Published: 2015-12-31

Always a Fragment. On Polish Literary Studies and its Canon (of the Shoah)

Paweł Wolski
Section: The Canon of the Shoah
https://doi.org/10.31261/NoZ.2015.01.05

Abstract

Always a fragment. On Polish literary studies and its canon (of the Shoah)

The author considers the status of the canon of Holocaust literary studies. Based on Jan and Aleida Assmanns’ well known thesis he proposes to consider this kind of writing as an Encyclopedia – a cumulative reading list of literary studies works considered canonical, and, on the other hand, as a Method, i.e. a model mechanism of creating an analysis and exegesis of the Holocaust writing. The author concludes that despite numerous attempts there is a dominance of canons which fall within the sphere of the first category whereas the second one still awaits fruition. According to the author, a crucial element of the latter would be to define the specific relation between a scholar and the object of his or her research as a particular feature of Holocaust literature and its theory.

Key words: Holocaust, literary (meta)criticism, canon

Download files

Citation rules

Wolski, P. (2015). Always a Fragment. On Polish Literary Studies and its Canon (of the Shoah). Narracje O Zagładzie [Narrations of the Shoah], (1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.31261/NoZ.2015.01.05

Cited by / Share

No. 1 (2015)
Published: 2015-12-30


ISSN: 2450-4424
eISSN: 2451-2133

Publisher
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.