), Edukacja w czasach pandemii. Z dystansem o tym, co robimy obecnie jako nauczyciele [Education in times of pandemic. With a distance about what we do nowadays as teachers (pp. 20–25). Warszawa EduAkcja. ISBN: 978-83-957316-0-0.

Kruszewska, A., Nazaruk, S., & Szewczyk K. (2022). Polish teachers of early education in the face of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic – the difficulties experienced and suggestions for the future. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 50(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1849346.

Krüger, H. H., Pfaff, N. (2006). Metody badań pedagogicznych [Pedagogical research methods]. D. Sztobryn (tłum.). In B. Śliwerski (Ed.). Pedagogika. Pedagogika wobec edukacji, polityki oświatowej i badań naukowych [Pedagogy towards education, educational policy and scientific research]. T. 2. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. ISBN: 8374890223.

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918.

Lapada, A., Miguel, F., Robledo Dave.A., & Zeba F. Alam (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 Awareness, Distance Learning Education Experiences and Perceptions towards Institutional Readiness and Challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19, 6, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8.

Marek, M., Chew, C., & Wu W. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3.

Peters, M. et al., (2020). Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19: An EPAT Collective Project. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655.

Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., & Gibson, R. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition. ISBN: 978-1-933046-08-2.

Perlman, D., Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a Social Psychology of Loneliness. Personal Relationships in Disorder. In R. Gilmour, S. Duck (Ed.), pp. 31–56. Academic Press: London, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284034168_Toward_a_social_psychology_of_loneliness_Personal_relationships_3 (accessed 15.01.2023).

Popławska, A. (2022). Kandydaci na nauczycieli o edukacyjnej (nie)codzienności w czasie pandemii COVID-19. Raport z badań. [Teacher Candidates’ Opinions on Educational (Un)usual Routine in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Report from Research] Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia, 35(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2022.35.2.51-68.

Pyżalski, J. (2020). Co jest obecnie ważne, a co mniej w działaniach szkół i nauczycieli? [What is important now and what is less in the activities of schools and teachers?] In J. Pyżalski (Ed.), Edukacja w czasach pandemii. Z dystansem o tym, co robimy obecnie jako nauczyciele (pp. 25–27). Warszawa EduAkcja. ISBN: 9788374898676.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P. et al. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1.

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701.

Rubacha, K. (2016). Metodologia badań nad edukacją [Methodology of education research]. Warszawa. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne. ISBN: 9788360501115.

Şentürk, C. (2021). Effects of the blended learning model on pre-service teachers’ academic achievements and twenty-first century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10340-y.

Yusuf, N., & Al-Banawi, N. (2013). The Impact Of Changing Technology: The Case Of E-Learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 6(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v6i2.7726.

Vidal, M. (2020). L’enseignement à distance, trait d’union en temps de pandémie, Distances et médiations des savoirs [Distance learning, a link in times of pandemic. Distancing and mediating knowledge]. Online since 10 December 2020, connection on 08 March 2023. https://doi.org/10.4000/dms.5721 (accessed 15.01.2023).

Wieser, B, Bangerl, M, Karatas, K. (2022). Digitale Zukünfte der Universität: Szenarien soziotechnischen Wandels [Digital futures of the university: Scenarios of sociotechnical change]. OZS Osterr Z Soziol, 47(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-022-00507-x.

Wild, S. (2022). Trajectories of subject-interests development and influence factors in higher education. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02691-7.

Download

Published : 2023-06-17


PopławskaA., BocharovaO., & SufaB. (2023). Challenges Related to the Postulates of Students Towards Education in Post-Pandemic Times. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 9(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2023.9.1.07

Agata Popławska 
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie  Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-6121
Olena Bocharova 
Pedagogical University of Krakow, Poland  Poland
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-3925
Beata Sufa 
Pedagogical University of Krakow, Poland  Poland
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-2374




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.